- Thread starter
- #221
To those who say "I'd vote for anyone but Trump"
- Thread starter Robert W
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #222
So experts on this are incorrect?
- Thread starter
- #223
Here is your primary problem, you do not understand correct debates. Why for example did you load up your statements with tons of statements? Did you believe anything. When you warble so much any skilled debater can have you for dinner every time.
Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 29,730
- 11,241
- 465
Imagine using YouTube as a response to a debate question. Ironic. I bet you don't even understand the term. Formal debate doesn't factor in your hurt feelz. You can either do it, or you can't.
You couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag with a chainsaw.
- Thread starter
- #225
You merely made claims.
- Thread starter
- #226
Very very poor debate skills on your part. Pros in Debate annoy you so you try this stunt.Imagine using YouTube as a response to a debate question. Ironic. I bet you don't even understand the term. Formal debate doesn't factor in your hurt feelz. You can either do it, or you can't.
You couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag with a chainsaw.
Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 29,730
- 11,241
- 465
Wrong again. Debates aren't 'correct'. They don't care about your judgement or opinion. They are formal and informal.
WAT.
I'm speaking clearly. Maybe you have a reading comprehension issue. 
Therein lies the rub. I haven't seen any magaturds that are skilled debators.
So, bring it.
- Thread starter
- #228
That is why I introduced you to a debate expert and you did not like that.
- Thread starter
- #229
Sure, you make claims about Trump. Pick your best and we will engage in correct debate, on my side anyway.Wrong again. Debates aren't 'correct'. They don't care about your judgement or opinion. They are formal and informal.
WAT.
Therein lies the rub. I haven't seen any magaturds that are skilled debators.
Tip, smearing parties is poor debate. What is a magaturd?
The republicans claimed trump as their own in 2015. That's the whole problem. When you hire a criminal to do your work you're hands are just as dirty. It's been nothing but unending wasted time , money and effort trying to defend him and it's never worked. Latest approval rating is down to 31% , that's got to tell you something. Turning a blind eye to all the atrocities being committed , the haphazard manner things are bieing done and the sheer arrogance and ignorance exhibited by trump does not bode well for your party. Is it your party anymore ? Honestly when you give up your honesty and integrity what do.you have left of value.? Didn't the narcissistic personality disorder , the paranoid personality disorder , the sociopathic tendencies , the pathological lying hint that something might be very wrong with this man. And now that the dementia is setting in can you really keep supporting this regime of shame. At least the felon status and the adjudicated rapist status should have hinted he is not the right man to lead a good people anywhere. The constant baggering of most of the population is a disgrace just in case you even questioned that. And no one has botched more about what's wrong with America than this drama queen. Coward , liar. What is good about this person. He is toxic. And now he's firing people again because they aren't criminal enough to satisfy him. Flunked es like Hegseth will cling to trump. He's willing to screw anyone who gets in his way. And is willing NG to go half-cocked into any situation. Totally unfit for the job just like his hero trump.
JanetTheGreat
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2025
- 1,262
- 1,718
- 1,908
We can criticize Trump in other areas, sure, but I'm not interested in the "he is racist" type of talk.
However I can see the argument for him being a misogynist - he's been divorced 4 times, he has made many questionable decisions relating to women, along with his connections to Epstein.
Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 29,730
- 11,241
- 465
I didn't watch the YouTube 'expert' video you vomited out. There is no like/dislike variable.
You're like bad AI.He said Springfield, OH. Haitians are the primary immigrants there. It's a small town and it's obvious who he was talking about.
Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 29,730
- 11,241
- 465
You.
Who cares if you are interested? Your "interest" has no bearing on whether or not Trump is a racist.
Gee, he said our only black President wasn't an American citizen. I wonder why?
Last edited:
Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 29,730
- 11,241
- 465
Don't care.
You don't get to define the parameters of conversation. If the subject hurts your feelz, you bow out. We get it.Yeah.
IM2
Diamond Member
- Mar 11, 2015
- 114,210
- 145,866
- 3,645
Whether you are interested or not, he is a racist.
Case Summary
This case was brought against Fred and Donald Trump, and their real estate company, in 1973 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
In October 1973, the Justice Department filed this civil rights case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (federal court in Brooklyn) against Fred Trump, Donald Trump, and their real estate company. The complaint alleged that the firm had committed systemic violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 in their many complexes--39 buildings, between them containing over 14,000 apartments. The allegations included evidence from black and white "testers" who had sought to rent apartments; the white testers were told of vacancies; the black testers were not, or were steered to apartment complexes with a higher proportion of racial minorities. The complaint also alleged that Trump employees had placed codes next to housing applicant names to indicate if they were black.
After two years, the matter settled with a consent decree, signed June 10, 1975. It included the ordinary disclaimer of liability (the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation), but prohibited the Trumps from "discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling." In addition to a general injunction against discrimination, the decree prohibits specific discriminatory practices, such as lying about the availability of apartments or interfering with individuals' enjoyment of their housing rights through threats or coercion. Fred and Donald Trump were ordered to "thoroughly acquaint themselves personally on a detailed basis" with the Fair Housing Act. The agreement also required the Trumps to place ads informing minorities they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at their properties. According to a contemporary article in the New York Times, Trump Management was required to furnish the New York Urban League with a weekly list of all apartment vacancies, for two years; the League would get three days to provide qualified applicants for every fifth vacancy in Trump buildings where fewer than 10 percent of the tenants were black.
The Justice Department called the decree “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.” Newspaper headlines echoed that assessment. The New York Amsterdam News, for example, titled its article “Minorities win housing suit,” and told readers that “qualified Blacks and Puerto Ricans now have the opportunity to rent apartments owned by Trump Management.”
Then there is the Central Park Five, his claims against Obama, his opening statement of his first presidential campaign, an his 2024 campaign was straight racism. You choose not to be interested in that but you can see all the misogyny. Funny how that happens.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 91,239
- 45,696
- 2,615
The planet reality
Are you claiming those MAGArats didn’t injure those cops?
What planet are YOU from?
- Thread starter
- #240
That is why you can't hold your own in debates. I tried to help you.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Dr. Oz: “We have shut down just in the last ten weeks 221 hospices.”- Started by Dont Taz Me Bro
- Replies: 1
-
