Trump knows wives should tell their husbands who they are voting for

[g5000]

My wife voted Trump (third vote cast at our precinct), and has been bringing people to polls since 6:30am

So you believe.

 

[forkup]

Hrs not a Trump supporter, you blithering idiot!

Trump would be far better because he will put ANERICAN security above the security of any other nation. THST is the proper task of a POTUS. Not BATO. Not the UN. Not Ukraine, Israelnor Taiwan

 

[Jarlaxle]

So you believe.

She's been working for the Trump campaign since April.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Apparently it needs to be. Or maybe USMB can have a training course for the people with no common sense.

It actually used to be, in a sense. My Freshman English out textbook was called “A Rhetoric of Argument” and it was all about how to read critically and provide a logical response.

Sorely missing from todays woke educational agendas, clearly.

 

[Mac1958]

What if the woman is misinformed? If the husband realizes this, he can correct the mistake she is about to make. Let's put our country first!

What if she wants to vote for the person running against the husband's choice?

Should she be allowed to vote?

 

[WorldWatcher]

What if she wants to vote for the person running against the husband's choice?

Should she be allowed to vote?

She will vote how she's told to vote, doesn't get a choice.

WW

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

1950's.

Look at Vance.

What does Vance have to do with it? His wife is a doctor.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And they wonder why they're losing lol

The election is not over, so how are we losing?

 

[Anathema]

Run with that. Shout it from the rooftops.

Don't get me wrong, I truly respect, (not a joke or being sarcastic) someone who's willing to stand up for what they believe. It's refreshing to deal with someone who isn't hypocritical because that plays better in polite company. I value honesty over political expediency.

The fact of the matter is, that you are railing against universal suffrage. Something that's wayyyyyyy over what people call mainstream. And guess what, we have it. So if you want to convince people that woman aren't supposed to vote. Go right ahead. I applaud your honesty. Your argument though belongs in debates 100 years ago. Meaning that you message won't get you elected as a dog-catcher.

Thst is my public as well as private stance. I turned down a very lucrative job about a decade ago because it would have required me to work for a woman. I routinely have to change places I shop or do business because of this issue.

Then again I’m not looking to get elected anything. I have no faith in any part of our government beyond the town level. Not the executives, the legislatures or judicial systems.

 

[Anathema]

We're not going back. Deal with it

Once we correct the government you ladies can go back into the home or out into the street. My wife’s well aware that I would throw her and her entire family (that I largely support) out into the street in an instant without a second thought.

 

[forkup]

Thst is my public as well as private stance. I turned down a very lucrative job about a decade ago because it would have required me to work for a woman. I routinely have to change places I shop or do business because of this issue.

Then again I’m not looking to get elected anything. I have no faith in any part of our government beyond the town level. Not the executives, the legislatures or judicial systems.

As I said. I respect people who stand by their believes no matter what the cost. So let me bring the conversation back to something you said before.

it’s been a problem since the 19th amendment was passed. Women have no legitimate place in American politics. If the did, the Founders would have spelled it out

Since you are referring to the constitution I will ask if you are aware that those founders also established an amendment procedure? And I will further ask as to why you suppose they did that?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Boy, these last few days. What in the world are they doing?

The Democrats tried to make it an issue with their stupid campaign ad which alleged conservative men have absolute control over their wives. That could not be further from the truth because we know most liberal men fall into the cuck category. They do whatever their abortion seeking wives want in having them to vote for Kamala.

 

[Arlette]

Once we correct the government you ladies can go back into the home or out into the street. My wife’s well aware that I would throw her and her entire family (that I largely support) out into the street in an instant without a second thought.

^^ blah blah blah

We're not going back

 

[forkup]

The Democrats tried to make it an issue with their stupid campaign ad which alleged conservative men have absolute control over their wives. That could not be further from the truth because we know most liberal men fall into the cuck category. They do whatever their abortion seeking wives want in having them to vote for Kamala.

Yet I see no Democratic men complaining about their wives voting. Plenty Republicans. Why is that?

 

[Anathema]

As I said. I respect people who stand by their believes no matter what the cost. So let me bring the conversation back to something you said before.


Since you are referring to the constitution I will ask if you are aware that those founders also established an amendment procedure? And I will further ask as to why you suppose they did that?

Because they were fools. The Amendment process is the worst part of the document. They were utterly naive in believing that people wouldn’t incorrectly use that process; just as they were naive to lay out “Rights” without laying out “Duties and Responsibilities “.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This little kerfuffle has certainly been an interesting sideshow in an otherwise ugly and tedious campaign season.

First, I wonder who came up with this idea for the Dems. Talk about target marketing -- this is both surgical and very insightful. And watching the GQP response has been hilarious. They're very angry about any suggestion that a wife think for herself and not mindlessly comply with the instruction of their husband.

Of course, mindless compliance is a requirement for being a proper MAGA.

Wow! Did you get it backwards! The GOP (I have no idea what the GQP is, despite you thinking it is cute) is pissed because the Dems think all conservative women absolutely abide by their husband's wishes. The Dems suggesting they should vote for Kamal and simply lie about it is in keeping with their lack of moral rectitude common to liberals.

My wife is a Republican as am I. When we voted, she had always told me she wanted to vote a straight Republican ticket, but on the ballot, you have to select them all individually. She really didn't care about the other offices and voted for Trump only. I did not do that, but I also realize there is not a damned thing I can do about it. Howeve, if she told me she voted for Harris, I would have considered that grounds for divorce, because I will not be married to someone with a room temperature IQ.

 

[forkup]

Because they were fools. The Amendment process is the worst part of the document. They were utterly naive in believing that people wouldn’t incorrectly use that process; just as they were naive to lay out “Rights” without laying out “Duties and Responsibilities “.

So, you are supporting the original document written by "fools?" Can you explain what in your view was done incorrectly?

(I'm taking this step by step and leaving out several different lines of questioning, so we don't get sidetracked)

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

does mrs partiv understand her subservient role , that she needs your permission to vote and such?

my wife mist be a sinful woman. is stoning the answer?

What? You don't always keep your wife stoned to put up with you? (Reminder: You brought her into the discussion.)

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

What if the man is uninformed?

No such thing in this world, unless he is a Democrat.

 

[Anathema]

So, you are supporting the original document written by "fools?" Can you explain what in your view was done incorrectly?

(I'm taking this step by step, so we don't get sidetracked)

Many things were done incorrectly. As I’ve already pointed out… the inclusion of an amendment process and a list of rights without a list of duties and responsibilities. I’m against the inclusion of “rights” at all but the lack or the expectations of the citizenry towards the government is a massive omission. Article I, Section 8’s wording is atrocious at best and that has lead to misunderstandings which have inflated the federal government’s power and budget like a hot air balloon. Additionally, the lack of an absolute isolationism clause was a major mistake.

That should be a good enough start for you.

P.S. - remember that I’m an avowed Conservative, Traditionalist, Nationalist, Isolationist, Authoritarian