Trump links autism to pregnant women taking Tylenol

[Stann]

Facts are for chumps.

Lies are for chumps. trump is one of the biggest chumps that ever lived..

 

[Stann]

Previous studies of tylenol showed no link. The earliest recorded cases was 1943.

Most in the 40's,50's and even 60's were diagnosed as mentally retarded.

I believe it to be genetic , the result of a dying planet. All life on this planet is having more and more problems.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Neither Trump nor Kennedy are medically qualified. They offer no chemical analyses to support their notions,

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a statement before the announcement that “acetaminophen remains a safe, trusted option for pain relief during pregnancy.”

Do you remember this?

 

[Stann]

Do you remember this?

Sad how we were hoodwinked back then. Science and technology have come a long way. Too bad trump and kennedy didn't grow up with the rest of US.

 

[schmidlap]

Do you remember this?

Did you ever see a television commercial in which the American Cancer Society endorsed cigarettes?

If you have a particular medical problem, do you consult a medical specialist or an ideological politician/bureaucrat?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Did you ever see a television commercial in which the American Cancer Society endorsed cigarettes?

If you have a particular medical problem, do you consult a medical specialist or an ideological politician/bureaucrat?

I knew it! Degenerate democrats believe Trump just thought up this link on his own. None of those studies saying there might be a link has anything to do with it.

 

[Stann]

I knew it! Degenerate democrats believe Trump just thought up this link on his own. None of those studies saying there might be a link has anything to do with it.

He acts impulsively on his emotions not reason. Why do you listen to an idiot like that ?Or did you forget already , " They're eating cats. " .as well as 100 other examples.

 

[schmidlap]

I knew it! Degenerate democrats believe Trump just thought up this link on his own. None of those studies saying there might be a link has anything to do with it.

The cult swallows whatever Trump pulls out of his butt for them. They actually believe that he won the 2020 election "in a landslide!" and that still unknown conspirators somehow "stole" it, and that mysterious Black immigrants are eating pet cats and dogs in Ohio, despite local Republican office holders and police denying it.

Ann Bauer, an epidemiologist and co-author of research linking the active ingredient in Tylenol to increased incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders, cautioned that “correlation is not causation” and recommended that additional research be completed before declaring a public victory regarding autism.

MSN

 

[Crepitus]

View attachment 1165137

Trump today said he has been able to ling the rapid rise of autism associated with pregnant women taking Tylenol after an exhaustive study of the pregnancy of AOC's mother Blanca. "I popped Tylenol like candy", boasted Blanca. I had to because my back hurt through my whole pregnancy."

Since there were no other apparent links to producing such a mentally deficient offspring, scientists were forced to credit the Tylenol for all of AOC's apparent mental retardation.

No word yet on how many people AOC has convinced to have the state become their lord and savior, if any. But yea, that's just retarded.

Dude, just stop.

You aren't funny.

It's just a fact.

 

[skye]

No causal.effect. you dreaming my up shit to try to justify trump 's irresponsible actions.

 

[Stann]

View attachment 1165272

Tylenol wasn't sold as a painedicine until 1956. I was a young child by then.You must be projecting again.

 

[schmidlap]

SOUND MEDICAL SCIENCE vs PRECIPITOUS, HALF-BAKED HYPE​

The epidemiologist who co-authored the study has cautioned that “correlation is not causation” and recommended that additional research be completed before declaring a public victory regarding autism.

Trump decries Tylenol use by pregnant women​

 

[candycorn]

View attachment 1165137

Trump today said he has been able to ling the rapid rise of autism associated with pregnant women taking Tylenol after an exhaustive study of the pregnancy of AOC's mother Blanca. "I popped Tylenol like candy", boasted Blanca. I had to because my back hurt through my whole pregnancy."

Since there were no other apparent links to producing such a mentally deficient offspring, scientists were forced to credit the Tylenol for all of AOC's apparent mental retardation.

No word yet on how many people AOC has convinced to have the state become their lord and savior, if any. But yea, that's just retarded.

 

[candycorn]

MEDICAL SCIENCE vs HALF-BAKED HYPE​

The epidemiologist who co-authored the study has cautioned that “correlation is not causation” and recommended that additional research be completed before declaring a public victory regarding autism.

Trump decries Tylenol use by pregnant women​

We’ve administered acetameophen for children for decades as has every other hospital under the sun in the United States. And like every other hospital under the sun in the US, we will continue to do so.

 

[schmidlap]

We’ve administered acetameophen for children for decades as has every other hospital under the sun in the United States. And like every other hospital under the sun in the US, we will continue to do so.

I have no problem with ongoing, legitimate, clinical and chemical studies by epidemiologists, but politicians and bureaucrats must defer to medical professionals in medical matters.

Some like Trump and Kennedy are often full of shit, particularly in matters in which they have no qualifications.

 

[candycorn]

I have no problem with ongoing, legitimate, clinical and chemical studies by epidemiologists, but politicians and bureaucrats must defer to medical professionals in medical matters.

Some like Trump and Kennedy are often full of shit, particularly in matters in which they have no qualifications.

I think it explains the right wing quite a bit.

All of these folks seem to have neurological disorders; now we know why.

The shootings in Arizona have brought the concept of civility in political discussion to the front of message boards, pundit blogs, and all of the mainstream media formats. While sides can debate and scream over who is to blame, and who's rhetoric is the cause of all the hostility seen poltical disagreements, my impression is that the current state has nothing to do with a persons beliefs, but how they sees the other sides proponents, and the motivations applied to the people on the "other side of the bench"

Listening or reading a person's position on a given topic, and thier opinion on the validity of the opposing postion on the same topic, one more often than not gets the feeling that said person not only thinks their opposites position is wrong, but they are "wrong" as a person in general. That those holding an opposing viewpoint are not just wrong on said point, but have something wrong with themselves at a basic level. The idea that a person just as rational and understanding as you are can hold an opposite position on some topic seems beyond the grasp of some people. It almost gets to the point that in order to justify your own position, some fatal flaw must be found in the person supporting the opposite, that there is no longer the concept of being "wrong" on a topic, but that there has to be some sinister underlying reason for someone to have an opinion differing from yours.

Now as I am not 250 years old, I do not know if this is the same way it always was in our political environment, that this is basically the status quo over 2 and a half centuries of bilateral politics. Maybe the internet has allowed for a more anonymous and vicous type of political commentator to flourish, and this has had an influence on more mainstream media types. Has our political arena gotten meaner? Are we as a people incapable of seeing someone holding a differing opinion than ours as holding a valid, albeit wrong, point?

This brings us to the question; Do you think that the people on the other side of the aisle can have an opinion and not be stupid/evil/greedy/facist/communist/sheeple/goverment agents? I know on some topics there are easily defined right sides and wrong sides, but most of our political discourse is on far greyer areas. Punishing murders is something everyone can agree on, but how to punish is anothering thing entirely. As an example, can reasonable people be on both sides of a debate on the death penalty?

This Templar been a member of this forum for over three years. There have been some rough spots, and some times he's made a complete fool of himself, being caught with his chausses down, and then there have been plenty of times he's learned or thing or two. This Templar has been fortunate to have made a few friends along the way. But over the past few weeks, this Templar has not been his usual self. He's been rude, combative, and overtly hostile with others, and he surmises that some of that has to do with him being diagnosed with a dangerous health condition known as "high cholesterol." He's probably said things that "sorry" just won't cover. He guesses it's because he's angry at himself for the mistakes he's made with his health, and not at anyone here.

This Templar feels like he has worn out his welcome here.

Take an Aleve with an Extra Strength Tylenol that should do it.

Sleep. Water. Tylenol.

Not far behind myself.

I don't buy that Oswald was the "lone nut" in Dallas on 11/22/63. Here are my "headlines". We have more nuts of all types now (political, religious, racist etc...) and we have more gun available. We also have far more public officials with higher profiles now. In the past--1963-1993 or so, someone like AOC or Matt Gertz or whatever his name is would be nobodies. Today, they are the faces of evil for the other side. If we had "lone nuts" back in 1963 why don't we have lone nuts taking pot shots at, not only Biden and Harris, but all of these other people day in and day out? If you buy the lone-nut theory...I think you have failed to account for the reality of 2021 America.

Now, here is what I'm looking for from you...and explanation.

I'll give you mine vis-a-vis Oswald and Kennedy.

Fact. In the month or so before 11/22/63, Oswald went to Mexico City and visited some Eastern Bloc embassies trying to re-defect to Cuba or the USSR. He was turned down.

My theory (this is what I'm looking for from you in regards to 9/11) is that he told someone at the Cuban embassy that he would kill Kennedy. He likely tried to "trade" on his previous attempt in the Spring on General Edwin Walker but Cubans were not impressed. Walker (like most generals) was a devout anti-Communist. So Oswald offered up Kennedy. My theory continues that the Cuban embassy officials in Mexico City didn't contact Havana and likely not the Mexico City station chief. I think one of the staffers there told Oswald, basically to "knock himself out" when it came to killing Kennedy. Much like the same way a police officer does verbal judo with an arrestee while not broadcasting the "official" position of the police department or the mayor. My theory continues that at some point, in Dallas, the unofficial Cubans at the embassy in Mexico City through intermediaries got to Oswald and told him that they would ferry him out of the country after he killed Kennedy.

Fact. Oswald left his rifle in the Texas School book Depository (TSBD). He was seen carrying a large package into the TSBD.

Fact. Oswald left his wedding ring and $170 for his wife before leaving.

Fact. Oswald had a revolver that he didn't bring with him although he could have very easily have brought it with him.

My theory continues that after he killed Kennedy he left the TSBD and expected to be picked up by his unofficial Cuban contact. This was, of course, never going to happen since it was never an official operation by Cuban Intelligence. It was a guy in the Cuban Embassy in Mexico who was free-lancing. So when he knew he'd been had...he starts taking evasive action...taxis, a bus, and ultimately showing up at the Texas Theater--likely where he met the intermediary.

Fact. When arrested, Oswald said "I'm just a Patsy" He didn't say he didn't do it--admittedly he didn't have a lot of time with the press. But it seems to me that he'd say "I didn't do it!"

Conclusion (notice how I incorporate the facts):
If he left behind his rifle and didn't bring his gun, one can logically surmise that he didn't think he'd need them. He thought he'd be on a flight to Havana or Mexico.

Since he left his wedding ring behind and his life savings, one can logically surmise that he didn't think he'd be needing them or predicting he wouldn't return.

The CIA--make what you want out of this--denies he was in Mexico City. PBS Frontline established that he was:
G. ROBERT BLAKEY: We obtained from the Cuban officials the visa application, with his photograph on it and his signature. We verified that it was Oswald's signature. Oswald, therefore, was in Mexico City.

NARRATOR: And records at the Hotel Comercio show the real Oswald was here, too. The handwriting on the register is his.

Oswald stayed in Mexico City four days. But in the end, both the Russians and the Cubans rejected him. All his plans to fight for Castro and return to Russia had come to nothing. He had nowhere to go but back to America. In the early hours of an October morning, Oswald boarded a bus heading north. Next day, he crossed the U.S. border.

Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? | FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site | Documentary Series

An investigative biography examining the life and enduring mysteries of the man who assassinated President Kennedy.

www.pbs.org

---

So is my theory correct? I don't know. I do know that it does acknowledge the facts that are well known....that he left his rifle behind, he didn't take his revolver, that he met with embassy officials of Eastern Bloc nations in Mexico City, that he didn't seem to have a plan for egress from Dallas even though he did leave behind his wedding ring and life savings....

I can get my pain relief from tylenol PM at night these days.

She is super sick and tired. Ugh. She was perfectly fine and didn’t need it as she had COVID19 the same time I did. So annoying. Tylenol did help.

Alternate Advil and Tylenol every 4 hrs.

I take CBD oil capsules along with acetaminophen (Tylenol) when I need an anti-inflammatory with a pain killer.

But I find that Tylenol or its generic acetaminophen coupled with Hemp Oil (non narcotic) tablets as an anti-inflammatory works just as well.

Now I can't take that, so I switched to Tylenol PM.

I have only recently learned the "magic" of taking one Tylenol and one ibuprofen for pain relief! So there is a lot of truth to this.

It’s actually pretty normal.

1000mg IV Tylenol is 100% absorbed into the bloodstream very quickly and is normally all that is required for postoperative pain.

Opioids make me sicker than hell, so I never use them. I use a mix of Tylenol and ibuprofen.

Kirk was a racist, misogynistic, fascist, Nazi, transphobic, anti gay, etc, etc

 

[TemplarKormac]

I think it explains the right wing quite a bit.

All of these folks seem to have neurological disorders; now we know why.

I have a neurological disorder because my mother tried to take stuff to terminate the pregnancy while I was in the womb. Lucky for me she lost the pills.

I'm just here by the grace of God, and product of a dumbass mother.

 

[Muhammed]

Kennedy is a moonbat. He's one of THEM. Trump needs to quit listening to Kennedy and fire him.

 

[22lcidw]

I have no problem with ongoing, legitimate, clinical and chemical studies by epidemiologists, but politicians and bureaucrats must defer to medical professionals in medical matters.

Some like Trump and Kennedy are often full of shit, particularly in matters in which they have no qualifications.

It seems there are many who are qualified who spew different pronouncements on medical subjects when needed. To have a comprehensive look at over the counter and prescribed medications is a good idea.

 

[gtopa1]

Neither Trump nor Kennedy are medically qualified. They offer no chemical analyses to support their notions,

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a statement before the announcement that “acetaminophen remains a safe, trusted option for pain relief during pregnancy.”

Can you link to the studies that contradict that?

Greg