Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here's one exampleGreat, let's see that cite?
Try looking up Marbury v Madison.I kept trying to click your post, but the link isn't working....
The current President has sole authority over claims of executive privilege for past or present documents. If some documents should be excluded from the investigation as the DoJ review revealed, those docs will not be included. But no matter what qualifications the docs have all official docs belong to the National Archives.I think you're confusing executive privilege. That pertains to documents that deal with advice / communications between the president and the presidents cabinet and advisors. Communications offering advice or guidance, that might shape decisions by the president.
Here's one example
They sued and won, convincing the state Supreme Court that McAuliffe had overstepped his clemency powers. It found that the governor can only restore voting rights on a case-by-case basis, not en masse.
Try looking up Marbury v Madison.
Actually, as what seems to be the point of the thread. The presidential records act, grants the ex-president, certain controls over his presidential records, within the National Archives.The current President has sole authority over claims of executive privilege for past or present documents. If some documents should be excluded from the investigation as the DoJ review revealed, those docs will not be included. But no matter what qualifications the docs have all official docs belong to the National Archives.
That's what backagain tried to claim. You can look back to see that Adams nominated William Marbury to a justice of the peace position, and the senate confirmed his appointed. But his paperwork was never delivered to him. So he sued to force the government to deliver his papers.So, you acknowledge you pulled it out of your ass.
You're dismissed.
Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978 | National Archives
www.archives.gov
The presidential records act keeps the National Archive from releasing any presidential records for the first 5 years. And gives the president and the ex-president the right to invoke claims of executive privilege over PRA documents in the hands of the National Archives.
The current documents seized by the FBI and in the hands of the FBI, which being in the executive branch, the supreme court gave the current president sole authority over invoking executive privilege over executive branch records.
In brief, Trump has executive privilege over the records he turned over to the National Archives, but Biden has executive privilege over the records Trump failed to turn over to the National Archives. Which makes a special master moot when it comes to determining executive privilege over the documents seized by the FBI.
dailycaller.com
Trump has no control over the documents the FBI seized. He has no ownership rights over any presidential record, nor can he claim executive privilege over them.‘He Is The Executive Branch’: CNN Legal Analyst Undercuts Hype Over Trump Allegedly Possessing Classified Docs
A CNN legal analyst said that former President Donald Trump had “very broad” authority to declassify documents Monday night.
except he does. the courts will tell you that shortly.Trump has no control over the documents the FBI seized. He has no ownership rights over any presidential record, nor can he claim executive privilege over them.
Sorry Charlie.
The current President has sole authority over claims of executive privilege for past or present documents. If some documents should be excluded from the investigation as the DoJ review revealed, those docs will not be included. But no matter what qualifications the docs have all official docs belong to the National Archives.
all documents from a former president are declassified. How else does the archive get them?The poor quality of Trump's team of attorneys, a self inflicted wound because of his track record as a client, is in full view right now.
Former President Donald J. Trump may have thought that he was playing offense when he asked a federal judge last week for an independent review of documents seized from his residence in Florida — a move that, at best, could delay but not derail an investigation into his handling of the records.
But on Tuesday night, the Justice Department used a routine court filing in the matter to initiate a blistering counteroffensive that disclosed new evidence that Mr. Trump and his legal team may have interfered with the inquiry.
In the filing, in Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, department officials revealed more details about the classified materials that Mr. Trump had taken from the White House, including a remarkable photograph of several of them arrayed on the floor of Mar-a-Lago, his home and private club in Florida. In what read at times like a road map for a potential prosecution down the road, the filing also laid out evidence that Mr. Trump and his lawyers may have obstructed justice.
It was as if Mr. Trump, seeming not to fully grasp the potential hazards of his modest legal move, cracked open a door, allowing the Justice Department to push past him and seize the initiative.
Trump’s Legal Jab Left Him Open to Justice Dept. Strike (Published 2022)
A legal back-and-forth produced a straightforward narrative of how Mr. Trump and his lawyers repeatedly dodged the government’s attempts to recover sensitive documents for more than a year.www.nytimes.com
Trump has no control over the documents the FBI seized. He has no ownership rights over any presidential record, nor can he claim executive privilege over them.
Sorry Charlie.
DOJ already made clear in their 36 page response, that Trump has little standing in the matter. He doesn't own the presidential records, and he has no executive privilege over them.except he does. the courts will tell you that shortly.
One problem with your statement. The PRA requires that the president do that WHILE IN OFFICE. And to keep personal papers completely separate from president records.Sure, but all presidential docs do NOT belong to the NARA.
For example, communications between an ex-president and lawyers, while president.
And only the ex-president can go through them and sort.
This super master may be a compromise?
Don't be a fool. The National Archives has a classified records office.all documents from a former president are declassified. How else does the archive get them?
Trump continually violated the PRA.He can't claim executive privilege, but can claim client/attorney privilege, individual privacy, etc.
He can also claim rights to memoirs, future evidence, etc.
The only thing the FBI can use to justify this is if they can prove he was deliberately going to try to violate FOIA.
As they attempted to use their Jedi magic to say, we don’t need a special master, the president pee memoirDOJ already made clear in their 36 page response, that Trump has little standing in the matter. He doesn't own the presidential records, and he has no executive privilege over them.
NopeTrump continually violated the PRA.
That limits his rights.
The time to separate personal from presidential records was before he left office, not after. So while they may grant Trump access to go through his documents (or actually the person named to oversee his presidential records) there will be limits on sorting documents that should have been sorted long ago.
