Trump Accomplishments 2025

[TemplarKormac]

Overall Immigration Detentions by ICE (2025)
Total detentions/arrests (all nationalities)

• Between January 20 and late June 2025, ICE conducted ~109,000 arrests nationwide. Most of those detained were migrants from Latin America and the Caribbean. El País
• Another data compilation shows over 273,000 total arrests by the agency in the first 7 months of 2025. La República

Current detainee population

• As of mid-December 2025, ICE was holding over 68,400 people in detention, the highest level on record. Reddit
• Earlier in the year, estimates showed ~56,000 detainees at once in ICE custody. Reddit

People with no criminal record
These figures are important because being detained without criminal history is often cited in discussions of “harassment.”

• One dataset shows roughly 71.7% of ICE detainees had no criminal conviction. VisaVerge
• Another analysis found that

Overall Immigration Detentions by ICE (2025)
Total detentions/arrests (all nationalities)

• Between January 20 and late June 2025, ICE conducted ~109,000 arrests nationwide. Most of those detained were migrants from Latin America and the Caribbean. El País
• Another data compilation shows over 273,000 total arrests by the agency in the first 7 months of 2025. La República

Current detainee population

• As of mid-December 2025, ICE was holding over 68,400 people in detention, the highest level on record. Reddit
• Earlier in the year, estimates showed ~56,000 detainees at once in ICE custody. Reddit

People with no criminal record
These figures are important because being detained without criminal history is often cited in discussions of “harassment.”

• One dataset shows roughly 71.7% of ICE detainees had no criminal conviction. VisaVerge
• Another analysis found that in many street arrests, about 90% of those picked up were immigrants from Latin America with no convictions or removal orders.

See, here's the thing: if they are all proven to be here illegally, they, by entering illegally, have already incurred a criminal record. So, to say they had "no criminal record" is not accurate and a deliberate ignorance of the facts. The very first criminal law you are proven to have broken here makes you a criminal. Common sense.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I'll give rightwinger some credit here, he is giving links when asked. That's not taking into account the bias or veracity of said links, however.

Good on you.

 

[JGalt]

So why is everything better now that Biden is gone

And Harris too. No more incessant cackling and unintelligible word salads.

 

[JGalt]

Record low border crossings and a dramatic decrease in crime across the country.

 

[IM2]

Biden and Kamala were disasters for toxic democrats, and toxic democrats are disasters for the US.

You democrats have nothing to run on in 2026 or 2028, except their record of disasters.

Trump has been a disaster. Teice. Biden actually did a good job. Putting Trump back in office was a huge mistake. That is what history will eventually record.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Pardoned Jan 6 rioters including those who assaulted police

Jack Smith says key Jan 6 witness relied on hearsay, lacked firsthand evidence

Jack Smith told Congress that witnesses gave "different perspectives" than Cassidy Hutchinson regarding President Donald Trump's Jan. 6 actions.

www.foxnews.com

 

[IM2]

See, here's the thing: if they are all proven to be here illegally, they, by entering illegally, have already incurred a criminal record. So, to say they had "no criminal record" is not accurate and a deliberate ignorance of the facts. The very first law you are proven to have broken here makes you a criminal. Common sense.

In reality, those are civil crimes, not criminal. By your own words, you elected a criminal to be our president, and you support and defend a criminal administration and its criminal policies. You are enabling criminality.

 

[IM2]

Jack Smith says key Jan 6 witness relied on hearsay, lacked firsthand evidence

Jack Smith told Congress that witnesses gave "different perspectives" than Cassidy Hutchinson regarding President Donald Trump's Jan. 6 actions.

www.foxnews.com

Fox paid over 700 million for lying. They have zero credibility.

 

[rightwinger]

I'll give rightwinger some credit here, he is giving links when asked. That's not taking into account the bias or veracity of said links, however.

Good on you.

You are welcome to refute any of the bipartisan legislation I cited

But since you can’t I guess denial works

 

[Meathead]

Trump has been a disaster. Teice. Biden actually did a good job. Putting Trump back in office was a huge mistake. That is what history will eventually record.

Ebonics?

 

[rightwinger]

Jack Smith says key Jan 6 witness relied on hearsay, lacked firsthand evidence

Jack Smith told Congress that witnesses gave "different perspectives" than Cassidy Hutchinson regarding President Donald Trump's Jan. 6 actions.

www.foxnews.com

That is your excuse for Trump pardoning rioters who were convicted of storming the Capitol and beating police who tried to stop them?

That is acceptable to you because it was done for your political opinion?

 

[TemplarKormac]

In reality, those are civil crimes, not criminal.

Nah.

"8 U.S.C. § 1325 - Improper Entry by Alien" is a federal offense. A misdemeanor criminal offense under current legal jurisprudence.

 

[TemplarKormac]

By your own words, you elected a criminal to be our president, and you support and defend a criminal administration and its criminal policies.

Here's another thing: trying his case in a heavily left state does not speak well for the Justice system there. Any junior lawyer will tell you the jury will be weighted against the defendant given their political affiliations and the pool they were drawn from. The verdict and those charges hold very little weight with me. No impartiality existed when he was charged.

If he's nailed something truly, mind-bendingly earth-shattering, please let me know.

 

[Meathead]

That is your excuse for Trump pardoning rioters who were convicted of storming the Capitol and beating police who tried to stop them?

That is acceptable to you because it was done for your political opinion?

So, what's your excuse for Biden pardoning his immediate family? Hunter and his brother?

 

[IM2]

c

Nah.

"8 U.S.C. § 1325 - Improper Entry by Alien" is a federal offense. A misdemeanor criminal offense under current legal jurisprudence.

View attachment 1199913

Funny how actual lawyers have said it was a civil offense. But the problem you have is that we have a convicted criminal president whom you excuse and support. So you truly have no room to be talking. So if you are really for punishing ciminals start with demanding Trump's resignation. If you can't do that, you are only supporting thee eportatins becuse you are a racist.

 

[rightwinger]

Here's another thing: trying his case in a heavily left state does not speak well for the Justice system there. Any junior lawyer will tell you the jury will be weighted against the defendant given their political affiliations and the pool they were drawn from. The verdict and those charges hold very little weight with me. No impartiality existed when he was charged.

If he's nailed something truly, mind-bendingly earth-shattering, please let me know.

Trump was tried by a jury of his peers
That means he is tried in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime was committed
He needed to convince ONE juror he was innocent

He failed

 

[struth]

In reality, those are civil crimes, not criminal. By your own words, you elected a criminal to be our president, and you support and defend a criminal administration and its criminal policies. You are enabling criminality.

8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien

www.law.cornell.edu

No it’s a crime punishable by 6 months in federal prison

 

[IM2]

Here's another thing: trying his case in a heavily left state does not speak well for the Justice system there. Any junior lawyer will tell you the jury will be weighted against the defendant given their political affiliations and the pool they were drawn from. The verdict and those charges hold very little weight with me. No impartiality existed when he was charged.

If he's nailed something truly, mind-bendingly earth-shattering, please let me know.

More excuses. What doesn't hold weight with you doesn't mean ----. He was indicted. Then he was found guilty by citizens of this country picked by his lawyers to sit on a jury. So you can just stop denying that you support crime. Again, if you are really for punishing crime, demand that Trump resign. 91 indictments shows anyone who is not a deranged Trump-worshipping cultist that the man is a criminal. You MAGATS are still talking about Obama and Biden being guilty of crimes without ne inictment am EVERY investigation on them has turned up nothing. But this guy, he's always innocent. So I figure just as long as sells you white supremacy, you will suck his dick.

 

[IM2]

Trump was tried by a jury of his peers
That means he is tried in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime was committed
He needed to convince ONE juror he was innocent

He failed

The moron doesn't consider that his lawyer helped pick the jury.

 

[struth]

More excuses. What doesn't hold weight with you doesn't mean ----. He was indicted. Then he was found guilty by citizens of this country picked by his lawyers to sit on a jury. So you can just stop denying that you support crime. Again, if you are really for punishing crime, demand that Trump resign. 91 indictments shows anyone who is not a deranged Trump-worshipping cultist that the man is a criminal. You MAGATS are still talking about Obama and Biden being guilty of crimes without ne inictment am EVERY investigation on them has turned up nothing. But this guy, he's always innocent. So I figure just as long as sells you white supremacy, you will suck his dick.

Where did you get the idea that defense attorneys pick who’s on a jury?