Show me those peers. I've asked you 3 separate times. Your link does NOT support your assertion.His peers say he did know
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show me those peers. I've asked you 3 separate times. Your link does NOT support your assertion.His peers say he did know
How about Newsweek?Dude, gateway pundit?
Really?
No, but he served as a CSM.How about Newsweek?
![]()
National Guard disputes Tim Walz's military biography
The Minnesota National Guard said Walz retired as a "master sergeant," not a "command sergeant major," as his biography states.www.newsweek.com
Walz is not a retired sergeants major, command or otherwise
Yes, brieflyNo, but he served as a CSM.
CSM is both a rank and a position.
He served in the position, but didn't attain the rank.
Not sure what your point is. He had the position, he could rightfully called a Sergeant Major...Yes, briefly
He retired as a master sergeantNot sure what your point is. He had the position, he could rightfully called a Sergeant Major...
He retired as a master sergeant
I have another source that says otherwise![]()
Guard unit recognized for record deployment
ARLINGTON, Va. - A recently-returned Minnesota National Guard unit is getting the kudos it deserves this week.The House of Representatives passed a Concurrent Resolution Oct. 1 that commended Soldierswww.nationalguard.mil
having retired in 2005 as command sergeant major for the 1-125th Battalion of the 1st Brigade Combat Team
Nope. He was reduced in rank after he retired. His rank was command sergeant major while on active duty. Again, you are simply dishonest.
How can the Minnesota national guard dispute something they put on the national guard website?I have another source that says otherwise
MSN
www.msn.com
Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé, the state public affairs officer for Minnesota National Guard, told Just the News on Wednesday that the governor did not retire as "Command Sergeant Major Walz" in 2005, as stated on Minnesota's official website, but as master sergeant "because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy." A soldier who does not complete the requisite coursework is automatically demoted, according to Army regulations.
People make mistakesHow can the Minnesota national guard dispute something they put on the national guard website?
By the way it's a misquote.
"He retired as a master sergeant in 2005 for benefit purposes because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy,"
![]()
Minnesota National Guard confirms VP nominee Tim Walz demoted, calling into question official bio
Gov. Walz's biography boasts a higher National Guard rank than he retired with after he was automatically demoted for failing to fulfill obligations of his promotion. He also bailed out on his unit before deployment in Iraq.justthenews.com
So yet again quoting misleading information.
So, what does that mean? He had the responsibilities, was referred to by the rank of Command Sergeant Major, was even paid as a command sergeant major on active duty. So why can't you simply be honest. Why do you need to claim he lied when he refers to himself as in the rank he retired? Are you really that freaking petty and dishonest?
Your correction dropping the qualification in the statement you mean. For BENEFIT PURPOSUS.People make mistakes
Your reference is written by Sgt. Mary Flynn
My correction comes from Army Lieutenant Colonel Kristen Augé
Cool. So what? You’re splitting hairs.He retired as a master sergeant
I’m saying he was never more than an acting sergeant majorIn other words, not only are you claiming that a person only has a rank when that person completes all the requirements stated in the regulations for that rank.
And held the position of Sergeant Major.He retired as a master sergeant