Trans success story. Women shut out of cycling event

[HikerGuy83]

Dumbass arguments that are opposed to scientific realities.

I am sure you have some examples. Let's see them.

The scientific method has it's name for a reason.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Values such as men pretending to be women because those men can’t compete against other men?

Values in such as respecting what was established and now crashing it with a whole new set of conditions.

The morons on this board can't seem to understand that.

 

[Rawley]

There are values more important than winning a bike race. Americans must come together to start working to find a solution to these differences.

There is no "solution" to the physical difference between a man and a woman.

 

[Curried Goats]

Go ahead and talk science. Let's see what you've got.

Donald already showed that biology is more complex than just males and females. We have intersexed people who have mixed sexual biology and trans people who have mixed gender identities.

 

[Hollie]

Is that one where women were made from the rib of a man?

Is that one where you wearing lipstick, eyeshadow and high heels makes you a woman?

 

[Curried Goats]

Is that one where you wearing lipstick and eyeshadow and high heels makes you a woman?

Is that your argument? It certainly isn't mine. Do you have anything other than a strawman for an argument Dumbass?

 

[Hollie]

Is that your argument? It certainly isn't mine. Do you have anything other than a strawman for an argument Dumbass?

Your argument consists of name-calling. Your silly tirades are laughable.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Your argument consists of name-calling. Your silly tirades are laughable.

He squawks science but doesn't understand science

 

[Curried Goats]

Your argument consists of name-calling. Your silly tirades are laughable.

Nope. They consist of relaying science to you and then laughing because all of you sad ***** are too ***** to rock with your Bibles. Jesus isn't good enough for you that you want to claim science?

 

[Hollie]

Nope. They consist of relaying science to you and then laughing because all of you sad ***** are too ***** to rock with your Bibles. Jesus isn't good enough for you that you want to claim science?

You are relaying only your own fears and ignorance. If you enjoy playing dress up in women’s clothes, you have a sexual disorder. Seek help.

 

[HikerGuy83]

We have intersexed people who have mixed sexual biology and trans people who have mixed gender identities.

Interesexed can describe a lot of people.

Some might have a case for competing against women, but not all.

That's pretty straightforwad. That trangender men come in and dominate in a womans competition is pretty compelling "Scientific" data.

 

[Donald H]

Donald already showed that biology is more complex than just males and females. We have intersexed people who have mixed sexual biology and trans people who have mixed gender identities.

The dividing line on opinions is not a line that exclusively divides liberals and conservatives. That's the foot in the door that can lead to change and acceptance.

It's not so different from wearing a fkng seatbelt or accepting air bags or emissions control.

 

[Curried Goats]

You are relaying only your own fears and ignorance. If you enjoy playing dress up in women’s clothes, you have a sexual disorder. Seek help.

See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Donald already showed that biology is more complex than just males and females.

That has always been the case. It calls it a continum. But that would imply some kind of weighting.

In what has been a binary situation, you have then, muliple classificcations under one name.

Maybe they need to spread out.

Why can't you have a trangender mens's class.

Your own article demonstates why it is stupid to simply let billogical men compete in mens sports.

 

[Donald H]

See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.

I refuse to do the emoticons, but thank you in person!

 

[Hollie]

The dividing line on opinions is not a line that exclusively divides liberals and conservatives. That's the foot in the door that can lead to change and acceptance.

It's not so different from wearing a fkng seatbelt or accepting air bags or emissions control.

Wearing a seatbelt or accepting airbags or emission controls is analogous to men in women’s sports.

What a pointless attempt at comparison.

 

[HikerGuy83]

See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.

All he did was blur the lines. It, in no way justifies the current approach. And the results would imply the current approacch is incorrect.

 

[Curried Goats]

Interesexed can describe a lot of people.

It certainly can. Is that all you got on that?

Some might have a case for competing against women, but not all.

A case to who? It's private organization that doesn't give a **** how you feel. See all the other women on the podium? All were in celebration.

That's pretty straightforwad. That trangender men come in and dominate in a womans competition is pretty compelling "Scientific" data.

Except it ain't though. One race isn't data you Clown. Go find some that supports you and come back.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The dividing line on opinions is not a line that exclusively divides liberals and conservatives. That's the foot in the door that can lead to change and acceptance.

Your own article says there is no dividing line. What is needed is not change an acceptance of men in womens sports. What is needed is a place for trangender men in transgener mens sports. I realize that (for some reason) offends your sensibilities, but your article makes it plain that this is a better route.

 

[Hollie]

See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.

See. Your attempt at argument is nothing more than bad analogies and something you heard about “intersex”, which you have an odd fascination with but no knowledge of.