This is cooling?

[Old Rocks]

So, 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 13 years has no meaning?

Anthony Watts has generated a huge amount of blogospheric attention with his report on Steve McIntyre’s recalculation of temperature trends. It turns out that the Y2K bug skewed previous data from this decade.
Four of the top 10 years of US CONUS high temperature deviations are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900.
data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt.

Crap. The US is 2% of the worlds area. We are talking about the worldwide temperatures. And the top 11 of those have occured in the last 13 years.

Anthony Watts is an expert at creating lies out of half truths. And the people that read his material and fail to research the sources are fools.

 

[elvis]

Anthony Watts has generated a huge amount of blogospheric attention with his report on Steve McIntyre’s recalculation of temperature trends. It turns out that the Y2K bug skewed previous data from this decade.
Four of the top 10 years of US CONUS high temperature deviations are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900.
data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt.

Crap. The US is 2% of the worlds area. We are talking about the worldwide temperatures. And the top 11 of those have occured in the last 13 years.

Anthony Watts is an expert at creating lies out of half truths. And the people that read his material and fail to research the sources are fools.

You tell her, Tipper.

 

[Old Rocks]

Fuck you asshole. One ninth warmest January or February is irrelevant to whether or not we are cooling or warming. Shows you either know nothing about scientific research or you are just an asshole, or both.

So, 11 of the warmest years on record in the last 13 years has no meaning?

for starters, you were talking about MONTHS, not YEARS, moron.

Cretin, 12 of those months add up to a year. And when the first two months of a year that is supposed to be the start of a descent into a dangerous cooling period turn out to be in the top ten of the years that are on record, it does not look to good for you "global Coolers".

 

[Old Rocks]

it will get hotter and hotter and hotter....only american legislators of the democrat persussion can stop it.....no one else.....

Since the Republicans have chosen as their spokesman a drug addict that has a radio show, and constantly lies concerning matters of science, it looks like if anyone in the government does do anything to address the problem, it will be the Democrats. Not that I have any great hopes. Money has just as great of an influence there as with the Republicans.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Crap. The US is 2% of the worlds area. We are talking about the worldwide temperatures. And the top 11 of those have occured in the last 13 years.

Anthony Watts is an expert at creating lies out of half truths. And the people that read his material and fail to research the sources are fools.

Crap? Feisty, aren't you, Old Mineral-Mind. Now, be gneiss, don't be a piece of schist.

You and your fellow alarmists get so excited when holes are punched in your toy balloon. I notice that you didn't comment on the statements of Professor Delgado Domingos, above. Can't call him "expert at creating lies" ?

Let's see the reasons that anyone puts credence into your nonsense:
"Take funding for global warming research, for example. Over the past decade, research intended to prove the veracity of man-made global warming has been funded to the tune of $50 billion, while global warming skeptic research has received a comparatively measly $19 million. That’s over 260,000 percent more funding for the alarmists!"

And how about the attention given to this stuff:
“Of the three networks (ABC, NBC and CBS), 80 percent of stories (167 out of 205) didn’t mention skepticism or anyone at all who dissented from global warming. cBS did the absolute worst job. Ninety-seven percent of its stories ignored other opinions” (“Global Warming Censored”).
The lesson: Transforming a lie into truth before an unwitting public is made easier by silencing dissenting opinions. Eighty percent of news stories omitted the opposing view altogether."

A Really Inconvenient Truth | theTrumpet.com