Here are some members of the military working in Qatar.
I can't tell if any of them are transsexual, but I can't see how there being so if they are makes any difference. There are surely myriad rear echelon war-zone roles in which military officers and enlisted personnel serve. I doubt our military is so thinly staffed that we have to have people running from places like the facility above to the battle lines and back again, although there are likely people whose military job does entail essentially that. Moreover, if we are shorthanded, we need every able person who's willing to pick up a gun and shoot at the enemy.
So either we're "beggars" who have no business being so choosy, or we're not, in which case Trump's making "political hay" at the expense of
a very small population of Americans (see also:
Transgender Population Size in the United States: a Meta-Regression of Population-Based Probability Samples) who, by and large, are not well understood or liked by Trump's myopic base of supporters. Which is it?
Mattis under the new policy is expected to consider “deployability”—the ability to serve in a war zone, participate in exercises or live for months on a ship—as the primary legal means to decide whether to separate service members from the military, the officials said…
- Does seawater have a unique affect on transsexuals?