Trump Admin will be setting fire to enough food to feed 1.5 million children for a week

[Correll]

Yep. And none of them can back up this supposed concern with anything real.

The 'net's lousy with virtue signaling limo libs cloaked in 'save the children' guise Correll

~S~

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Theft is defined under the law. Taxation simply doesn't qualify as such. I don't know why people won't accept that.

anyone who thinks taxation is theft is a poopy head.

and wrong as well.

Such people do not understand our Constitution.

 

[Stryder50]

Why?

Like most "conservatives", you mistake opposition to Zionism as anti-Semitism.

And then you wonder why 75% of Jews still end up voting for Democrats.

A key component of Abram/Abraham's* Pact with YHWH was for he and his "clan", the Hebrews, to occupy a small piece of land in the Levant where YHWH wanted them to reside. Zionism, return to and reoccupy the land assigned to them by YHWH, is the fundamental foundation and essence of the Jewish Religion and of their ethnic.

Hence opposition to Zionism is also "anti-Semitism(anti-Jews)".
You "liberals" have difficulty understanding words and concepts correctly. For example, Hebrews/Jews are just one of several ethnics from the same region who are considered Semites anthropologically. Similar to how you are confused and fail to distinguish between Natural Climate Change versus Human(Anthropogenic) Climate Change.

* He was known as Abram until after his pact with YHWH when he became Abraham.

I don't "wonder why 75% of (American) Jews still end up voting for Democrats" any more than wondering why some supposedly intelligent and educated persons vote Democrat. A combination of selective ignorance and disbelief often causes people to act in ways that are against their own best interests.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

This is simply real life after all the jaw jacking above is done.

The Jews stay, and Arabdom goes cray cray.

 

[Stryder50]

Theft is defined under the law. Taxation simply doesn't qualify as such. I don't know why people won't accept that.

You failed to grasp the context of the post you responded to.
Compelled generosity is not voluntary charity, it is forced redistribution of personal wealth/property.
Failure to pays taxes may result in fines, imprisonment, and/or confiscation of one's property and assets.
Taxation is legal theft by the State, versus illegal theft by individuals from other individuals.

"feed or clothe the world", i.e. give tax revenues to other nations/peoples outside of the USA is not a Constitutional duty of the Federal government.

 

[Stryder50]

This is simply real life after all the jaw jacking above is done.

The Jews stay, and Arabdom goes cray cray.

It's not about "Arabdom", it's about Islam.
While Islam started as a religion for the Arabs, not all Arabs are Muslim. Also, Arabs didn't occupy or claim the Levant until many became Muslims and conquered that land.

 

[Stryder50]

anyone who thinks taxation is theft is a poopy head.

and wrong as well.

Such people do not understand our Constitution.

The issue was about taxation to provide to people outside of the USA. Our constitution doesn't list that as a right or obligation of the Federal government.

Seems you may be one of the "people do not understand our Constitution."

 

[whitehall]

"1.5 million children where? It's estimated that about a million unaccounted children admitted to the U.S. under the Biden administration are being used as sex slaves. Who do we see about that?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It's not about "Arabdom", it's about Islam.
While Islam started as a religion for the Arabs, not all Arabs are Muslim. Also, Arabs didn't occupy or claim the Levant until many became Muslims and conquered that land.

Does not matter. The Jews do Jews, and you all will accept it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The issue was about taxation to provide to people outside of the USA. Our constitution doesn't list that as a right or obligation of the Federal government.

Seems you may be one of the "people do not understand our Constitution."

Stryder, you are no constitutionalist. You have to abide SCOTUS. No other end of story.

 

[Stryder50]

Does not matter. The Jews do Jews, and you all will accept it.

No reply emoji for "you are confused - incoherent ", Fake News is closest.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Stryder50, anti-Joo has no power.

 

[Stryder50]

Stryder, you are no constitutionalist. You have to abide SCOTUS. No other end of story.

Slow ponies,

The Constitution is a Citizens Owner's Manual for our government. By time one graduates high school they should be competent in reading and comprehension to understand most of it.

SCOTUS has often been wrong and reversed prior decisions.

It's an on going story, with a few different interpretations it seems.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Slow ponies,

The Constitution is a Citizens Owner's Manual for our government. By time one graduates high school they should be competent in reading and comprehension to understand most of it.

SCOTUS has often been wrong and reversed prior decisions.

It's an on going story, with a few different interpretations it seems.

Then you know it is SCOTUS that corrects itself, not Trump.

 

[Midnight FM]

I have the distinct impression you aren't well-versed on the subject.

The word you're looking for is "taxonomics," or "taxonomy."

And yes, it does define what a living being is. I wonder why that's unacceptable to you?

It's pretty simple. Taxation isn't theft. Theft is the illegal taking of property. Taxation is protected under the US Constitution, just as people's property rights are defined under the law.

It's similar to how killing in war is not "murder". Murder is the illegal killing of a person.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's already been addressed and proven wrong

 

[TemplarKormac]

It's pretty simple. Taxation isn't theft. Theft is the illegal taking of property. Taxation is protected under the US Constitution, just as people's property rights are defined under the law.

It's similar to how killing in war is not "murder". Murder is the illegal killing of a person.

Hold on, I thought I was commenting in your abortion related thread, let's back up and delete our responses and try again. My apologies.

 

[Midnight FM]

It's already been addressed and proven wrong

Nope, taxation is protected under the US Constitution. It isn't theft. Illegally taking someone's property under the law is the definition of theft.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Theft is defined under the law. Taxation simply doesn't qualify as such. I don't know why people won't accept that.

I'm sorry, but it does qualify as theft. The government is not a beneficiary of my hard work; it isn't entitled to what I earn and sweat for. It demands a portion of my earnings or what I work for in order to function, which is nothing more than a hostile parasitic relationship. But here we are.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I'm sorry, but it does qualify as theft. The government is not a beneficiary of my hard work; it isn't entitled to what I earn and sweat for. It demands a portion of my earnings or what I work for in order to function, which is nothing more than a hostile parasitic relationship. But here we are.

That you are wrong technically and morally is your problem.