Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
I only have that clip. I certainly hope Dr. Phil gave her hell, and that she lost her medical license.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I only have that clip. I certainly hope Dr. Phil gave her hell, and that she lost her medical license.
For not accepting a transperson. That so-called "Doctor" lady had the nerve to ridicule and humiliate a blind person and then say "we took an oath to help people."Gave her hell for what?...
She purposely blinded his or herself... but I never heard the doctor say anything about gender... did you?...For not accepting a transperson. That so-called "Doctor" lady had the nerve to ridicule and humiliate a blind person and then say "we took an oath to help people."
Yeah.
Really freakin' helpful.
That poor woman is a blind person. There can be no doubt of that. The fact that she was assigned "seeing" at birth doesn't change the fact that she is a real blind person. I wonder if that doctor thinks that Jule should be excluded from the Paralympic games as "not a real blind person."
Well, no.She purposely blinded his or herself... but I never heard the doctor say anything about gender... did you?...
transabled??? LMAO... what the hell is that?...Well, no.
The show was about a transabled person, not a transgendered person.
Yes, she purposefully blinded herself, just as transgendered people often castrate themselves, or voluntarily are castrated.
If she was idiotic enough to purposely destroy her vision, how is is "transabled?" She's blind .. and not "identifying" as a blind person. Much different than a man who castrates himself, hollows out his cock and pushes it in to mimic a vagina. He's still a man.Well, no.
The show was about a transabled person, not a transgendered person.
Yes, she purposefully blinded herself, just as transgendered people often purposely castrate themselves, or voluntarily are castrated.
Sorry, I'm not going to start from scratch because you are uninformed. Here's a link:transabled??? LMAO... what the hell is that?...
If that is true, then all the more reason that the Doctor should not be denying her reality.If she was idiotic enough to purposely destroy her vision, how is is "transabled?" She's blind .. and not "identifying" as a blind person. Much different than a man who castrates himself, hollows out his cock and pushes it in to mimic a vagina. He's still a man.
You should.Do you get more benefits from the diversity and inclusion police if a man identifies as a blind, black lesbian female?
It's a shame that feeling like something .. doesn't make it a reality; however, physically blinding yourself, does.You should.
How many blind, black lesbian females do you think are CEO's of Fortune 500 Companies? As many as cis white males of non-Hispanic origin CEO's?
Probably close to zero. Even closer to zero if you look at blind, black lesbian, females who are transabled, transgender, transracial, and transattraction.
transabled??? LMAO... what the hell is that?...
A simple definition would surmise... I'm not asking for the history of it... all I want to know is what the **** it is.....Sorry, I'm not going to start from scratch because you are uninformed. Here's a link:
transabled - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
en.wiktionary.org
If that is true, then all the more reason that the Doctor should not be denying her reality.
You should.
How many blind, black lesbian females do you think are CEO's of Fortune 500 Companies? As many as cis white males of non-Hispanic origin CEO's?
Probably close to zero. Even closer to zero if you look at blind, black lesbian, females who are transabled, transgender, transracial, and transattraction.
I don't know what "we" are saying that. The 1st has no exception for "but that's insane!" so any one has the right to say what they please. I'm only pointing out the hypocricy of a doctor using her right to free speech to attack a trans person and then say "we doctors are supposed to help people."So are we saying that only people with a trans in front of their category have a right to say what they please regardless how insane it is and nobody else has the same right.
So, if a person perceives themself as a blind, black lesbian female, and you perceive them as a seeing white male heterosexual, you have some objective way of proving that your perception is the reality?It's a shame that feeling like something .. doesn't make it a reality; however, physically blinding yourself, does.
Then you are welcome for the link I provided! FWIW, it seems that a post-op transgender fits this part of the definition:A simple definition would surmise... I'm not asking for the history of it... all I want to know is what the **** it is.....
I only have that clip. I certainly hope Dr. Phil gave her hell, and that she lost her medical license.
That wasn't an attack. That doctor...rare as she is, is speaking the truth. WE are all watching the insanity of what is happennig to this country. The entire nation...<half of it has lost their minds.I don't know what "we" are saying that. The 1st has no exception for "but that's insane!" so any one has the right to say what they please. I'm only pointing out the hypocricy of a doctor using her right to free speech to attack a trans person and then say "we doctors are supposed to help people."
So, if a person perceives themself as a blind, black lesbian female, and you perceive them as a seeing white male heterosexual, you have some objective way of proving that your perception is the reality?
Then you are welcome for the link I provided! FWIW, it seems that a post-op transgender fits this part of the definition:
But "Doctor Phil" would never have a medical doctor on the show to excoriate a post-op transgender, or if one did Phil would call them on it.
- Of a person with body integrity identity disorder: having had an amputation or other surgery performed to remove or alter the healthy organ or part.
Perception doesn't change the reality that the individual is still their birth identity. Doesn't matter how anyone perceives it ... a man is still a man and a woman is still a woman.So, if a person perceives themself as a blind, black lesbian female, and you perceive them as a seeing white male heterosexual, you have some objective way of proving that your perception is the reality?