The link the idiot above posted said Trump wanted to get Ghaddafi out, which he did. He specifically said a surgical strike. Hillary supported and led a byproxy war, arming the rebels, which backfired.
Now, can you spot the difference between those two positions? Or are you like Rye Gulper?
Sounds like the articles that say Trump supported the Libya engagement are true and he is once again lying and you have nothing to dispute the articles.
Sounds like you are as dumb as Rye Catcher and I have no obligation to try to make a chimp understand the two different positions. You made the claim the lied and couldn't back it up so don't put your shortcomings onto me.
I did not make the allegation that Trump lied. I mentioned that all the articles found when I googled called him a liar. The fact I used google as a source and pointed out all the articles on the topic referred to Trump lying about his position is backup. My follow-up comment was that you could not dispute the claims with your own link or source.
You are promoting and defending a position you are unable to substantiate. The view that opposes yours is substantiated. Trump supported military intervention in Libya and now is saying he did not, despite overwhelming evidence that he did. He is lying, again, like always.