trump Authorized soleimani Killing 7 Months Ago. With A Condition

[jc456]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

the guy breathing was the imminent threat. Trump disposed of it.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I am trying to understand how using drones to kill citizens of another country is acceptable, however using a drone to kill a war general is not acceptable.

We have the right to kill anyone that is actively working to carry out terrorist attacks on the US and its citizens.

Have you forgotten?

 

[miketx]

My God look at the media fed imbeciles!

 

[jc456]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

nobody cares about your terror love.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Obama gave the go ahead to kill Bin Laden...Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, Abu Nabil, ‘Jihadi John’ Mohammed Emwazi, another US citizen, Adam Gadahn and how can we forget Anwar Awlaki, yet another US citizen....

At least Trump didn't kill US citizens with his drone strikes.....I have no idea why no one will bring Obama up on murder charges tho...

 

[jc456]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

If there wasnt an imminent threat, why would they kill him? Just for fun?

why not huh? obammy did it.

 

[jc456]

Obama gave the go ahead to kill Bin Laden...Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, Abu Nabil, ‘Jihadi John’ Mohammed Emwazi, another US citizen, Adam Gadahn and how can we forget Anwar Awlaki, yet another US citizen....

At least Trump didn't kill US citizens with his drone strikes.....I have no idea why no one will bring Obama up on murder charges tho...

why, he was no imminent threat! he was in a cave in Pakistan.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

nobody cares about your terror love.

You obviously don't care about reading comprehension....

Because what you just typed shows me you have the reading comprehension of a discarded scrotum....

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Obama gave the go ahead to kill Bin Laden...Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, Abu Nabil, ‘Jihadi John’ Mohammed Emwazi, another US citizen, Adam Gadahn and how can we forget Anwar Awlaki, yet another US citizen....

At least Trump didn't kill US citizens with his drone strikes.....I have no idea why no one will bring Obama up on murder charges tho...

why, he was no imminent threat! he was in a cave in Pakistan.

Why didn't you save Bin Laden??

Some boyfriend you are....

 

[jc456]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

nobody cares about your terror love.

You obviously don't care about reading comprehension....

Because what you just typed shows me you have the reading comprehension of a discarded scrotum....

or not.

 

[TNHarley]

The article doesnt show he was lying. It shows he was aware of a known murderer. Said murderer could have been olanning something and that was it.
Truth is, none of us know the truth.

 

[jc456]

Obama gave the go ahead to kill Bin Laden...Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, Abu Nabil, ‘Jihadi John’ Mohammed Emwazi, another US citizen, Adam Gadahn and how can we forget Anwar Awlaki, yet another US citizen....

At least Trump didn't kill US citizens with his drone strikes.....I have no idea why no one will bring Obama up on murder charges tho...

why, he was no imminent threat! he was in a cave in Pakistan.

Why didn't you save Bin Laden??

Some boyfriend you are....

why would I? I wasn't there. Why wouldn't you? I mean, you got your terror love and all.

 

[Godboy]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

If there wasnt an imminent threat, why would they kill him? Just for fun?

"Because he was a bad guy who had been killing Americans for 20 years" is the standard justification.....

The fake imminent threat shit is just the way to do it without having to tell anyone....

I have a list of other bad guys he can kill if he wants to have some more fun....doubt he will tho, since he likes them.....

HE has a LONG list of bad guys he could kill. Why did he kill this guy in particular? For fun?

 

[jc456]

The article doesnt show he was lying. It shows he was aware of a known murderer. Said murderer could have been olanning something and that was it.
Truth is, none of us know the truth.

but we did sleep in a Holiday Inn Express.

 

[jc456]

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

If there wasnt an imminent threat, why would they kill him? Just for fun?

"Because he was a bad guy who had been killing Americans for 20 years" is the standard justification.....

The fake imminent threat shit is just the way to do it without having to tell anyone....

I have a list of other bad guys he can kill if he wants to have some more fun....doubt he will tho, since he likes them.....

HE has a LONG list of bad guys he could kill. Why did he kill this guy in particular? For fun?

you are arguing against this

 

[Spartacactcus]

He authorized killing Soleimani if there is an imminent threat of him blowing up embassies in the future.....

The intelligence agencies checked with him when they had knowledge of imminent attacks, and he gave the go ahead

This is really a pretty easy explanation.....

That's not what the article claimed was the red line. It said if Soleimani planned to " kill Americans " he could be taken out since as long ago as 7 months . Considering the presence of so many Americans in the near two decade war zone AKA Iraq it seems ridiculous that the bar was set so low for the assassination of the Iranian general.
The article also paints , imo , a very one sided account of US /Iranian relations since Trumps decision to scupper the nuclear deal and initiate crippling sanctions that are , if we are being honest here , acts of economic and diplomatic warfare designed at causing widespead suffering to the people of Iran.

The theme runs something like US economic and diplomatic warfare is portrayed as " pressure " whereas their reactions to it are aggression. We should be mindful that the Trump actions to attack Iran are ultimately responsible for everything cited in the article and stuff not cited like the deaths of those killed as a result of protests in Iran over months , the attacks in Iraq by both sides along with those of the plane downing with probably much more to follow

 

[jc456]

He authorized killing Soleimani if there is an imminent threat of him blowing up embassies in the future.....

The intelligence agencies checked with him when they had knowledge of imminent attacks, and he gave the go ahead

This is really a pretty easy explanation.....

That's not what the article claimed was the red line. It said if Soleimani planned to " kill Americans " he could be taken out since as long ago as 7 months . Considering the presence of so many Americans in the near two decade war zone AKA Iraq it seems ridiculous that the bar was set so low for the assassination of the Iranian general.
The article also paints , imo , a very one sided account of US /Iranian relations since Trumps decision to scupper the nuclear deal and initiate crippling sanctions that are , if we are being honest here , acts of economic and diplomatic warfare designed at causing widespead suffering to the people of Iran.

The theme runs something like US economic and diplomatic warfare is portrayed as " pressure " whereas their reactions to it are aggression. We should be mindful that the Trump actions to attack Iran are ultimately responsible for everything cited in the article and stuff not cited like the deaths of those killed as a result of protests in Iran over months , the attacks in Iraq by both sides along with those of the plane downing with probably much more to follow

the general attacked our embassy, our country, he declared war. that is the difference, especially when he killed one american.

 

[Penelope]

Wheres the dishonest part?

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

If there wasnt an imminent threat, why would they kill him? Just for fun?

why not huh? obammy did it.

And no one cares about the terrorist tramp killed either a couple months ago. Yet the General was like killing our Secretary of Defense.

 

[jc456]

The obvious lie about the imminent threat.

How does this article prove there wasnt an imminent threat?

It doesn't prove there was an imminent threat either...

We are simply at the mercy of our intelligence agencies...

When the intelligence agencies asserts shit you already want to believe, you hold them up as your evidence....

When the intelligence agencies assert shit you don't want to believe, you tear them down as the Deep State...

It's fun

If there wasnt an imminent threat, why would they kill him? Just for fun?

why not huh? obammy did it.

And no one cares about the terrorist tramp killed either a couple months ago. Yet the General was like killing our Secretary of Defense.

but a general. hmmmm sure, okay and so fking what? Did our Secretary of defense kill innocent contractors?

 

[Spartacactcus]

the general attacked our embassy, our country, he declared war. that is the difference, especially when he killed one american.

Iraqis supported by Iran attacked your embassy as the result of US airstikes that killed dozens of Iraqis with the preceding attack on the US base being a result of the incresing escalations since the US administration decided to target Iran

Your president decided to attack their entire country with a diplomatic war alongside an economic war and is trying to strangle the people into revolution with the deaths of hundreds/thousands? of Iranians , dozens of Iraqis and all the people on the plane as a result, along side one US military contractor working in a war zone.

Recognize where the deterioration actually started not where you want it to start