Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 58,434
- 43,493
- 3,615
This is why we love the guy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heck, Obama did as well.First, I want to thank General Mattis for his service. But what he said about Trump was wrong.
If you want to point the blame on any division, that blame should directly go straight to Obama himself.
Trump had every right to insert the National Guard during the riotings in Washington DC.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. ... §§ 331–335) that empowers the president of the United States to deploy military troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion.
So it was OK to use troops to protect blacks trying to enter school in the 1960's, but not OK to use troops to protect people from communist terrorism, arson and looting?First, I want to thank General Mattis for his service. But what he said about Trump was wrong.
If you want to point the blame on any division, that blame should directly go straight to Obama himself.
Trump had every right to insert the National Guard during the riotings in Washington DC.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. ... §§ 331–335) that empowers the president of the United States to deploy military troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion.
So it was OK to use troops to protect blacks trying to enter school in the 1960's, but not OK to use troops to protect people from communist terrorism, arson and looting?
I was just kinda asking the whole world, but I used a post from you to inject the question.Well, to be honest...I wasn't around in the 1960's. I was born in 1971. So, I cannot answer that, since I wasn't around during that time.
I am not going to answer your valid question with any lies.
Now, if you are asking me in a hypothetical sense, I can only say that, it wouldn't be okay. If the troops are protecting blacks trying to enter school in 2020, and at the same time, protect people from communist terrorism, arson and looting - we have a serious problem.
My statement was the fact, President Trump has the authority to use the National Guard if those blue states would not stop the senseless riotings. People are getting confused with people who are protesting peacefully and those who are just rioting and looting. Especially in DC, where he said he would activate the Guards. That is why I posted the law the President has that power to activate if he chooses to do so.
Heck, Obama did as well.
And National Guard were ordered in due to the Michael Brown protests.Obama orders 1,200 Guard troops to border
President Barack Obama ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to boost security along the U.S.-Mexico border, pre-empting Republican plans to try to force votes on such a deployment.www.nbcnews.com
Yeah, but that's completely different. The messiah was in good standing with his sheep and the msm.Heck, Obama did as well.First, I want to thank General Mattis for his service. But what he said about Trump was wrong.
If you want to point the blame on any division, that blame should directly go straight to Obama himself.
Trump had every right to insert the National Guard during the riotings in Washington DC.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. ... §§ 331–335) that empowers the president of the United States to deploy military troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion.