What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Too big to fail

LilOlLady

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
9,137
Reaction score
949
Points
190
Location
Reno, NV
TOO BIG TO FAIL

Those banks that were failed out were too big to fail and they have paid back the money used to bail them out. If they had been allowed to fail, we would have failed also. They are lowering mortgage and mortgage payment, giving loans to first home buyers and to by other things such as cars and the auto industry was too big to fail also. Small banks and loan companies were not able to give those loans, because they’re not big enough. Allowing big banks to fail is just like letting Medicare and Social Security fail.

By the way, Medicare and Social Security, unemployment insurance are mandatory programs so why don’t village idiots have them repealed? If you work, you have to pay into these programs and other programs as well. You are force to pay into them even if you never use them.
Village idiots are a bunch of idiots along with right wing nuts.
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
71,637
Reaction score
38,408
Points
2,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
Fail_forecast.jpg
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
14,201
Reaction score
3,563
Points
185
Which Banks?

Gd is in the details.

The bank I worked at was coerced into taking the money. My understanding was they didn't want it.

the only bank that needed it was Bank of America, as they were lied to when they took over Merrill. Did a favor for the fed and it nearly sank them.

Wachovia was the next closest thing, but they were bought out without TARP. They were a good match for Wells, and they have been talking merger for years. Wells got stuck with TARP money, but it wasn't part of the Wachovia deal.

Now if Citi had done the Wachovia deal, that would have resulted in a bank surviving only on government loans. The Fed and the treasury were annoyed that Wachovia got away. The stockholders breathed a sigh of relief. Citi wanted to get Wachovia for 70 cents a share, which would have been paid for out of the treasury. Wells paid $7.

Citi darn near came down. But they are doing a lot better now.
 

amrchaos

Pentheus torn apart
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
9,498
Reaction score
933
Points
215
Location
Miami
I know I did not follow the previous post correctly

I thought Wachovia failed--translation:they needed the money!!


Anyway, the best idea was to break companies up when they become too large--like in "Too big to fail"
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top