1. I remember writing about this concept, but I don't recall when. Back in 2017, another poster wrote this:
"Cancer can kill you, so it's evil. X-rays and gamma rays can kill you too, so they're evil. But X-rays and gamma rays can kill cancer, so they're good.
Evil things in the hands of good men and women being used against evil, is something people have necessarily had to do ever since creation. Like Orwell said, "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Is Evil Necessary To Counter Evil? post #16
Defeat "evil" by any means necessary?
Is that what we want in political discourse??????
2. Somehow, Democrats saw it in a childish way, as truth, and a way forward in that view, and that political opponents were not just wrong.....they were EVIL, and any method should be used to fight EVIL.
3."NBC's Lester Holt says we don’t need to hear both sides to define truth: ‘Fairness is overrated’
www.foxnews.com
4. What is headlines today, the failed Obama coup against Trump.....just one aspect of the Democrats "fighting evil":
"Barack Hussein Obama is the ringleader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him and so was Sleepy Joe Biden, and so were the rest of them — Comey, Clapper, the whole group. They tired to rig an election and then they got caught," Trump said. "The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold...They tried to rig the election and they got caught, and there should be very severe consequences for that."
“This was treason.”
townhall.com
5.Lie about opponents, impeach, try to imprison.....and yes, loosen security so that they have 'plausible deniability" for an assassination.
What we have come to expect,and to accept, is wrong for America.
This is what has to change: debate, defeat at the ballot box.........but see your opponents as simply having a different view.
"Cancer can kill you, so it's evil. X-rays and gamma rays can kill you too, so they're evil. But X-rays and gamma rays can kill cancer, so they're good.
Evil things in the hands of good men and women being used against evil, is something people have necessarily had to do ever since creation. Like Orwell said, "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Is Evil Necessary To Counter Evil? post #16
Defeat "evil" by any means necessary?
Is that what we want in political discourse??????
2. Somehow, Democrats saw it in a childish way, as truth, and a way forward in that view, and that political opponents were not just wrong.....they were EVIL, and any method should be used to fight EVIL.
3."NBC's Lester Holt says we don’t need to hear both sides to define truth: ‘Fairness is overrated’
'In the real world, Holt's advice simply justifies media political bias,' William A. Jacobson said
NBC's Lester Holt says we don’t need to hear both sides to define truth: ‘Fairness is overrated’
NBC News anchor Lester Holt received praise from liberal media figures after saying reporters don’t need to hear both sides of a story before determining the "truth."
4. What is headlines today, the failed Obama coup against Trump.....just one aspect of the Democrats "fighting evil":
"Barack Hussein Obama is the ringleader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him and so was Sleepy Joe Biden, and so were the rest of them — Comey, Clapper, the whole group. They tired to rig an election and then they got caught," Trump said. "The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold...They tried to rig the election and they got caught, and there should be very severe consequences for that."
“This was treason.”
Trump Goes Scorched Earth on Hoax Ringleader Obama
Trump calls Obama the ringleader of the Russia hoax, accusing him and others of election rigging.
5.Lie about opponents, impeach, try to imprison.....and yes, loosen security so that they have 'plausible deniability" for an assassination.
What we have come to expect,and to accept, is wrong for America.
This is what has to change: debate, defeat at the ballot box.........but see your opponents as simply having a different view.