hey you know the difference between a
protest and a calculated preplanned paramilitary attack right. if not don't worry. the "president" and his administration don't seem to either.
the gray lady salzbuger debacle... yuk, really sad.
hey did you know that the
nyt benedict arnold gazette used eminent domain to for people and families from their generational homes and businesses.. really sad for everyone.
Of course there is a difference between a riot and a calculated military attack. However, if you looked at the pictures and read the descriptions in the link, it's easy to see that there are lots of similarities as well. It is perfectly understandable to think the Benghazi attack was just one more of the several riots at American embassies in the Mid East caused by that video, at least for a while.
I'm not familiar with any grey lady salsberg debacle or any benedict Arnold gazette, and don't know what they might have to do with this particular subject. Care to explain what they are, and how they relate to Benghazi?
Are you still buying Hillary's bullshit? Its been proven that the video had nothing to do with the Benghazi attack. The people on the ground have testified about it. It had nothing to do with the video.
Damn, but you libs are thick headed, or blind ass stupid.
Nobody has said the Benghazi attack was only another riot caused by that video since the first day or two when the information was being collected. The link I gave you is plenty of reason to understand why that's what the first thought was. As soon as more information was gathered, the claims were corrected. NOBODY has said it was caused by that video for years. Don't you understand that?
nobody but hillary and obama, where have you been? those claims have never been withdrawn or corrected, Susan Rice still maintains what she was sent out to pitch was true.
They might actually gain some credibility if they would admit that they were wrong about the video, but they won't because dems and libs are never wrong.
I guess fox forgot to mention when that happened. At the very first, there was a lot of information to evaluate, and it took a while to determine exactly what did happen. Rice said what the CIA told her to say, but yes, after the investigations were concluded, they all have said it was a terrorist attack, and have said nothing but that since.
Benghazi Timeline
Sept. 21: Clinton,
speaking to reporters before a meeting with Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar, calls it a “terrorist attack” for the first time. She says, “Yesterday afternoon when I briefed the Congress, I made it clear that keeping our people everywhere in the world safe is our top priority. What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans.”
Jay Carney was Press Secretary and spokesman for the White House - Obama
Sept. 26: Carney is asked at a
press briefing aboard Air Force One en route to Ohio why the president has not called the Benghazi incident a “terrorist attack.” He said, “The president — our position is, as reflected by the NCTC director, that it was a terrorist attack. It is, I think by definition, a terrorist attack when there is a prolonged assault on an embassy with weapons. … So, let’s be clear, it was a terrorist attack and it was an inexcusable attack.”
Sept. 27: At a press briefing, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
says that “it was a terrorist attack,” but declines to say when he came to that conclusion. “It took a while to really get some of the feedback from what exactly happened at that location,” he said. “As we determined the details of what took place there, and how that attack took place, that it became clear that there were terrorists who had planned that attack.”
Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at the same briefing addresses what the U.S. knew in advance of the Benghazi attack. He says there was “a thread of intelligence reporting that groups in … eastern Libya were seeking to coalesce, but there wasn’t anything specific and certainly not a specific threat to the consulate that I’m aware of.”
