Trump needs to pay for the wall with a tax on remittances

Do you support a tax on remittances to pay for the wall?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 55.0%
  • No

    Votes: 9 45.0%

  • Total voters
    20
Exactly what I just said; There is no money coming from Mexico in the scenario **** face.

It certainly is money Mexico can't get. It also funds the wall entirely over time. Pays for upkeep as well. Poor liitle upset libbie.

Money I’m spending on my rent is money Mexico isn’t getting either…is that paying for a wall? The tax I pay on the clothing I just bought…that is money Mexico isn’t getting either. Mexico is still getting the money **** face….there is just a tax on it now.
 
This was what Trump meant from the beginning. Liberals just twisted it or simply were too stupid to understand what he meant.

Not sure how taxing dollars flowing into Mexico makes Mexico pay for anything.

Of course you have no understanding of the solution. It would require brain cells working properly. It is a tax on money sent to Mexico from the US dumbass.

Exactly what I just said; There is no money coming from Mexico in the scenario **** face.
Yes there is. Legal immigrants and illegal immigrants are still Mexican citizens and taxing their remittances is a tax on Mexico via Mexican citizens.

What about Americans sending money to Mexico?

That's the way the mop flops. Bite the bullet.
 
Here's an idea:
Dept of Agriculture annual budget:
144 BILLION.
What to **** does this bureaucracy grow?
Eliminate it.
There's your wall.

Because we have to keep subsidizing farmers who can no longer sell products to countries we are now fighting in a pointless trade war.
 
Not sure how taxing dollars flowing into Mexico makes Mexico pay for anything.

Of course you have no understanding of the solution. It would require brain cells working properly. It is a tax on money sent to Mexico from the US dumbass.

Exactly what I just said; There is no money coming from Mexico in the scenario **** face.
Yes there is. Legal immigrants and illegal immigrants are still Mexican citizens and taxing their remittances is a tax on Mexico via Mexican citizens.

What about Americans sending money to Mexico?

That's the way the mop flops. Bite the bullet.

So it’s taxing Americans. You sound like a tax and spend liberal.
 
Money I’m spending on my rent is money Mexico isn’t getting either…is that paying for a wall? The tax I pay on the clothing I just bought…that is money Mexico isn’t getting either. Mexico is still getting the money **** face….there is just a tax on it now.

A tax used to pay for the wall...

Please explain how your personal spending habits have anything to do with US currency going to Mexico. Mexico is not getting the tax money. You rent. :lol:
 
Of course you have no understanding of the solution. It would require brain cells working properly. It is a tax on money sent to Mexico from the US dumbass.

Exactly what I just said; There is no money coming from Mexico in the scenario **** face.
Yes there is. Legal immigrants and illegal immigrants are still Mexican citizens and taxing their remittances is a tax on Mexico via Mexican citizens.

What about Americans sending money to Mexico?

That's the way the mop flops. Bite the bullet.

So it’s taxing Americans. You sound like a tax and spend liberal.

Yep, tax the remittances and spend it on a wall. That's what we've been driving at. Won't be my taxes.
 
Money I’m spending on my rent is money Mexico isn’t getting either…is that paying for a wall? The tax I pay on the clothing I just bought…that is money Mexico isn’t getting either. Mexico is still getting the money **** face….there is just a tax on it now.

A tax used to pay for the wall...

Please explain how your personal spending habits have anything to do with US currency going to Mexico. Mexico is not getting the tax money. You rent. :lol:

My point exactly…you’re stating that Mexico isn’t getting money. They’re still getting money. The person standing on our side of the border is just being taxed now. Something you guys used to be against.
 
Here's an idea:
Dept of Agriculture annual budget:
144 BILLION.
What to **** does this bureaucracy grow?
Eliminate it.
There's your wall.

Because we have to keep subsidizing farmers who can no longer sell products to countries we are now fighting in a pointless trade war.
144 billion? That was the budget before tariffs were in place.
But since it's somebody else's money, you don't give a shit.
Next.
 
So it’s taxing Americans. You sound like a tax and spend liberal.

That would mean you include illegals as Americans. Thanks for admitting it.

That is what he’s presenting…taxing people who are sending money to Mexico and we have to “bite the bullet” on that”… You should argue with him **** face.
 
Here's an idea:
Dept of Agriculture annual budget:
144 BILLION.
What to **** does this bureaucracy grow?
Eliminate it.
There's your wall.

Because we have to keep subsidizing farmers who can no longer sell products to countries we are now fighting in a pointless trade war.
144 billion? That was the budget before tariffs were in place.
But since it's somebody else's money, you don't give a shit.
Next.

Yeah, they got bail outs on top of the subsidies due to this pointless trade war.
 
My point exactly…you’re stating that Mexico isn’t getting money. They’re still getting money. The person standing on our side of the border is just being taxed now. Something you guys used to be against.

More like something you guys love to do, now you have a problem with it. :lol:

Watching you reach boiling point is hilarious.
 
Here's an idea:
Dept of Agriculture annual budget:
144 BILLION.
What to **** does this bureaucracy grow?
Eliminate it.
There's your wall.

Because we have to keep subsidizing farmers who can no longer sell products to countries we are now fighting in a pointless trade war.
144 billion? That was the budget before tariffs were in place.
But since it's somebody else's money, you don't give a shit.
Next.

Yeah, they got bail outs on top of the subsidies due to this pointless trade war.
Would you rather us keep getting ripped off? Stupid ass.
 
My point exactly…you’re stating that Mexico isn’t getting money. They’re still getting money. The person standing on our side of the border is just being taxed now. Something you guys used to be against.

More like something you guys love to do, now you have a problem with it. :lol:

Watching you reach boiling point is hilarious.

As long as we both agree on you’re a hypocrite…i’m cool **** face.
 
Here's an idea:
Dept of Agriculture annual budget:
144 BILLION.
What to **** does this bureaucracy grow?
Eliminate it.
There's your wall.

Because we have to keep subsidizing farmers who can no longer sell products to countries we are now fighting in a pointless trade war.
144 billion? That was the budget before tariffs were in place.
But since it's somebody else's money, you don't give a shit.
Next.

Yeah, they got bail outs on top of the subsidies due to this pointless trade war.
Would you rather us keep getting ripped off? Stupid ass.

You’re the one bitching about $144 billion for agriculture shit brains.
 
This was what Trump meant from the beginning. Liberals just twisted it or simply were too stupid to understand what he meant.
Yeah! That's what he meant! And he was talking about grabbing women's pets. And he didn't know about Jr's little meeting, and he did but he didn't try to cover it up, and he did but he was just trying to help his son like anyone else would have, and there are good people on both sides out there.

Jesus mother-******* Christ on a popsicle stick you morons are so gullible it just absolutely amazes me.

:auiqs.jpg:
'Jesus mother-******* Christ on a popsicle stick'

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
 
15th post
My point exactly…you’re stating that Mexico isn’t getting money. They’re still getting money. The person standing on our side of the border is just being taxed now. Something you guys used to be against.

More like something you guys love to do, now you have a problem with it. :lol:

Watching you reach boiling point is hilarious.

As long as we both agree on you’re a hypocrite…i’m cool **** face.
You're not cool. You're a worthless leftist traitor.
 
Even Ann Coulter agrees that Trump needs to impose a tax on remittances, money sent out of the US, to pay for the wall. He doesn't even need congressional approval to do it.
Ann Coulter on Twitter


I don't know if the president can do it unilaterally, but it would need to apply to every illegal regardless of their country of origin. I also would favor a border security fee on visas to pay for an effective entry/exit system and other security needs. If the world is going to abuse our generosity let them foot the bill for needed security.

.
 
Here's an idea:
Dept of Agriculture annual budget:
144 BILLION.
What to **** does this bureaucracy grow?
Eliminate it.
There's your wall.

Because we have to keep subsidizing farmers who can no longer sell products to countries we are now fighting in a pointless trade war.
144 billion? That was the budget before tariffs were in place.
But since it's somebody else's money, you don't give a shit.
Next.

Yeah, they got bail outs on top of the subsidies due to this pointless trade war.
Would you rather us keep getting ripped off? Stupid ass.

You’re the one bitching about $144 billion for agriculture shit brains.
I'm saying eliminate it dicklick. You're not too bright, arya?
 
This was what Trump meant from the beginning. Liberals just twisted it or simply were too stupid to understand what he meant.
Yeah! That's what he meant! And he was talking about grabbing women's pets. And he didn't know about Jr's little meeting, and he did but he didn't try to cover it up, and he did but he was just trying to help his son like anyone else would have, and there are good people on both sides out there.

Jesus mother-******* Christ on a popsicle stick you morons are so gullible it just absolutely amazes me.

:auiqs.jpg:
'Jesus mother-******* Christ on a popsicle stick'

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Yes, he's definitely into oral fixations.
 
Back
Top Bottom