Trump is DOJ target

You have 28% of the military, and probably even LESS of the rank and file. Dream on

On the other hand, roughly 28 percent intend to vote for Democrats, despite only one-fifth being considered in the percent of the military that is a democrat. Thus, we can assume that more of the military are conservatives.
100% of the military are soldiers. They follow orders.

Next
 

with some terrible violent fantasies. But what is always interesting is THESE cretins are the ones who are opposed to secession.

They're leeches. They hate us but they know they need us.

We, however, most assuredly do not need them.

Since we have discovered this they are terrified. Hence the comments on "droning"
 
100% of the military are soldiers. They follow orders.

Next

You think the US military would "follow orders" to DRONE their own fellow citizens.

Did you complete 8th grade?

6th grade?
 
This is BS. I've cited in previous posts the language by judges in court orders that talks about the "evidence" presented to them. Invariably they found it lacking.
The cases were not rejected on merit.
 
Nothing to be done about it.

The split is coming. I no longer care.
You don't care you need have constructed a political belief system that isn't amenable to reason? Sue do you realize that that is a bad thing?
 
You don't care you need have constructed a political belief system that isn't amenable to reason? Sue do you realize that that is a bad thing?

Again

Why are leftists so boring?

Your shaming routine is so boring.
 
Figures. An entitlement cow like you thinks you have a right to be entertained.

You're not insightful, you're not funny, you have nothing new to offer. You suck up bandwidth for what, then?

HAR HAR DRONE YOUR ASSES HAR HAR
 
You're not insightful, you're not funny, you have nothing new to offer. You suck up bandwidth for what, then?

HAR HAR DRONE YOUR ASSES HAR HAR
You got a big hair growing on your chin. You should plug it
 
Not our problem when Trump's dime store lawyers can't even get an amicus brief straight.
You mean their brief was torpedoed by a Trump appointed but Trump hating judge? Cannon should have been impeached for issuing a paperless order with only one sentence to explain why she didn't want ex-federal and state officials to weigh in.
 
Last edited:
You mean their brief

No, they were rejected for ill defined 'procedural' issues.
Most were rejected for lack of standing. Standing is not some "procedural" issue. It's fundamental to our system of justice.
 
Most were rejected for lack of standing. Standing is not some "procedural" issue. It's fundamental to our system of justice.
You don’t know what lack of standing means. It has nothing to with evidence or a lack of evidence.
 
Back
Top Bottom