Trump buying positive headlines?

[Luddly Neddite]

Breitbart Staffers Believe Trump Has Given Money To Site For Favorable Coverage
Inside the most pro-Trump news outlet on the right, some employees say the billionaire candidate has provided financial backing in exchange for fawning headlines — a charge management strongly denies.

Obviously, this is exactly the sort of thing he would do but that doesn't mean he really did. Just as obvious is that Breitbart has been very dishonest in the past.

 

[DarkFury]

YOUR level of honesty here has also been shown to be lacking.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Breitbart Staffers Believe Trump Has Given Money To Site For Favorable Coverage
Inside the most pro-Trump news outlet on the right, some employees say the billionaire candidate has provided financial backing in exchange for fawning headlines — a charge management strongly denies.

Obviously, this is exactly the sort of thing he would do but that doesn't mean he really did. Just as obvious is that Breitbart has been very dishonest in the past.

what's the difference between that luddy and your socks here on USMB?

 

[Liminal]

Breitbart Staffers Believe Trump Has Given Money To Site For Favorable Coverage
Inside the most pro-Trump news outlet on the right, some employees say the billionaire candidate has provided financial backing in exchange for fawning headlines — a charge management strongly denies.

Obviously, this is exactly the sort of thing he would do but that doesn't mean he really did. Just as obvious is that Breitbart has been very dishonest in the past.

Funny to watch the right wing tear itself to pieces. 2016 should be a lock for the GOP, but the right wing will find a way to **** it up for them.....again.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

YOUR level of honesty here has also been shown to be lacking.

I didn't write the article and you're free to post proof that its wrong.

Breitbart Staffers Believe Trump Has Given Money To Site For Favorable Coverage
Inside the most pro-Trump news outlet on the right, some employees say the billionaire candidate has provided financial backing in exchange for fawning headlines — a charge management strongly denies.

Obviously, this is exactly the sort of thing he would do but that doesn't mean he really did. Just as obvious is that Breitbart has been very dishonest in the past.

what's the difference between that luddy and your socks here on USMB?

Do you understand that the United States of America is not an internet message board?

Who on USMess is running for prez of the US?

THAT's the difference.

And if you're saying I have socks, you're stupid. Find a new lie.

 

[Mad Scientist]

I "Believe" Hillary is buying favorable coverage as well. Feel free to post proof that i'm wrong.