Trump judge rules it's unconstitutional to deploy National Guard in Portland

[FoghornLeghorn]

I presume this too will be overruled and why not? Portland officials are NOT protecting the rights of local citizens, which is supposed to be the first responsibility of government. They have abandoned their oaths to the constitution and it appears that this quack judge (probably recommended by Deep State goon Barr) has also a abandoned her oath.

Federal judge rules Trump's Portland National Guard deployment unconstitutional in permanent injunction

A federal judge ruled on Friday the Trump administration's National Guard deployment to Portland violated the 10th Amendment after a 3-day trial over ICE building protests.

www.foxnews.com

 

[cnm]

I presume this too will be overruled and why not? Portland officials are NOT protecting the rights of local citizens, which is supposed to be the first responsibility of government. They have abandoned their oaths to the constitution and it appears that this quack judge (probably recommended by Deep State goon Barr) has also a abandoned her oath.

Federal judge rules Trump's Portland National Guard deployment unconstitutional in permanent injunction

A federal judge ruled on Friday the Trump administration's National Guard deployment to Portland violated the 10th Amendment after a 3-day trial over ICE building protests.

www.foxnews.com

No, it's the lives and rights of citizens. Stopping tyrannical federal thugs from interacting with their citizens is protecting their citizens' lives and rights.

 

[Darkwind]

No, it's the lives and rights of citizens. Stopping tyrannical federal thugs from interacting with their citizens is protecting their citizens' lives and rights.

Not when the citizens are actively impeding law enforcement from doing their legitimate enforcement duties.

Your notion is that anarchy should reign supreme.

 

[cnm]

Not when the citizens are actively impeding law enforcement from doing their legitimate enforcement duties.

Your notion is that anarchy should reign supreme.

Tyrannical federal thugs don't have legitimate enforcement duties. That's why the security of a free state depends on the ability to bear arms.

 

[Meathead]

No, it's the lives and rights of citizens. Stopping tyrannical federal thugs from interacting with their citizens is protecting their citizens' lives and rights.

No, it's about protecting illegal aliens who don't even have the right to be in the country.

 

[cnm]

No, it's about protecting illegal aliens who don't even have the right to be in the country.

That has to be adjudicated, Shirley?

Oh. Right. That's only in a nation of laws. My bad.

After all, it's not like the US Constitution applies to everyone in the country, possibly excluding diplomats.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Tyrannical federal thugs don't have legitimate enforcement duties. That's why the security of a free state depends on the ability to bear arms.

With all due respect, Cnm...the very same people who are preventing Trump from protecting citizens with the National Guard are the ones demanding that those same citizens shouldn't have guns.

 

[Delldude]

No, it's the lives and rights of citizens. Stopping tyrannical federal thugs from interacting with their citizens is protecting their citizens' lives and rights.

And that's why the NG is deployed there.

 

[Blaster]

Just another activist judge that will be overruled.

 

[Oddball]

Tyrannical federal thugs don't have legitimate enforcement duties. That's why the security of a free state depends on the ability to bear arms.

Federal "thugs" have every right to enforce immigration laws, and the states have no right to interfere...I seem to remember an AZ case when they tried enforcing their border, and you shitlibs demanded they stop for this very reason.

If those authorities are being interfered with by "protesters" there's every legal right to disperse and arrest them.