This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett

[Oswald Was Innocent]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[AZrailwhale]

.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Oh look....another MAGA racist bumpkin who thinks he knows more about the law than Ketanji Brown Jackson.

How surprising.

 

[IM2]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Actually it is Coney Barrett's opinion that goes against precedent as well as the Constitution. And since white women benefited the most from DEI, Coney Barrett is the DEI autopen hire.

 

[Oswald Was Innocent]

who thinks he knows more about the law than Ketanji Brown Jackson.

How surprising.

And you want to know what else is surprising? I know what a woman is unlike Ketanji who doesn't.

 

[Oswald Was Innocent]

Actually it is Coney Barrett's opinion that goes against precedent as well as the Constitution.

Not true!

 

[IM2]

And you want to know what else is surprising? I know what a woman is unlike Ketanji who doesn't.

Kitanje Jackson knows what a woman is, but you don't know squat about the law.

 

[Darkwind]

Actually it is Coney Barrett's opinion that goes against precedent as well as the Constitution. And since white women benefited the most from DEI, Coney Barrett is the DEI autopen hire.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Not true!

Federal judges have issued nationwide injunctions for decades. It was never a problem....until now.

Yes, this is a radical Supreme Court.

 

[IM2]

The opinion from Coney Brret will go down in history with Justice Taney, and that is not a good place to be.

 

[BackAgain]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

That excerpt of Amy’s opinion is brilliant. And it’s also a perfect bullseye.

 

[BackAgain]

The opinion from Coney Brret will go down in history with Justice Taney, and that is not a good place to be.

And your opinion ^ is even dumber than the shit penned by Jackson. Pretty amazing. Tragic, but amazing.

 

[Leo123]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Jackson's highly estimable low IQ was evident when, at her hearing, she could not answer the question 'what is a woman?' The woman is a loon and should not be a SCOTUS jurist.

 

[Oswald Was Innocent]

Federal judges have issued nationwide injunctions for decades.

Not in the massive multitude of times in an since Trump got elected. What they've done is unethical to the core and political.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Not in the massive multitude of times in an since Trump got elected. What they've done is unethical to the core and political.

Because Trump keeps breaking the law, shit-for-brains.

It's the responsibility of Federal judges to protect Trump's assault on the Constitution.

 

[Oswald Was Innocent]

Because Trump keeps breaking the law, shit-for-brains.

It's the responsibility of Federal judges to protect Trump's assault on the Constitution.

Trump broke no laws. If he did cite the specific statutes he violated in detail.

 

[IM2]

Jackson's highly estimable low IQ was evident when, at her hearing, she could not answer the question 'what is a woman?' The woman is a loon and should not be a SCOTUS jurist.

Why do stupid whites make these kinds of comments?

We've got a president who thought you could kill COVID by injecting UV Rays, said that the only reason we have high numbers of COVID is because we do more tests who also can't spell, but he's the smart guy according to dumb whites like you.

 

[IM2]

Trump broke no laws. If he did cite the statutes he violated specifically in detail.

Trump has broken all kinds of laws. Nobody has to cite the statutes to your dumb MAGAT ---.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Trump broke no laws. If he did cite the specific statutes he violated in detail.

He did.

I don't need to "cite" them, genius....the Federal judges who blocked Trump's lawlessness already did that.

You are a MAGA Nazi creating your own reality....no surprise there.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Why do stupid whites make these kinds of comments?

We've got a president who thought you could kill COVID by injecting UV Rays, said that the only reason we have high numbers of COVID is because we do more tests and can't spell, but he's the smart guy according to dumb whites like you.

Because they are racists.....which is why they love Trump in the first place.