This shit is getting old.

[beagle9]

What gets old to me is the fact that while skin color does elicit a knee-jerk negative reaction from a certain portion of the right, it provides what amounts to immunity for a MUCH larger portion of the left. So eager they are to prove they are not racist, they become racialists to a degree far greater than that which they oppose. Being black or being Muslim acts as a "get out of jail free" card to these people, so automatic is their denial, obfuscation, apologia and sophistry.

Thats weird. I wonder why Blacks are arrested and incarcerated at a higher rate for drugs than white people when white people are shown to be involved in the selling and use of drugs more often? Where is that get out of jail free card again?

Do you have proof of this accusation ?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That's the point, if you defend bad behavior or bad people, you are an apologist. That's the definition. Do you understand?!!

Of course I do, and thanks for proving my point. The following statements are those of an apologist AND an ignorant alarmist:

Arm yourself and shoot to kill"..(instead of allowing the law to do their job)

"A need for the presence of the KKK" (vigilantism by white sheet wearing, hooded criminals?! really?!)

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"(there are likely more law abiding, hard working non whites in America than not, why should they be shipped anywhere? The very notion of such a concept is that of an utter loon....look in the mirror.)

Now.....Do YOU understand?

Damn right "arm yourself and shoot to kill" because you know damn well the cops are worthless in most situations,but if you want to rely on em to save your ass feel free.

Well, "Wyatt Earp", the police have never failed to respond when I have called for help. The best way that I have found for avoiding trouble is not looking for it....as opposed to "wishing for it" as you seem to be doing.

That being said, you appear to have an itchy trigger finger coupled with a bad attitude, which is a winning formula for ending up in jail getting hosed every night by "big boy", with no guns to defend yourself.

So as you sit huddled in the corner, cradling your weaponry, and hoping for someone to break into your home and find you, I would much rather be enjoying life.

To each his own.

If you had time to sit around and wait for the police,you were never in any real danger to begin with. *****...

There is a difference between being in imminent danger and perceiving the world around you to be one big threat, Marshall Dillon. Your most dangerous threat would probably be shooting yourself by accident.

LOL...I've owned guns and hunted for over forty years,and have used one in a self defense situation and was lucky enough not to have to kill anyone.
So go **** yourself Jr.

 

[Ernie S.]

1. Most of the people on welfare are African-Americans.

Fact: Think again! The margin between Caucasians and African-Americans who are on welfare is extremely narrow — 38.8 percent of Caucasians, and 39.8 percent of African-Americans are on welfare.

3. Most woman on welfare continue to have babies so that they can maximize the amount of benefits that they receive.

Fact: The average family on welfare has 2.8 children. Furthermore, only one out of every 10 mothers on welfare has more than 3 children.

The premise of this is that people claim there are more blacks on welfare. Doing the math tells us that nearly 3 in 10 blacks are on welfare compared to about in 20 whites.

It's a bit akin to trying to justify black murder rates by contending that whites murder almost as many.

No, not all blacks are murderers or on welfare, but the discrepancy with other demographics is staggering.

That shit is indeed getting old.

? I'm not sure how you are working the math out here.

38.8 percent of Caucasians are on welfare
39.8 percent of African-Americans are on welfare

That is almost the same percentage within each group.

Seriously?

Whew! OK, step by step. Please pay attention here. 38.8% of those on welfare are white and 39.8 are black. The remainder is the difference, so largely Latino and some Asian etc.

Therefore, as a population as a whole, about 5% of whites and 30% of blacks are on welfare.

Get someone to help you if you need figuring this out.

That isn't what my link said - if the link is wrong - then refute it.

The link said, verbatim:
38.8 percent of Caucasians, and 39.8 percent of African-Americans are on welfare.

You read English right?

Go to the link provided in your link. You will see this:

Welfare Demographics
Percent of recipients who are white	38.8 %
Percent of recipients who are black	39.8 %
Percent of recipients who are Hispanic	15.7 %
Percent of recipients who are Asian	2.4 %
Percent of recipients who are Other	3.3 %

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Your article misstated the facts. I'm willing to bet that, given the prejudice displayed in the article as a whole, the misstatement was intentional.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What gets old to me is the fact that while skin color does elicit a knee-jerk negative reaction from a certain portion of the right, it provides what amounts to immunity for a MUCH larger portion of the left. So eager they are to prove they are not racist, they become racialists to a degree far greater than that which they oppose. Being black or being Muslim acts as a "get out of jail free" card to these people, so automatic is their denial, obfuscation, apologia and sophistry.

Thats weird. I wonder why Blacks are arrested and incarcerated at a higher rate for drugs than white people when white people are shown to be involved in the selling and use of drugs more often? Where is that get out of jail free card again?

Drug dealer ........

 

[Rotagilla]

Whites are appx 70% of the overall population with (allegedly) 38% of that number on welfare.
Negroes are appx 13% of the overall population with 39% of that number on welfare.
A disproportionate number of negroes are on welfare based on overall population.
Basic math. Anyone who pretends to not understand is lying.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This is as clear as it gets.

According to What percentage of people in US are on welfare
http://www.chacha.com/question/what-percentage-of-people-on-welfare-are-white,-black,-or-hispanic

- 29 million people are on welfare
- 39% white: 11,661,000
- 38% black: 11,362,000

According to Demographics of the United States - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
- US population: 313,544,041
- White: 72.4%: 227,005,885
- Black: 12.6%: 39,506,549

Math time!:

Whites: 11.661,000 / 227,005,885 * 100 = 5.13%
Blacks: 11,362,000 / 39,506,549 * 100 = 28.75%

 

[Kathy Tazzo]

It's never clear to the apologists.

It's never clear to the apologists.

The true "apologists" in this thread should learn the definition of the word. Which is:
"One who speaks or writes in defense of someone or something"

For example:

"Arm yourself and shoot to kill"

"A need for the presence of the KKK"

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"


There is a vast difference between the above and simply asking a question regarding the meaning of a vague statement like: "What iis it with liberals and percentages?"
especially when the individual who makes the statement does not know whether the person they are addressing is a "liberal" or not.

Understand?

That's the point, if you defend bad behavior or bad people, you are an apologist. That's the definition. Do you understand?!!

Of course I do, and thanks for proving my point. The following statements are those of an apologist AND an ignorant alarmist:

Arm yourself and shoot to kill"..(instead of allowing the law to do their job)

"A need for the presence of the KKK" (vigilantism by white sheet wearing, hooded criminals?! really?!)

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"(there are likely more law abiding, hard working non whites in America than not, why should they be shipped anywhere? The very notion of such a concept is that of an utter loon....look in the mirror.)

Now.....Do YOU understand?

What's wrong with arming yourself and shooting to kill if your life is in danger? What's wrong with the need for a White civil rights group? The africans can have the black panthers but we can't have anybody protecting us? The africans can have civil rights leaders but we're not allowed to, a country founded for us, in which africans are guests here? africans whine about slavery, about being brought her, hey, feel free to go back to the homeland since ya'll are so miserable here. Lastly, I support shipping all whites out of here since this country was founded and intended to be the new and/or second home for Europeans. The Founding Fathers never intended this country to become the Crap Stew is is today. Bring me your tired and poor referred to Europeans, not every Third World, uneducated, worthless people who contribute nothing or very little to this country. Now, do you understand the White point of view?

 

[reconmark]

The Economix blog at the New York Times reported the following in February of last year:

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

 

[Rotagilla]

The Economix blog at the New York Times reported the following in February of last year:

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

..and whites pay the majority of taxes in this country while taking in a far smaller percentage of benefits per capita....but your blog "source" isn't valid anyway..LMAO..a blog....Typical.

 

[reconmark]

It's never clear to the apologists.

It's never clear to the apologists.

The true "apologists" in this thread should learn the definition of the word. Which is:
"One who speaks or writes in defense of someone or something"

For example:

"Arm yourself and shoot to kill"

"A need for the presence of the KKK"

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"


There is a vast difference between the above and simply asking a question regarding the meaning of a vague statement like: "What iis it with liberals and percentages?"
especially when the individual who makes the statement does not know whether the person they are addressing is a "liberal" or not.

Understand?

That's the point, if you defend bad behavior or bad people, you are an apologist. That's the definition. Do you understand?!!

Of course I do, and thanks for proving my point. The following statements are those of an apologist AND an ignorant alarmist:

Arm yourself and shoot to kill"..(instead of allowing the law to do their job)

"A need for the presence of the KKK" (vigilantism by white sheet wearing, hooded criminals?! really?!)

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"(there are likely more law abiding, hard working non whites in America than not, why should they be shipped anywhere? The very notion of such a concept is that of an utter loon....look in the mirror.)

Now.....Do YOU understand?

What's wrong with arming yourself and shooting to kill if your life is in danger? What's wrong with the need for a White civil rights group? The africans can have the black panthers but we can't have anybody protecting us? The africans can have civil rights leaders but we're not allowed to, a country founded for us, in which africans are guests here? africans whine about slavery, about being brought her, hey, feel free to go back to the homeland since ya'll are so miserable here. Lastly, I support shipping all whites out of here since this country was founded and intended to be the new and/or second home for Europeans. The Founding Fathers never intended this country to become the Crap Stew is is today. Bring me your tired and poor referred to Europeans, not every Third World, uneducated, worthless people who contribute nothing or very little to this country. Now, do you understand the White point of view?

Your post is superbly ignorant...
Did you just get your special ed certificate from Storm Front Elementary???

Please list any actions performed by the Black Panthers in the last 30 years???
Africans are guests here...who invited them???, this should be funny.
"Lastly, I support shipping all whites out of here.."...by all means get to stepping.
"Bring me your tired and poor referred to Europeans"...cite please.


"africans whine about slavery, about being brought her, hey, feel free to go back to the homeland since ya'll are so miserable here. "
Poor, uneducated, unintelligent whites seem mighty whiny, your rant as an example, are your bags packed for Europe yet?

 

[reconmark]

The Economix blog at the New York Times reported the following in February of last year:

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

..and whites pay the majority of taxes in this country while taking in a far smaller percentage of benefits per capita....but your blog "source" isn't valid anyway..LMAO..a blog....Typical.

So you couldn't refute the facts or numbers...LOL!!!!

 

[Rotagilla]

The Economix blog at the New York Times reported the following in February of last year:

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

..and whites pay the majority of taxes in this country while taking in a far smaller percentage of benefits per capita....but your blog "source" isn't valid anyway..LMAO..a blog....Typical.

So you couldn't refute the facts or numbers...LOL!!!!

So you couldn't find a legitimate source to support your weak argument....LMAO....there's no need to "refute" a blog.

 

[reconmark]

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is one of the nation’s premier policy organizations working at the federal and state levels on fiscal policy and public programs that affect low- and moderate-income families and individuals.



Also, contrary to what a substantial share of Americans may assume, non-Hispanic whites receive slightly more than their proportionate share of entitlement benefits. Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 64 percent of the population in 2010 and received 69 percent of the entitlement benefits. In contrast, Hispanics made up 16 percent of the population but received 12 percent of the benefits, less than their proportionate share — likely because they are a younger population and also because immigrants, including many legal immigrants, are ineligible for various benefits. Non-Hispanic African Americans account for 12 percent of the population and received 14 percent of the benefits

About Center on Budget and Policy Priorities mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

 

[Meathead]

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

Fact is that the study included social security for retirees and handicapped accounting for over 70% of government benefits. A rather inept attempt at diluting the parasitic proclivities of African-Americans.

Again, about 1 in 20 whites are on welfare compared to 3 in 10 blacks.

Facts

 

[katsteve2012]

It's never clear to the apologists.

It's never clear to the apologists.

The true "apologists" in this thread should learn the definition of the word. Which is:
"One who speaks or writes in defense of someone or something"

For example:

"Arm yourself and shoot to kill"

"A need for the presence of the KKK"

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"


There is a vast difference between the above and simply asking a question regarding the meaning of a vague statement like: "What iis it with liberals and percentages?"
especially when the individual who makes the statement does not know whether the person they are addressing is a "liberal" or not.

Understand?

That's the point, if you defend bad behavior or bad people, you are an apologist. That's the definition. Do you understand?!!

Of course I do, and thanks for proving my point. The following statements are those of an apologist AND an ignorant alarmist:

Arm yourself and shoot to kill"..(instead of allowing the law to do their job)

"A need for the presence of the KKK" (vigilantism by white sheet wearing, hooded criminals?! really?!)

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"(there are likely more law abiding, hard working non whites in America than not, why should they be shipped anywhere? The very notion of such a concept is that of an utter loon....look in the mirror.)

Now.....Do YOU understand?

What's wrong with arming yourself and shooting to kill if your life is in danger? What's wrong with the need for a White civil rights group? The africans can have the black panthers but we can't have anybody protecting us? The africans can have civil rights leaders but we're not allowed to, a country founded for us, in which africans are guests here? africans whine about slavery, about being brought her, hey, feel free to go back to the homeland since ya'll are so miserable here. Lastly, I support shipping all whites out of here since this country was founded and intended to be the new and/or second home for Europeans. The Founding Fathers never intended this country to become the Crap Stew is is today. Bring me your tired and poor referred to Europeans, not every Third World, uneducated, worthless people who contribute nothing or very little to this country. Now, do you understand the White point of view?

ROFLMAO!
What I really UNDERSTAND now is the depth of your brainwashed, racist ignorance and it is obvious that your "point of view" is that of the lunatic fringe.

Indeed, you must feel hopeless.

Where is it written, that white people "cannot have civil rights leaders"? They DO have them, in abundance. They reside in the Supreme Court of America, they occupy the majority of the police forces in America, and they hold the majority of the political positions of power in the country.

In the workforce they hold the vast majority of the positions of power in the majority of all fortune 500 companies in the country, and therefore control the majority of the nations wealth.

It is the uneducated, disenfranchised, bottom rung of the white population does not recognize this fact, and has been brainwashed into believing that they are actually victims, which they are...but they are victims of THEIR OWN delusions.

Those who believe that the sky is falling because this land is no longer governed by laws that dictate that no other race or ethnicity has the freedom or right to live, work, and be successful in this country EXCEPT for whites.

As far as non whites being "guests here", and what the founding fathers "intentions" were, you need to pick up a history book and re read( if you can read) what the founding principles of this nation were based on.

Lastly, what "Africans" are you speaking of? Every non white white person here is not an "African."

Are you suggesting that non whites who were born here and whose families have been here for generations be shipped out of the country?

If that is the case, try starting a movement to bring that belief to fruition, and get back to me.

 

[reconmark]

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is one of the nation’s premier policy organizations working at the federal and state levels on fiscal policy and public programs that affect low- and moderate-income families and individuals.



Also, contrary to what a substantial share of Americans may assume, non-Hispanic whites receive slightly more than their proportionate share of entitlement benefits. Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 64 percent of the population in 2010 and received 69 percent of the entitlement benefits. In contrast, Hispanics made up 16 percent of the population but received 12 percent of the benefits, less than their proportionate share — likely because they are a younger population and also because immigrants, including many legal immigrants, are ineligible for various benefits. Non-Hispanic African Americans account for 12 percent of the population and received 14 percent of the benefits

About Center on Budget and Policy Priorities mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Any other assertions of your I need to utterly destroy????

 

[reconmark]

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

Fact is that the study included social security for retirees and handicapped accounting for over 70% of government benefits. A rather inept attempt at diluting the parasitic proclivities of African-Americans.

Again, about 1 in 20 whites are on welfare compared to 3 in 10 blacks.

Facts

Ahhh...so you don't like the fact that more whites suck off every government entitlement in the country, so you want to attempt to dismiss the facts as they stand....lol

 

[katsteve2012]

Of course I do, and thanks for proving my point. The following statements are those of an apologist AND an ignorant alarmist:

Arm yourself and shoot to kill"..(instead of allowing the law to do their job)

"A need for the presence of the KKK" (vigilantism by white sheet wearing, hooded criminals?! really?!)

"A need to ship all non whites out of America, or have an all out race war"(there are likely more law abiding, hard working non whites in America than not, why should they be shipped anywhere? The very notion of such a concept is that of an utter loon....look in the mirror.)

Now.....Do YOU understand?

Damn right "arm yourself and shoot to kill" because you know damn well the cops are worthless in most situations,but if you want to rely on em to save your ass feel free.

Well, "Wyatt Earp", the police have never failed to respond when I have called for help. The best way that I have found for avoiding trouble is not looking for it....as opposed to "wishing for it" as you seem to be doing.

That being said, you appear to have an itchy trigger finger coupled with a bad attitude, which is a winning formula for ending up in jail getting hosed every night by "big boy", with no guns to defend yourself.

So as you sit huddled in the corner, cradling your weaponry, and hoping for someone to break into your home and find you, I would much rather be enjoying life.

To each his own.

If you had time to sit around and wait for the police,you were never in any real danger to begin with. *****...

There is a difference between being in imminent danger and perceiving the world around you to be one big threat, Marshall Dillon. Your most dangerous threat would probably be shooting yourself by accident.

LOL...I've owned guns and hunted for over forty years,and have used one in a self defense situation and was lucky enough not to have to kill anyone.
So go **** yourself Jr.

It is a pity that you are not as effective at expressing yourself intelligently as you are at loading and shooting guns.

You were born in the wrong era, cowboy.

 

[Meathead]

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

Fact is that the study included social security for retirees and handicapped accounting for over 70% of government benefits. A rather inept attempt at diluting the parasitic proclivities of African-Americans.

Again, about 1 in 20 whites are on welfare compared to 3 in 10 blacks.

Facts

Ahhh...so you don't like the fact that more whites suck off every government entitlement in the country, so you want to attempt to dismiss the facts as they stand....lol

Do you think retirees who paid into the system are sucking off it? I don't consider that welfare.

 

[Rotagilla]

Another finding of the study is that the distribution of benefits no longer aligns with the demography of poverty. African-Americans, who make up 22 percent of the poor, receive 14 percent of government benefits, close to their 12 percent population share.

White non-Hispanics, who make up 42 percent of the poor, receive 69 percent of government benefits – again, much closer to their 64 percent population share.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...om-the-safety-net/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Time for facts to be presented.
Whites overwhelmingly rake in the majority of all governmental benefits combined.

Fact is that the study included social security for retirees and handicapped accounting for over 70% of government benefits. A rather inept attempt at diluting the parasitic proclivities of African-Americans.

Again, about 1 in 20 whites are on welfare compared to 3 in 10 blacks.

Facts

Ahhh...so you don't like the fact that more whites suck off every government entitlement in the country, so you want to attempt to dismiss the facts as they stand....lol

Whites are the majority in this country...they pay more in taxes than negroes, too, but receive less in benefits as the money is funnelled to prop up negro dysfunctional behavior.
...more negroes are on welfare per capita...That's just a plain fact.