Trump continues to play the media for fools.

odanny

Diamond Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
21,977
Reaction score
17,763
Points
2,290
Location
Midwest - Trumplandia
The media continues their fools errand in covering Donald Trump. Every poke he takes at them, and us, the media continues to jump and scream hysterically. Are they doing this in the public interest, or is it to amplify the ramblings of this damaged President and sell more newspapers? It seems like a Faustian bargain at the end.

Do you know how many states it takes to repeal a Constitutional amendment? I suppose if you "rig" the vote, you could overturn one. I know of a guy who is always talking about rigged elections, in fact, he was mentioning one that happened in 2020.




President Donald Trump has suggested that “methods” exist by which he could attempt to serve a third term in the White House, an act that is barred by the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“I’m not joking,” Trump said, in a Sunday interview with NBC News, when asked to clarify speculative comments on the possibility.

Constitutional scholars say any third run for the presidency would violate both the spirit and the letter of the amendment, which was passed after World War II as a protection against “elective monarchy.” Here’s what to know.

The amendment was passed by Congress in 1947 and became part of the Constitution in 1951, when it was fully ratified by the states.

In interaction with the 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, the 22nd Amendment also has potential legal implications for who can seek the office of vice president. According to the 12th Amendment, “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President.”

In 1940 and 1944, as the world was thrust into global conflict, Roosevelt took the unusual steps of seeking third and then fourth terms, citing the need for stability.

After Roosevelt’s death and the end of the war in 1945, Republicans in Congress moved in 1947 to establish constitutional term limits, as they had promised in their 1940 and 1944 party platforms, “to insure against the overthrow of our American system of government.” They argued that the presidential term limit would help safeguard the United States from dictatorship and that it merely codified the two-term tradition already established by Washington.

That year, the House voted 285-121 in support of a measure proposed by Rep. Earl C. Michener limiting the presidency to two four-year terms. The next month, the Senate approved an amended version, with only Democrats opposing the measure. In 1951, Minnesota became the 36th state to ratify the proposed amendment, and it was declared effective on March 1.

WaPo
 
The media continues their fools errand in covering Donald Trump. Every poke he takes at them, and us, the media continues to jump and scream hysterically. Are they doing this in the public interest, or is it to amplify the ramblings of this damaged President and sell more newspapers? It seems like a Faustian bargain at the end.

Do you know how many states it takes to repeal a Constitutional amendment? I suppose if you "rig" the vote, you could overturn one. I know of a guy who is always talking about rigged elections, in fact, he was mentioning one that happened in 2020.




President Donald Trump has suggested that “methods” exist by which he could attempt to serve a third term in the White House, an act that is barred by the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“I’m not joking,” Trump said, in a Sunday interview with NBC News, when asked to clarify speculative comments on the possibility.

Constitutional scholars say any third run for the presidency would violate both the spirit and the letter of the amendment, which was passed after World War II as a protection against “elective monarchy.” Here’s what to know.

The amendment was passed by Congress in 1947 and became part of the Constitution in 1951, when it was fully ratified by the states.

In interaction with the 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, the 22nd Amendment also has potential legal implications for who can seek the office of vice president. According to the 12th Amendment, “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President.”

In 1940 and 1944, as the world was thrust into global conflict, Roosevelt took the unusual steps of seeking third and then fourth terms, citing the need for stability.

After Roosevelt’s death and the end of the war in 1945, Republicans in Congress moved in 1947 to establish constitutional term limits, as they had promised in their 1940 and 1944 party platforms, “to insure against the overthrow of our American system of government.” They argued that the presidential term limit would help safeguard the United States from dictatorship and that it merely codified the two-term tradition already established by Washington.

That year, the House voted 285-121 in support of a measure proposed by Rep. Earl C. Michener limiting the presidency to two four-year terms. The next month, the Senate approved an amended version, with only Democrats opposing the measure. In 1951, Minnesota became the 36th state to ratify the proposed amendment, and it was declared effective on March 1.

WaPo
Unfortunately he is the president and what he says gets covered. Republicans do control Congress at this point so such a measure could pass, and Republican states would ratify it. But I don't think there are 37 Republican states.
 
The media continues their fools errand in covering Donald Trump. Every poke he takes at them, and us, the media continues to jump and scream hysterically. Are they doing this in the public interest, or is it to amplify the ramblings of this damaged President and sell more newspapers? It seems like a Faustian bargain at the end.

Do you know how many states it takes to repeal a Constitutional amendment? I suppose if you "rig" the vote, you could overturn one. I know of a guy who is always talking about rigged elections, in fact, he was mentioning one that happened in 2020.




President Donald Trump has suggested that “methods” exist by which he could attempt to serve a third term in the White House, an act that is barred by the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“I’m not joking,” Trump said, in a Sunday interview with NBC News, when asked to clarify speculative comments on the possibility.

Constitutional scholars say any third run for the presidency would violate both the spirit and the letter of the amendment, which was passed after World War II as a protection against “elective monarchy.” Here’s what to know.

The amendment was passed by Congress in 1947 and became part of the Constitution in 1951, when it was fully ratified by the states.

In interaction with the 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, the 22nd Amendment also has potential legal implications for who can seek the office of vice president. According to the 12th Amendment, “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President.”

In 1940 and 1944, as the world was thrust into global conflict, Roosevelt took the unusual steps of seeking third and then fourth terms, citing the need for stability.

After Roosevelt’s death and the end of the war in 1945, Republicans in Congress moved in 1947 to establish constitutional term limits, as they had promised in their 1940 and 1944 party platforms, “to insure against the overthrow of our American system of government.” They argued that the presidential term limit would help safeguard the United States from dictatorship and that it merely codified the two-term tradition already established by Washington.

That year, the House voted 285-121 in support of a measure proposed by Rep. Earl C. Michener limiting the presidency to two four-year terms. The next month, the Senate approved an amended version, with only Democrats opposing the measure. In 1951, Minnesota became the 36th state to ratify the proposed amendment, and it was declared effective on March 1.

WaPo
It's just to try to distract folks from the crashing economy and such.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
It's just to try to distract folks from the crashing economy and such.
Exactly, but Trump is still reeling them in after he chums the water, and the lamestream media (ha ha wing nuts) runs his idiotic sound bites at the top of every newscast.
 
The media continues their fools errand in covering Donald Trump. Every poke he takes at them, and us, the media continues to jump and scream hysterically. Are they doing this in the public interest, or is it to amplify the ramblings of this damaged President and sell more newspapers? It seems like a Faustian bargain at the end.

Do you know how many states it takes to repeal a Constitutional amendment? I suppose if you "rig" the vote, you could overturn one. I know of a guy who is always talking about rigged elections, in fact, he was mentioning one that happened in 2020.




President Donald Trump has suggested that “methods” exist by which he could attempt to serve a third term in the White House, an act that is barred by the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“I’m not joking,” Trump said, in a Sunday interview with NBC News, when asked to clarify speculative comments on the possibility.

Constitutional scholars say any third run for the presidency would violate both the spirit and the letter of the amendment, which was passed after World War II as a protection against “elective monarchy.” Here’s what to know.

The amendment was passed by Congress in 1947 and became part of the Constitution in 1951, when it was fully ratified by the states.

In interaction with the 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, the 22nd Amendment also has potential legal implications for who can seek the office of vice president. According to the 12th Amendment, “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President.”

In 1940 and 1944, as the world was thrust into global conflict, Roosevelt took the unusual steps of seeking third and then fourth terms, citing the need for stability.

After Roosevelt’s death and the end of the war in 1945, Republicans in Congress moved in 1947 to establish constitutional term limits, as they had promised in their 1940 and 1944 party platforms, “to insure against the overthrow of our American system of government.” They argued that the presidential term limit would help safeguard the United States from dictatorship and that it merely codified the two-term tradition already established by Washington.

That year, the House voted 285-121 in support of a measure proposed by Rep. Earl C. Michener limiting the presidency to two four-year terms. The next month, the Senate approved an amended version, with only Democrats opposing the measure. In 1951, Minnesota became the 36th state to ratify the proposed amendment, and it was declared effective on March 1.

WaPo

Lol, are democrats afraid TRUMP would win another election?
 
Couchboi has the personality of a mildly retarded rugby hooligan.

His chances of getting elected are very slim.
Rugby hooligans are offended by this ciomprison. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Lol, are democrats afraid TRUMP would win another election?
If you had a brain, you would be scared too, but you are all for the dictatorship just as long as trump doesn't abuse white people.
 
If you had a brain, you would be scared too, but you are all for the dictatorship just as long as trump doesn't abuse white people.
Sorry forgot my shout out to all the black MEN who voted for TRUMP and deserve credit for saving the country!!!
As for your comment it's interesting considering the protests against TRUMP and Musk are almost exclusively WHITE people.
 
Sorry forgot my shout out to all the black MEN who voted for TRUMP and deserve credit for saving the country!!!
As for your comment it's interesting considering the protests against TRUMP and Musk are almost exclusively WHITE people.
Since 79 percent didn't vote for Trump, you go on ahead and vote for 2 out of the 10 who did. Blacks have decided stay out of this and let you white racists learn the lesson you need to learn. Because we protested with our vote to the tune of 86 percent voting for Harris. Whites had the problem. So whites have to protest the decision WHITES made.

1743545053350.webp

Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.” While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.

To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.


You should quit repeating racist propaganda, but you can't help yourself because that is what you are.
 
Last edited:
Since 79 percent didn't vote for Trump, you go on ahead and vote for 2 out of the 10 who did. Blacks have decided stay out of this and let you white racists learn the lesson you need to learn. Because we protested with our vote to the tune of 86 percent voting for Harris. Whites had the problem. So whites have to protest the decision WHITES made.

View attachment 1095842
Following the 2024 Election, media coverage has been dominated by newspapers seeking to articulate how Donald Trump won the election.1 As a part of this coverage, there is a noticeable rise in articles on the shift in Black and Latino votes for Trump with titles such as “Trump’s return to power fueled by Hispanic, working-class voter support,” and lines like “some surprising margins . . . within groups including women, Black and Latino voters helped carry the former president to victory.” While it is certainly important to recognize shifts in the voting patterns of people of color and what that means, the media framing that seeks to attribute Trump’s victory to people of color is concerning because it seemingly blames those who will be most devastated by a second Trump term for his victory.

To be clear, Trump’s voting coalition is overwhelmingly composed of white voters. Approximately 84% of the votes for Trump in 2024 were cast by white voters.


You should quit repeating racist propaganda, but you can't help yourself because that is what you are.

Right deporting the illegals who devastated BLACK communities and schools along with bringing back jobs is bad...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom