Trump forced to defend VP comments after cat lady attack

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
54,505
Reaction score
24,733
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras

That isnt how it is supposed to work. The VP is supposed to support the candidate not drag them down.

We all know people who cant have children. It seems perverse to attack them when you are busy banning IVF. That is just a fact.

But people who choose not to have kids are fine too. Its all good. Women arent breeding units. Dont the GOP want their votes ?
 

That isnt how it is supposed to work. The VP is supposed to support the candidate not drag them down.

We all know people who cant have children. It seems perverse to attack them when you are busy banning IVF. That is just a fact.

But people who choose not to have kids are fine too. Its all good. Women arent breeding units. Dont the GOP want their votes ?


He wasn't talking about women who can't have children.
 
That isnt how it is supposed to work. The VP is supposed to support the candidate not drag them down.

We all know people who cant have children. It seems perverse to attack them when you are busy banning IVF. That is just a fact.

But people who choose not to have kids are fine too. Its all good. Women arent breeding units. Dont the GOP want their votes ?
1. Trump clarified that Republicans are pro-family and pro-family values, unlike the deviant democrats.
2. The MSM took Trump's statements out of context when all we saw was Trump saying that Evangelicals "wouldn't need to vote again after 2024." Implying that Trump would stop future elections. What Trump actually said is that Christians generally don't vote. So after voting in 2024 he meant that they could go back to not voting.
 

That isnt how it is supposed to work. The VP is supposed to support the candidate not drag them down.

We all know people who cant have children. It seems perverse to attack them when you are busy banning IVF. That is just a fact.

But people who choose not to have kids are fine too. Its all good. Women arent breeding units. Dont the GOP want their votes ?
"we love our cat ladies don't we , folks? thise sleek patent leather outfits and whips with with an nft of your favorite president on the handle ....."
 
1. Trump clarified that Republicans are pro-family and pro-family values, unlike the deviant democrats.
2. The MSM took Trump's statements out of context when all we saw was Trump saying that Evangelicals "wouldn't need to vote again after 2024." Implying that Trump would stop future elections. What Trump actually said is that Christians generally don't vote. So after voting in 2024 he meant that they could go back to not voting.
Pro family ? We are all pro family. But most of us are pro family without insuting a large demographic. I understand vance was dragged up. Maybe thats where he learned to be a pig ?
 
Pro family ? We are all pro family. But most of us are pro family without insulting a large demographic. I understand Vance was dragged up. Maybe that's where he learned to be a pig ?
1. How is Vance a pig? Maybe you're confusing him with the King's consort?

2. I agree that Vance mis-spoke in 2021 when he said that "Cat Lady" comment.
Trump and Vance need to learn that every vote matters and to focus on policy differences, not alienating voters.
In a 2021 interview with Fox News host Tucker Carlson, then-Senate-candidate Vance complained that the U.S. was being run by Democrats, corporate oligarchs and "a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too."
 

That isnt how it is supposed to work. The VP is supposed to support the candidate not drag them down.

We all know people who cant have children. It seems perverse to attack them when you are busy banning IVF. That is just a fact.

But people who choose not to have kids are fine too. Its all good. Women arent breeding units. Dont the GOP want their votes ?
They want to drastically limit the way people are allowed to live their lives. Living freely and happily goes against their religious/political beliefs.
 
They want to drastically limit the way people are allowed to live their lives. Living freely and happily goes against their religious/political beliefs.

BAKE THAT FUCKING CAKE PEASANT
GIVE UP YOUR ICE VEHICLE
GIVE UP YOUR AC
NO MORE DISPOSABLE BAGS FOR YOU
STOP EATING MEAT
 
BAKE THAT FUCKING CAKE PEASANT
GIVE UP YOUR ICE VEHICLE
GIVE UP YOUR AC
NO MORE DISPOSABLE BAGS FOR YOU
STOP EATING MEAT
Your purely evil bitchass is trying to shape this country into an Iran style theocracy and you want me to focus on disposable bags? Go fuck yourself :fu:
 
Your purely evil bitchass is trying to shape this country into an Iran style theocracy and you want me to focus on disposable bags? Go fuck yourself :fu:

Ah the Theocracy trope, meanwhile anyone against the LGBTalphabet people are ruined.
 
Which is total bullshit...so your twisting of what Trump said is bullshit as well.
That is exactly what Trump said in the interview with Laura Ingraham last night.

What proof do you have what he meant, since you call bullshit?
 
That is exactly what Trump said in the interview with Laura Ingraham last night.

What proof do you have what he meant, since you call bullshit?

Yes Trump is doing damage control after a video gets out that he did not what the whole world to see.

He meant what he said, if he gets what he wants there will no longer be any need for people to vote...as there will be no elections.
 

That isnt how it is supposed to work. The VP is supposed to support the candidate not drag them down.

We all know people who cant have children. It seems perverse to attack them when you are busy banning IVF. That is just a fact.

But people who choose not to have kids are fine too. Its all good. Women arent breeding units. Dont the GOP want their votes ?

Who's banning IVF (besides the muslim fundamentalists you love)?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom