Those of you against destruction of the drug-hauling boats... question...

[Concerned American]

You are the one who introduced the United Nations Convention into the topic. I replied to your post where you talked about the United Nations Convention. If you don't want to use the United Nations Convention to support your view on the destruction of drug hauling boats then you shouldn't have introduced the United Nations Convention into the topic, Bingo Brain.

You don't get to cut up the post, moron. That's a violation of the rules of the board. The post clearly said UNCLOS. Truncating the LAW OF THE SEAS is changing the topic. Also, Iraq is not even in the same hemisphere as the Caribbean and they don't have a sea. STFU. If you continue to attempt to derail the thread, you will be reported. Now address the topic or GTFOH.

 

[Clipper]

You're a blithering idiot. WTF, did you find a post that I said anything about Biden re: Hernandez. LOL, you can't even keep your own posts straight. Run along junior.

Trump brought up Biden was asked about Hernandez, you moron. So I rubbed your nose in it.

Have another shit sandwich, Trump humper.

 

[Concerned American]

Trump brought up Biden was asked about Hernandez, you moron. So I rubbed your nose in it.

Have another shit sandwich, Trump humper.

You're not replying to Trump, moron. SMFH terminal TDS.

 

[GLASNOST]

You don't get to cut up the post, moron. That's a violation of the rules of the board. The post clearly said UNCLOS. Truncating the LAW OF THE SEAS is changing the topic. Also, Iraq is not even in the same hemisphere as the Caribbean and they don't have a sea. STFU. If you continue to attempt to derail the thread, you will be reported. Now address the topic or GTFOH.

Here is your post below. NOTE: It is uncut.

None of these boats were flying a flag of any nation. They fall under anti-piracy laws as unflagged vessels. UNCLOS--United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

You brought the United Nations Convention into the topic because you thought it was relevant. I question its relevancy by examples of United Nations Convention's failures but now you want to say that I am off topic. If you are struggling with the concept of example then I suggest you read my post again. I say that you are off topic with posts such as "STFU", "GTFOH", and "moron". The problem here is that your application of the United Nations Convention to "the destruction of the drug-hauling boats" is (in its practicality) being challenged and you can’t take the pain.

 

[Concerned American]

Here is your post below. NOTE: It is uncut.


You brought the United Nations Convention into the topic because you thought it was relevant. I question its relevancy by examples of United Nations Convention's failures but now you want to say that I am off topic. If you are struggling with the concept of example then I suggest you read my post again. I say that you are off topic with posts such as "STFU", "GTFOH", and "moron". The problem here is that your application of the United Nations Convention to "the destruction of the drug-hauling boats" is (in its practicality) being challenged and you can’t take the pain.

Reported

 

[GLASNOST]

Reported

 

[georgephillip]

Let's say several missiles were launched against the USA that contained drugs that could kill millions of Americans.
Would you still be against shooting down the missiles?

When did alleged drug dealers qualify for extrajudicial execution?

If a legitimate law enforcement officer sees a drug deal in progress, is she entitled to murdered the seller on the spot?

 

[GLASNOST]

Let's say several missiles were launched against the USA that contained drugs that could kill millions of Americans. Would you still be against shooting down the missiles?

When did alleged drug dealers qualify for extrajudicial execution?

If a legitimate law enforcement officer sees a drug deal in progress, is she entitled to murdered the seller on the spot?

You're asking the hard questions now.

 

[mudwhistle]

Having a bad reputation in trumpworld most often means the reporting is spot on. The more accurate the report the louder Dotard screams "fake news."

No, dipshit. When media sources are caught lying to us, we don't listen to them anymore.

But you leftists don't care if they lie to you or not.

All you want to hear is that Trump sucks.

 

[healthmyths]

You're asking the hard questions now.

What a dumb statement!

A law enforcement officer can shoot a suspected lawbreaker only when they have a reasonable belief that the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or another person.
Deadly force may not be used solely to prevent an escape if the suspect is not an imminent threat.

When Is Police Use of Force Justified? How Officers Think

When is police use of force justified? AMU's criminal justice degrees provide useful insights into the use of force and other issues in criminal justice.

www.amu.apus.edu

These boats are carrying "imminent threats" of deaths to thousands of people and that's ok with you?

 

[georgephillip]

You're asking the hard questions now.

Regarding the strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, Trump has managed to switch the legal framework from law enforcement, which requires arrest and due process, to military actions governed by the law of armed conflict.

International law states drug trafficking is a crime, not an act of war, and the individuals involved are civilians, not soldiers:

GoogleAI Overview

• "War Crimes Allegations: Specific incidents, such as an alleged 'double tap' strike where survivors of an initial attack were killed in a follow-up strike, have raised accusations of potential war crimes and violations of the Geneva Conventions' protections for shipwrecked persons.
• Lack of Evidence and Due Process: Critics point out that the administration has not publicly provided evidence that the targeted boats were carrying drugs or that the individuals on board were high-level cartel members, emphasizing the lack of due process. "

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Altering posts is a no no

 

[GLASNOST]

When did alleged drug dealers qualify for extrajudicial execution?

If a legitimate law enforcement officer sees a drug deal in progress, is she entitled to murdered the seller on the spot?

You're asking the hard questions now.

What a dumb statement!

I can see by your response that georgephillip's question is much too hard for you. Is your reply a Freudian slip or are you "coming clean" and openly admitting you screwed yourself?

 

[GLASNOST]

Regarding the strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, Trump has managed to switch the legal framework from law enforcement, which requires arrest and due process, to military actions governed by the law of armed conflict.

International law states drug trafficking is a crime, not an act of war, and the individuals involved are civilians, not soldiers:

I like Trump so it disheartens me to see that he's got several flaws.

 

[healthmyths]

Regarding the strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, Trump has managed to switch the legal framework from law enforcement, which requires arrest and due process, to military actions governed by the law of armed conflict.

International law states drug trafficking is a crime, not an act of war, and the individuals involved are civilians, not soldiers:

GoogleAI Overview

• "War Crimes Allegations: Specific incidents, such as an alleged 'double tap' strike where survivors of an initial attack were killed in a follow-up strike, have raised accusations of potential war crimes and violations of the Geneva Conventions' protections for shipwrecked persons.
• Lack of Evidence and Due Process: Critics point out that the administration has not publicly provided evidence that the targeted boats were carrying drugs or that the individuals on board were high-level cartel members, emphasizing the lack of due process. "

First of all YOU and your dummy associates NEVER provide any sources, substantiation, etc.!!!

So where was your angst when Obama did it?

During his presidency, Barack Obama's administration pursued a strategy that included targeting high-level "narco-terrorists" in Afghanistan for "kill or capture" operations, and U.S. forces killed individuals in related operations, though specific numbers for "traders" are not publicly confirmed
.
The Obama administration gave the U.S. military approval to target certain Taliban-connected drug lords who were placed on a classified "kill list". These individuals were considered legitimate military targets because their drug networks provided funding for the insurgency and posed a security threat to U.S. forces.

U.S. Military Working to 'Kill or Capture' 50 Taliban Drug Lords

In a dramatic change of policy ordered by the Obama administration, the U.S. military has been given approval to "kill or capture" 50 Taliban-connected drug lords whose names are on a classified "kill list" being circulated to commanders, according to a report prepared for the Senate Foreign...

abcnews.go.com

 

[Edgetho]

None of those boats were flying the Flag of any Nation. They were occupied by armed Men carrying dangerous substances in International Waters.

They were, by every definition "Stateless Vessels" Which is the very meaning of a Pirate Ship.

Pirate Ships and those aboard them have NO (Zero) (0) rights. They can be summarily executed by anybody, at any time, for any reason. Period.

Look it up, dimocrap scum. Or, just continue to take the DISGUSTING FILTH'S word for it and remain stupid.

A Stateless Vessel with armed men aboard has no rights. At all. Ever.

dimocraps are the scum of the Earth. ALL of them. ESPECIALLY the voters

 

[M14 Shooter]

None of those boats were flying the Flag of any Nation. They were occupied by armed Men carrying dangerous substances in International Waters.
They were, by every definition "Stateless Vessels" Which is the very meaning of a Pirate Ship.

https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3102&context=ils

 

[braalian]

Let's say several missiles were launched against the USA that contained drugs that could kill millions of Americans.
Would you still be against shooting down the missiles?

I actually support the administration on the whole drug boat thing, but your post here makes you seem like you have some sort of learning disability, it’s that stupid of a comparison

 

[GLASNOST]

First of all YOU and your dummy associates NEVER provide any sources, substantiation, etc.!!!

So where was your angst when Obama did it?

During his presidency, Barack Obama's administration pursued a strategy that included targeting high-level "narco-terrorists" in Afghanistan for "kill or capture" operations, and U.S. forces killed individuals in related operations, though specific numbers for "traders" are not publicly confirmed
.
The Obama administration gave the U.S. military approval to target certain Taliban-connected drug lords who were placed on a classified "kill list". These individuals were considered legitimate military targets because their drug networks provided funding for the insurgency and posed a security threat to U.S. forces.

U.S. Military Working to 'Kill or Capture' 50 Taliban Drug Lords

In a dramatic change of policy ordered by the Obama administration, the U.S. military has been given approval to "kill or capture" 50 Taliban-connected drug lords whose names are on a classified "kill list" being circulated to commanders, according to a report prepared for the Senate Foreign...

abcnews.go.com

The problem with people like you is that you make statements with no credible substantiation plus the fact that you don't know the difference between Trump and Obama. If you need help to differentiate them, here's a hint - one is darker than the other.

 

[Edgetho]

I actually support the administration on the whole drug boat thing, but your post here makes you seem like you have some sort of learning disability, it’s that stupid of a comparison

I believe the word you're looking for is "analogy"

But yes, it is rather silly

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more



a·nal·o·gy
/əˈnaləjē/

noun

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
   "an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"