Tim Walz Accused Of Stolen Valor By Other Members Of His Unit

How about Newsweek?


Walz is not a retired sergeants major, command or otherwise
No, but he served as a CSM.

CSM is both a rank and a position.

He served in the position, but didn't attain the rank.
 
He retired as a master sergeant

having retired in 2005 as command sergeant major for the 1-125th Battalion of the 1st Brigade Combat Team

Nope. He was reduced in rank after he retired. His rank was command sergeant major while on active duty. Again, you are simply dishonest.
 

having retired in 2005 as command sergeant major for the 1-125th Battalion of the 1st Brigade Combat Team

Nope. He was reduced in rank after he retired. His rank was command sergeant major while on active duty. Again, you are simply dishonest.
I have another source that says otherwise


Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé, the state public affairs officer for Minnesota National Guard, told Just the News on Wednesday that the governor did not retire as "Command Sergeant Major Walz" in 2005, as stated on Minnesota's official website, but as master sergeant "because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy." A soldier who does not complete the requisite coursework is automatically demoted, according to Army regulations.
 
I have another source that says otherwise


Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé, the state public affairs officer for Minnesota National Guard, told Just the News on Wednesday that the governor did not retire as "Command Sergeant Major Walz" in 2005, as stated on Minnesota's official website, but as master sergeant "because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy." A soldier who does not complete the requisite coursework is automatically demoted, according to Army regulations.
How can the Minnesota national guard dispute something they put on the national guard website?

By the way it's a misquote.

"He retired as a master sergeant in 2005 for benefit purposes because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy,"

So yet again quoting misleading information.

So, what does that mean? He had the responsibilities, was referred to by the rank of Command Sergeant Major, was even paid as a command sergeant major on active duty. So why can't you simply be honest. Why do you need to claim he lied when he refers to himself as in the rank he retired? Are you really that freaking petty and dishonest?
 
How can the Minnesota national guard dispute something they put on the national guard website?

By the way it's a misquote.

"He retired as a master sergeant in 2005 for benefit purposes because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy,"

So yet again quoting misleading information.

So, what does that mean? He had the responsibilities, was referred to by the rank of Command Sergeant Major, was even paid as a command sergeant major on active duty. So why can't you simply be honest. Why do you need to claim he lied when he refers to himself as in the rank he retired? Are you really that freaking petty and dishonest?
People make mistakes

Your reference is written by Sgt. Mary Flynn

My correction comes from Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé
 
People make mistakes

Your reference is written by Sgt. Mary Flynn

My correction comes from Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé
Your correction dropping the qualification in the statement you mean. For BENEFIT PURPOSUS.

In other words, not only are you claiming that a person only has a rank when that person completes all the requirements stated in the regulations for that rank. Regardless of actually receiving the promotion and the benefits and responsibilities going with that rank. But you are claiming that referring to yourself in the rank you retired, regardless of receiving a promotion to that rank is a purposeful lie.

Again, MAC-7 you are a dishonest human being that is willing to lie to strangers to further your political affiliation. Not only a purposeless thing to do. But something that speaks badly of yourself as a human being. Now I'm done responding to obvious gaslighting, but you should be ashamed for disrespecting veterans for political affiliation.
 
In other words, not only are you claiming that a person only has a rank when that person completes all the requirements stated in the regulations for that rank.
I’m saying he was never more than an acting sergeant major

But his permanent retired rank is master sergeant
 
1723242433847.webp
 
15th post
1723255284515.webp


Guy Who ‘Swift Boated’ John Kerry Is Back At It, This Time To Help Service-Dodging Trump​

Chris LaCivita is reprising his 2004 attacks, this time against Dem VP nominee Tim Walz and for the benefit of Trump, who famously avoided serving in Vietnam.

WASHINGTON — Two decades after attacking a fellow Purple Heart recipient in a political campaign, Chris LaCivita is back at it, this time in service of Donald Trump, who dodged military service by claiming he had bone spurs and who later called U.S. service members “suckers” and “losers.”

Much more at the link below...

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom