Trump, consistently, has not carried through on his threats to Iran.

[ElmerMudd]

Trump has not carried through on his threats to Iran.
He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.
He is losing credibility with his supporters except for the hardcore MAGA members

March 21, 2026 — 48-hour ultimatum​

Threat:

• Trump demanded Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours
• Warned the U.S. would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants

What happened:

• Deadline passed without compliance
• No immediate U.S. strike on power plants

What Trump did instead:

• Extended / shifted deadlines multiple times over the following days

Pattern: Hard deadline → no follow-through → timeline moved

---

Late March (around March 23–30) — escalating threats​

Threats:

• Expanded threats to include:
  • Oil wells
  • Electric grid
  • Kharg Island (major oil export hub)
• Suggested destruction if a deal wasn’t reached “shortly”

What happened:

• No comprehensive deal reached
• Iran did not meet full U.S. demands

Outcome:

• No full-scale destruction campaign launched
• Trump continued to alternate between:
  • claiming talks were progressing
  • threatening escalation

Pattern: Threat escalation → no execution → rhetorical shift

---

Early April (April 5–7, 2026) — “Power Plant Day / civilization” threats​

Threats:

• “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” (targeting infrastructure)
• “The entire country can be taken out in one night”
• “A whole civilization will die tonight”

Demand:

• Immediate deal and reopening of the Strait

---

April 7–8, 2026 — Iran responds / partial compliance environment​

What changed:

• Iran signaled willingness for:
  • ceasefire framework
  • talks via mediators (Pakistan, others)
• Movement toward reopening navigation conditions (core U.S. demand)

---

Result: Trump backs off imminent strike​

Instead of carrying out threats:

• Trump suspended planned attacks for two weeks
• Accepted negotiations instead of immediate escalation

This is the clearest example of:

• Explicit deadline + extreme threat
• Partial Iranian compliance / negotiation movement
• No follow-through on threatened destruction

---

Repeated deadline shifting (March → April 2026)​

Pattern documented:

• Deadlines moved from:
  • March 23 → later dates → early April → April 8
• Each time paired with warnings like:
  • “Hell will reign down”
  • Infrastructure destruction threats

Outcome:

• Deadlines repeatedly passed or were extended
• No immediate execution of the most extreme threats

---

April 2026 — Ceasefire despite unmet core demands​

Context:

• Iran did not fully concede on key issues (e.g., nuclear program, regional policy)

What Trump did:

• Entered a temporary ceasefire / pause in attacks
• Despite earlier threats of:
  • total destruction
  • immediate large-scale bombing

Key point: Even without full compliance, escalation was paused.

---

What this shows (pattern)​

Across multiple instances in 2026:

1. Ultimatums with fixed deadlines​

• “48 hours”
• “Tuesday night”
• “tonight”

2. Extreme threatened outcomes​

• Destroy infrastructure
• “obliterate” energy systems
• even “destroy the country”

3. Outcomes that diverged​

• Deadlines shifted or ignored
• Partial Iranian moves → diplomacy instead of strikes
• Ceasefire or pause instead of escalation

---

Bottom line​

There are clear, documented cases where:

• Trump issued specific, time-bound threats
• Iran partially engaged or moved toward demands (talks, ceasefire, navigation issues)
• Trump did not follow throughon the threatened large-scale attacks and instead:
  • delayed
  • escalated rhetoric further
  • or pivoted to negotiations

The April 7–8, 2026 episode (civilization / infrastructure threats → ceasefire) is the strongest concrete example of this pattern.

---

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.

True.

Trump Cult members of course believe the lie that this is part of Trump's 'master strategy.'

 

[1srelluc]

Meh.....Given the extent to which Iran's shit-has been pushed in I'd say he's doing OK.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Meh.....Given the extent to which Iran's shit-has been pushed in I'd say he's doing OK.

You and MAGA might but the world does not. His approval rating is the lowest it has ever been.

 

[Mac1958]

Unfortunately, the world now knows what he is. We're not the only ones.

The whole freakin' world knows what TACO is.

As a predictable result, America has lost all credibility. 80+ years of becoming the Leader of the Free World down the toilet.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Unfortunately, the world now knows what he is. We're not the only ones.

The whole freakin' world knows what TACO is.

As a predictable result, America has lost all credibility. 80+ years of becoming the Leader of the Free World down the toilet.

Biden sure helped our credibility, right?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

True.

Trump Cult members of course believe the lie that this is part of Trump's 'master strategy.'

It’s a phenomenon called TACO

 

[Hollie]

Trump has not carried through on his threats to Iran.
He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.
He is losing credibility with his supporters except for the hardcore MAGA members

March 21, 2026 — 48-hour ultimatum​

Threat:

• Trump demanded Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours
• Warned the U.S. would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants

What happened:

• Deadline passed without compliance
• No immediate U.S. strike on power plants

What Trump did instead:

• Extended / shifted deadlines multiple times over the following days

Pattern: Hard deadline → no follow-through → timeline moved

---

Late March (around March 23–30) — escalating threats​

Threats:

• Expanded threats to include:
  • Oil wells
  • Electric grid
  • Kharg Island (major oil export hub)
• Suggested destruction if a deal wasn’t reached “shortly”

What happened:

• No comprehensive deal reached
• Iran did not meet full U.S. demands

Outcome:

• No full-scale destruction campaign launched
• Trump continued to alternate between:
  • claiming talks were progressing
  • threatening escalation

Pattern: Threat escalation → no execution → rhetorical shift

---

Early April (April 5–7, 2026) — “Power Plant Day / civilization” threats​

Threats:

• “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” (targeting infrastructure)
• “The entire country can be taken out in one night”
• “A whole civilization will die tonight”

Demand:

• Immediate deal and reopening of the Strait

---

April 7–8, 2026 — Iran responds / partial compliance environment​

What changed:

• Iran signaled willingness for:
  • ceasefire framework
  • talks via mediators (Pakistan, others)
• Movement toward reopening navigation conditions (core U.S. demand)

---

Result: Trump backs off imminent strike​

Instead of carrying out threats:

• Trump suspended planned attacks for two weeks
• Accepted negotiations instead of immediate escalation

This is the clearest example of:

• Explicit deadline + extreme threat
• Partial Iranian compliance / negotiation movement
• No follow-through on threatened destruction

---

Repeated deadline shifting (March → April 2026)​

Pattern documented:

• Deadlines moved from:
  • March 23 → later dates → early April → April 8
• Each time paired with warnings like:
  • “Hell will reign down”
  • Infrastructure destruction threats

Outcome:

• Deadlines repeatedly passed or were extended
• No immediate execution of the most extreme threats

---

April 2026 — Ceasefire despite unmet core demands​

Context:

• Iran did not fully concede on key issues (e.g., nuclear program, regional policy)

What Trump did:

• Entered a temporary ceasefire / pause in attacks
• Despite earlier threats of:
  • total destruction
  • immediate large-scale bombing

Key point: Even without full compliance, escalation was paused.

---

What this shows (pattern)​

Across multiple instances in 2026:

1. Ultimatums with fixed deadlines​

• “48 hours”
• “Tuesday night”
• “tonight”

2. Extreme threatened outcomes​

• Destroy infrastructure
• “obliterate” energy systems
• even “destroy the country”

3. Outcomes that diverged​

• Deadlines shifted or ignored
• Partial Iranian moves → diplomacy instead of strikes
• Ceasefire or pause instead of escalation

---

Bottom line​

There are clear, documented cases where:

• Trump issued specific, time-bound threats
• Iran partially engaged or moved toward demands (talks, ceasefire, navigation issues)
• Trump did not follow throughon the threatened large-scale attacks and instead:
  • delayed
  • escalated rhetoric further
  • or pivoted to negotiations

The April 7–8, 2026 episode (civilization / infrastructure threats → ceasefire) is the strongest concrete example of this pattern.

---

Poor Elmer Fudd. He wants his forever war.

 

[luiza]

Trump has not carried through on his threats to Iran.
He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.
He is losing credibility with his supporters except for the hardcore MAGA members

March 21, 2026 — 48-hour ultimatum​

Threat:

• Trump demanded Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours
• Warned the U.S. would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants

What happened:

• Deadline passed without compliance
• No immediate U.S. strike on power plants

What Trump did instead:

• Extended / shifted deadlines multiple times over the following days

Pattern: Hard deadline → no follow-through → timeline moved

---

Late March (around March 23–30) — escalating threats​

Threats:

• Expanded threats to include:
  • Oil wells
  • Electric grid
  • Kharg Island (major oil export hub)
• Suggested destruction if a deal wasn’t reached “shortly”

What happened:

• No comprehensive deal reached
• Iran did not meet full U.S. demands

Outcome:

• No full-scale destruction campaign launched
• Trump continued to alternate between:
  • claiming talks were progressing
  • threatening escalation

Pattern: Threat escalation → no execution → rhetorical shift

---

Early April (April 5–7, 2026) — “Power Plant Day / civilization” threats​

Threats:

• “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” (targeting infrastructure)
• “The entire country can be taken out in one night”
• “A whole civilization will die tonight”

Demand:

• Immediate deal and reopening of the Strait

---

April 7–8, 2026 — Iran responds / partial compliance environment​

What changed:

• Iran signaled willingness for:
  • ceasefire framework
  • talks via mediators (Pakistan, others)
• Movement toward reopening navigation conditions (core U.S. demand)

---

Result: Trump backs off imminent strike​

Instead of carrying out threats:

• Trump suspended planned attacks for two weeks
• Accepted negotiations instead of immediate escalation

This is the clearest example of:

• Explicit deadline + extreme threat
• Partial Iranian compliance / negotiation movement
• No follow-through on threatened destruction

---

Repeated deadline shifting (March → April 2026)​

Pattern documented:

• Deadlines moved from:
  • March 23 → later dates → early April → April 8
• Each time paired with warnings like:
  • “Hell will reign down”
  • Infrastructure destruction threats

Outcome:

• Deadlines repeatedly passed or were extended
• No immediate execution of the most extreme threats

---

April 2026 — Ceasefire despite unmet core demands​

Context:

• Iran did not fully concede on key issues (e.g., nuclear program, regional policy)

What Trump did:

• Entered a temporary ceasefire / pause in attacks
• Despite earlier threats of:
  • total destruction
  • immediate large-scale bombing

Key point: Even without full compliance, escalation was paused.

---

What this shows (pattern)​

Across multiple instances in 2026:

1. Ultimatums with fixed deadlines​

• “48 hours”
• “Tuesday night”
• “tonight”

2. Extreme threatened outcomes​

• Destroy infrastructure
• “obliterate” energy systems
• even “destroy the country”

3. Outcomes that diverged​

• Deadlines shifted or ignored
• Partial Iranian moves → diplomacy instead of strikes
• Ceasefire or pause instead of escalation

---

Bottom line​

There are clear, documented cases where:

• Trump issued specific, time-bound threats
• Iran partially engaged or moved toward demands (talks, ceasefire, navigation issues)
• Trump did not follow throughon the threatened large-scale attacks and instead:
  • delayed
  • escalated rhetoric further
  • or pivoted to negotiations

The April 7–8, 2026 episode (civilization / infrastructure threats → ceasefire) is the strongest concrete example of this pattern.

---

His original brief was a six month minimum conflict to maximise Energy and Food shortages .
So it will be interesting to see how he achieves that , given that he seems to have used his full threats routine too early .

Or, has Deep State been obliged to changed the scale of the Psy Op?

 

[Hollie]

His original brief was a six month minimum conflict to maximise Energy and Food shortages .
So it will be interesting to see how he achieves that , given that he seems to have used his full threats routine too early .

Or, has Deep State been obliged to changed the scale of the Psy Op?

Not a very entertaining conspiracy theory, Louise.

 

[airplanemechanic]

You and MAGA might but the world does not. His approval rating is the lowest it has ever been.

And still 3 times more than the democrats 19%.

 

[1srelluc]

You and MAGA might but the world does not. His approval rating is the lowest it has ever been.

Meh, getting mostly what I voted for is good thing. Pissing your ilk off is a better thing.

 

[berg80]

Trump has not carried through on his threats to Iran.
He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.
He is losing credibility with his supporters except for the hardcore MAGA members

March 21, 2026 — 48-hour ultimatum​

Threat:

• Trump demanded Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours
• Warned the U.S. would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants

What happened:

• Deadline passed without compliance
• No immediate U.S. strike on power plants

What Trump did instead:

• Extended / shifted deadlines multiple times over the following days

Pattern: Hard deadline → no follow-through → timeline moved

---

Late March (around March 23–30) — escalating threats​

Threats:

• Expanded threats to include:
  • Oil wells
  • Electric grid
  • Kharg Island (major oil export hub)
• Suggested destruction if a deal wasn’t reached “shortly”

What happened:

• No comprehensive deal reached
• Iran did not meet full U.S. demands

Outcome:

• No full-scale destruction campaign launched
• Trump continued to alternate between:
  • claiming talks were progressing
  • threatening escalation

Pattern: Threat escalation → no execution → rhetorical shift

---

Early April (April 5–7, 2026) — “Power Plant Day / civilization” threats​

Threats:

• “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” (targeting infrastructure)
• “The entire country can be taken out in one night”
• “A whole civilization will die tonight”

Demand:

• Immediate deal and reopening of the Strait

---

April 7–8, 2026 — Iran responds / partial compliance environment​

What changed:

• Iran signaled willingness for:
  • ceasefire framework
  • talks via mediators (Pakistan, others)
• Movement toward reopening navigation conditions (core U.S. demand)

---

Result: Trump backs off imminent strike​

Instead of carrying out threats:

• Trump suspended planned attacks for two weeks
• Accepted negotiations instead of immediate escalation

This is the clearest example of:

• Explicit deadline + extreme threat
• Partial Iranian compliance / negotiation movement
• No follow-through on threatened destruction

---

Repeated deadline shifting (March → April 2026)​

Pattern documented:

• Deadlines moved from:
  • March 23 → later dates → early April → April 8
• Each time paired with warnings like:
  • “Hell will reign down”
  • Infrastructure destruction threats

Outcome:

• Deadlines repeatedly passed or were extended
• No immediate execution of the most extreme threats

---

April 2026 — Ceasefire despite unmet core demands​

Context:

• Iran did not fully concede on key issues (e.g., nuclear program, regional policy)

What Trump did:

• Entered a temporary ceasefire / pause in attacks
• Despite earlier threats of:
  • total destruction
  • immediate large-scale bombing

Key point: Even without full compliance, escalation was paused.

---

What this shows (pattern)​

Across multiple instances in 2026:

1. Ultimatums with fixed deadlines​

• “48 hours”
• “Tuesday night”
• “tonight”

2. Extreme threatened outcomes​

• Destroy infrastructure
• “obliterate” energy systems
• even “destroy the country”

3. Outcomes that diverged​

• Deadlines shifted or ignored
• Partial Iranian moves → diplomacy instead of strikes
• Ceasefire or pause instead of escalation

---

Bottom line​

There are clear, documented cases where:

• Trump issued specific, time-bound threats
• Iran partially engaged or moved toward demands (talks, ceasefire, navigation issues)
• Trump did not follow throughon the threatened large-scale attacks and instead:
  • delayed
  • escalated rhetoric further
  • or pivoted to negotiations

The April 7–8, 2026 episode (civilization / infrastructure threats → ceasefire) is the strongest concrete example of this pattern.

---

Fundamentally, as all bullies are, he's a coward.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Trump has not carried through on his threats to Iran.
He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.
He is losing credibility with his supporters except for the hardcore MAGA members

March 21, 2026 — 48-hour ultimatum​

Threat:

• Trump demanded Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours
• Warned the U.S. would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants

What happened:

• Deadline passed without compliance
• No immediate U.S. strike on power plants

What Trump did instead:

• Extended / shifted deadlines multiple times over the following days

Pattern: Hard deadline → no follow-through → timeline moved

---

Late March (around March 23–30) — escalating threats​

Threats:

• Expanded threats to include:
  • Oil wells
  • Electric grid
  • Kharg Island (major oil export hub)
• Suggested destruction if a deal wasn’t reached “shortly”

What happened:

• No comprehensive deal reached
• Iran did not meet full U.S. demands

Outcome:

• No full-scale destruction campaign launched
• Trump continued to alternate between:
  • claiming talks were progressing
  • threatening escalation

Pattern: Threat escalation → no execution → rhetorical shift

---

Early April (April 5–7, 2026) — “Power Plant Day / civilization” threats​

Threats:

• “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” (targeting infrastructure)
• “The entire country can be taken out in one night”
• “A whole civilization will die tonight”

Demand:

• Immediate deal and reopening of the Strait

---

April 7–8, 2026 — Iran responds / partial compliance environment​

What changed:

• Iran signaled willingness for:
  • ceasefire framework
  • talks via mediators (Pakistan, others)
• Movement toward reopening navigation conditions (core U.S. demand)

---

Result: Trump backs off imminent strike​

Instead of carrying out threats:

• Trump suspended planned attacks for two weeks
• Accepted negotiations instead of immediate escalation

This is the clearest example of:

• Explicit deadline + extreme threat
• Partial Iranian compliance / negotiation movement
• No follow-through on threatened destruction

---

Repeated deadline shifting (March → April 2026)​

Pattern documented:

• Deadlines moved from:
  • March 23 → later dates → early April → April 8
• Each time paired with warnings like:
  • “Hell will reign down”
  • Infrastructure destruction threats

Outcome:

• Deadlines repeatedly passed or were extended
• No immediate execution of the most extreme threats

---

April 2026 — Ceasefire despite unmet core demands​

Context:

• Iran did not fully concede on key issues (e.g., nuclear program, regional policy)

What Trump did:

• Entered a temporary ceasefire / pause in attacks
• Despite earlier threats of:
  • total destruction
  • immediate large-scale bombing

Key point: Even without full compliance, escalation was paused.

---

What this shows (pattern)​

Across multiple instances in 2026:

1. Ultimatums with fixed deadlines​

• “48 hours”
• “Tuesday night”
• “tonight”

2. Extreme threatened outcomes​

• Destroy infrastructure
• “obliterate” energy systems
• even “destroy the country”

3. Outcomes that diverged​

• Deadlines shifted or ignored
• Partial Iranian moves → diplomacy instead of strikes
• Ceasefire or pause instead of escalation

---

Bottom line​

There are clear, documented cases where:

• Trump issued specific, time-bound threats
• Iran partially engaged or moved toward demands (talks, ceasefire, navigation issues)
• Trump did not follow throughon the threatened large-scale attacks and instead:
  • delayed
  • escalated rhetoric further
  • or pivoted to negotiations

The April 7–8, 2026 episode (civilization / infrastructure threats → ceasefire) is the strongest concrete example of this pattern.

---

Trump: Either stop killing your people, stop threatening Israel and stop threatening US or we will kill your entire regime.

What Trump did: Killed their entire regime, eliminated their air force, their navy and 90% of their missile launchers. In 30 days. Their eye-uh-toll-uh was killed in the first seconds of the campaign. As well as 40 top commanders. IN ONE STRIKE.

Thank you Donald John Trump.

 

[berg80]

And still 3 times more than the democrats 19%.

Cuz...........the trump cult will never leave him.

 

[DGS49]

Well........he did obliterate their air force, their navy, their rocket and drone production capability, killed at least two layers of their total government and command structure. There's that stuff.

At present, he is TRYING to cause enough pain to the regime that they "surrender," without damaging the people and the overall country to such an extent that they cannot recover in a reasonable timeframe.

Were you not paying attention when he did the stuff in my first paragraph? Although the situation RIGHT NOW makes Trump look like a gullible fool, give it another week, many things will be sorted out.

If those fukkers refuse to come to the table over Israel's attacks on Hezbollah, I think Trump may be induced to take more definitive action.

 

[Nostra]

Trump has not carried through on his threats to Iran.
He has lost credibility worldwide. The US is loosing credibility worldwide.
He is losing credibility with his supporters except for the hardcore MAGA members

March 21, 2026 — 48-hour ultimatum​

Threat:

• Trump demanded Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours
• Warned the U.S. would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants

What happened:

• Deadline passed without compliance
• No immediate U.S. strike on power plants

What Trump did instead:

• Extended / shifted deadlines multiple times over the following days

Pattern: Hard deadline → no follow-through → timeline moved

---

Late March (around March 23–30) — escalating threats​

Threats:

• Expanded threats to include:
  • Oil wells
  • Electric grid
  • Kharg Island (major oil export hub)
• Suggested destruction if a deal wasn’t reached “shortly”

What happened:

• No comprehensive deal reached
• Iran did not meet full U.S. demands

Outcome:

• No full-scale destruction campaign launched
• Trump continued to alternate between:
  • claiming talks were progressing
  • threatening escalation

Pattern: Threat escalation → no execution → rhetorical shift

---

Early April (April 5–7, 2026) — “Power Plant Day / civilization” threats​

Threats:

• “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day” (targeting infrastructure)
• “The entire country can be taken out in one night”
• “A whole civilization will die tonight”

Demand:

• Immediate deal and reopening of the Strait

---

April 7–8, 2026 — Iran responds / partial compliance environment​

What changed:

• Iran signaled willingness for:
  • ceasefire framework
  • talks via mediators (Pakistan, others)
• Movement toward reopening navigation conditions (core U.S. demand)

---

Result: Trump backs off imminent strike​

Instead of carrying out threats:

• Trump suspended planned attacks for two weeks
• Accepted negotiations instead of immediate escalation

This is the clearest example of:

• Explicit deadline + extreme threat
• Partial Iranian compliance / negotiation movement
• No follow-through on threatened destruction

---

Repeated deadline shifting (March → April 2026)​

Pattern documented:

• Deadlines moved from:
  • March 23 → later dates → early April → April 8
• Each time paired with warnings like:
  • “Hell will reign down”
  • Infrastructure destruction threats

Outcome:

• Deadlines repeatedly passed or were extended
• No immediate execution of the most extreme threats

---

April 2026 — Ceasefire despite unmet core demands​

Context:

• Iran did not fully concede on key issues (e.g., nuclear program, regional policy)

What Trump did:

• Entered a temporary ceasefire / pause in attacks
• Despite earlier threats of:
  • total destruction
  • immediate large-scale bombing

Key point: Even without full compliance, escalation was paused.

---

What this shows (pattern)​

Across multiple instances in 2026:

1. Ultimatums with fixed deadlines​

• “48 hours”
• “Tuesday night”
• “tonight”

2. Extreme threatened outcomes​

• Destroy infrastructure
• “obliterate” energy systems
• even “destroy the country”

3. Outcomes that diverged​

• Deadlines shifted or ignored
• Partial Iranian moves → diplomacy instead of strikes
• Ceasefire or pause instead of escalation

---

Bottom line​

There are clear, documented cases where:

• Trump issued specific, time-bound threats
• Iran partially engaged or moved toward demands (talks, ceasefire, navigation issues)
• Trump did not follow throughon the threatened large-scale attacks and instead:
  • delayed
  • escalated rhetoric further
  • or pivoted to negotiations

The April 7–8, 2026 episode (civilization / infrastructure threats → ceasefire) is the strongest concrete example of this pattern.

---

So we didn't bomb them?


ALERT THE PRESS!





..

 

[berg80]

Well........he did obliterate their air force, their navy, their rocket and drone production capability, killed at least two layers of their total government and command structure.

Remember, you can't believe anything the regime says.

AI Overview

The Trump administration claims to have severely crippled Iran's ability to manufacture and launch drones through Operation Epic Fury, which began in late February 2026. While the administration asserts that drone manufacturing has been "decimated" and "shattered," independent intelligence and experts suggest significant capabilities remain intact due to Iran's extensive underground infrastructure.

 

[kyzr]

It’s a phenomenon called TACO

Actually its a phenomenon known as "we the US can wait", we don't need Hormuz oil, if and when other countries need Hormuz oil we can form a coalition and open Hormuz and do a regime change to end the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism.

 

[kyzr]

Remember, you can't believe anything the regime says.
AI Overview
The Trump administration claims to have severely crippled Iran's ability to manufacture and launch drones through Operation Epic Fury, which began in late February 2026. While the administration asserts that drone manufacturing has been "decimated" and "shattered," independent intelligence and experts suggest significant capabilities remain intact due to Iran's extensive underground infrastructure.

If Trump wants to destroy Iran's powerplants, that ends their drone production, missile production, and pretty much everything.