This is Trump's big ask.
Aren't any of you paying attention?
What are you all talking about right now?
Is it recess appointments by any chance?
And the fact that Congress isn't doing it's job?
What brought this conversation about?
Was it Trump controlling the narrative by making a simple declarative sentence?
Has he used any power to do anything? No?
And yet, here we are discussing the do-nothing Congress not getting their job done.
The guy is a genius.
He sure used more than one simple declarative sentence to tell us how Congress, well the Democrats, are keeping his nominees waiting two years or more. He also threatened to use power he hasn't got to adjourn Congress and make recess appointments, which are temporary.
Yeah, we're TALKING about it.
And if he just said "Congress needs to move on confirming my nominees", do you think that thread would have more than two replies? I don't. It would be completely ignored.
Just like Trump saying he Was going to quarantine New York City... did he do it? No.
But he drew attention to the problem...and the next day other state governments were interdicting New York, New Jersey and Louisiana residents and ensuring they weren't infected and spreading the virus to other states.
Making these outlandish claims ensures they are not ignored...on the contrary...they spread like wildfire. He is not overstepping his authornarrative.mNG he is considering an action.
He is using TDS to get his message out and to control the narrative.
Right- Trump is just threatening to circumvent the Constitution in order to get his way. He hasn't actually done it yet.
My understanding is he has the legal authority under certain circumstances to do what he says. If it is legally possible, how could it be circumventing the Constitution?
First of all- Trump flat out announced that the reason he was doing this was to circumvent the Constitutional requirements that his appointments be confirmed by the Senate. Remember- we all learned this during the Obama Presidency when the Senate refused to confirm Obama's nominations- including Garland.
One of the things Obama did to try to get around the Senate refusing to consider his nominees was to make recess appointments when the Senate was not actually meeting but having the same kind of pro-forma meetings that they are having now.
The Senate went to the Supreme Court to fight that- and won.
Trump's attempt to circumvent the Senate and the Constitution is to claim he can adjourn the Senate. The claim is based upon very narrow language in the Constitution and is as legally suspect as Obama's arguments when he made recess appointments.
What is really weird is that the Republicans control the Senate- and Trump has had no problem with the Senate ramming through his judicial nominees- even those who didn't have a day of trial experience. Who are these nominees that Trump can't get the Senate to vote on?
And why isn't Trump doing what he has been doing for the last three years to avoid confirmation hearings- using temporary appointments?