Trump lost a fair election in 2020. He never had the integrity to admit it.
Probably. He didn't believe so. He had a lot of inside intelligence, and I don't know what he knew. I know what I read, and I know that it might be possible that he might have known something that I don't know, I can't say for sure. This is America, and we are all free to believe what we like.
The stakes for the Presidency, are the highest in the land. The establishment even admitted that they manipulated the media and the perceptions of the population. We now know this from that
Time Magazine article, and the Twitter file investigation, so, I don't really know what might, or might not have happened, TBH.
I didn't vote for him, nor did I care for the man, but I don't know who is telling the truth. I have no concrete proof either way.
This is NOT, however, the subject of the thread. I will, however, give you just a sample of what has not, and will not be refuted by the establishment. These are corporate media and government docs. . .
Evidence from the MSM, and our our own government, which Trump and those who follow him KNOW about. It has not, and will not be refuted.
The fact is, American corporations care more about their power and profits, than electoral integrity and electoral transparency. That is a fact.
Whistleblower Hero is Threatened with Prison for Exposing Diebold
One question to ask is whether it is a crime to attempt to stop a crime? In this case, Stephen Heller deserves a medal of gratitude instead of jail.
One question to ask is whether it is a crime to attempt to stop a crime? In this case, Stephen Heller deserves a medal of gratitude instead of jail.
www.huffpost.com
Diebold Whistleblower Strikes Plea Deal on Felony Charges
Diebold Whistleblower Strikes Plea Deal on Felony Charges
Diebold Whistleblower Strikes Plea Deal on Felony Charges
www.huffpost.com
(From a previous post as folllows . . .)"
web.archive.org
Someone removed the evidence from the archives. . . . for click link about ^, screenshot below.
www.dominionvoting.com:80/images/pdfs/DominionAcquiresPremierReleaseFinal4.pdf
The department said that today’s settlement will restore competition in voting equipment systems in the U.S. and that, without the divestiture, the acquisition would result in higher prices, lower quality and a reduced incentive to innovate.
www.justice.gov
". . . ES&S must sell the divestiture assets to a buyer approved by the department. The settlement prohibits ES&S from bidding on new voting equipment system contracts using the Premier equipment. The department also required that ES&S grant the divestiture buyer an opportunity to compete to provide services to Premier customers currently under contract with ES&S, giving customers the option to switch to the divestiture buyer or to remain with ES&S.. . . "
There's the proof, right from the government, requiring the permission of the Obama DoJ, to whom ES&S can sell it's assets too. . .
The Department of Justice's Anti-trust division has determined that the purchase of Premier Election Solutions, Diebold Inc.'s recently renamed e-voting division, by Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S), has resulted in a voting machine monopoly. ...
www.scoop.co.nz
“Intellectual Property” of voting systems still owned by firm linked to Venezuelan President, despite press statement to the contrary PLUS: The election official/e-voting company revolving “oversight”…
truthout.org
Not to worry, saved the assets sale proof here;
And the corruption? From MSM everyone follows, LA Times and HuffPo. . .
Whistle-Blower or Thief in Diebold Case?
Stephen Heller's alleged theft of papers about the firm's electronic voting machines spurs praise and scorn as he faces felony charges.
www.latimes.com
'They think they are above the law': the firms that own America's voting system
In the second of a two-part series: How a few private companies that have little oversight and keep information secret run US elections
www.theguardian.com
These same questions asked by PBS itself, of Dominion, in Georgia itself. . .
One week before the election, PBS does a deep dive on Georgia's use of Dominion Voting Systems
..."
Now, this is just the case for corrupted election machines. This does not include the case for vote harvesting, or possibly running fake ballots through corrupted vote tally machine multiple times.
You have every right to repeat the establishment line, that the election was completely above board and fair. You have every right to believe that.
What you do not have a right to do, is criminalize those who do not agree with you. Just as when those who won elections who you did not like, had no right to tell others what to believe. That is not how America has ever been run.
www.npr.org
