Think Tank Report Concludes: Trump Would Raise Debt By $5.3 Trillion Over 10 (TEN) Years

[jc456]

Trump is proposing massive tax cuts and massive defense spending increases.

That is the standard issue GOP plan and it NEVER lowers the deficits.

he will get more tax payers paying in. you goofballs can't figure out 2 + 2 =4.

 

[Care4all]

none of us should even be arguing over this, even Donald's supporters...

tell your MAN, that $5 trillion is unacceptable....Squeeze him, he'll figure out how to spend less.....

 

[jc456]

better than obummers. D'oh BTW, you have obumers 10 year average?

The 2009 deficit, which is actually a fiscal year starting in October of 2008 four months before Obama was even inaugurated, let alone able to make any policy,

was the high point of the deficits. Every year since then the deficit has been lower.

Trump is proposing to raise it.

We went through that with Bush after Clinton. Not a good plan.

so do you have bummers 10 year average? I mean, he can only cover eight years, but damn, let's see what obummer boys' is. ready set go!!!

His starting point was a one trillion dollar deficit.

what is it now?

Gee I don't know, read my posts. Like the ones you responded to.

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

 

[easyt65]

Again, Obama called $4 Trillion in 8 years ($2.5 trillion in 6 years) 'Un-Patriotic' ...then went on to add nearly $7 trillion in 4 years.

His 1st economic bill was the failed Stimulus, a piece of Lib legislation that cost nearly $1 trillion (in one shot ' nearly 1/3rd of what Bush spent over 6 years) and contained over 7,000 pieces of DNC-ONLY pork!

 

[NYcarbineer]

The 2009 deficit, which is actually a fiscal year starting in October of 2008 four months before Obama was even inaugurated, let alone able to make any policy,

was the high point of the deficits. Every year since then the deficit has been lower.

Trump is proposing to raise it.

We went through that with Bush after Clinton. Not a good plan.

so do you have bummers 10 year average? I mean, he can only cover eight years, but damn, let's see what obummer boys' is. ready set go!!!

His starting point was a one trillion dollar deficit.

what is it now?

Gee I don't know, read my posts. Like the ones you responded to.

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

The deficit is an annual number.

 

[SwimExpert]

Notice how the scumbag liberals destroy every ******* thing they touch... look at Democrat ran SHITHOLES, some ran by liberal ***** for over 100 yrs... THEY'RE LITERAL TRASH but it's Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooshs fault.. LMAO YOU ******* neanderthals are your own worst enemies.

Speaking of trash, who left you rotting on the stove? You're not even saying anything here, but you never do. This thread is about the potential effects of the plans Trump says he will implement. You don't even bother to address the subject. You're just ranting and raving like a lunatic. Beyond that, all you're doing is wasting electrons and oxygen isotopes.

 

[easyt65]

none of us should even be arguing over this, even Donald's supporters...

tell your MAN, that $5 trillion is unacceptable....Squeeze him, he'll figure out how to spend less.....

Just as soon as you tell Barry his nearly $7 trillion in 4 years was Bullshit!

But you are right, none of us should be arguing this, even Liberals, because THE LIBS IN THIS THINK TANK DID NOT EVEN USE ACTUAL NUMBERS TO CALCULATE TRUMP'S PROJECTED DEBT - THEY ADMITTEDLY MADE THEM UP!

Trump's 'projected' $5.3 trillion in new deficit over 10 years is admittedly falsely calculated while Barry's $6+ trillion in only 4 years is in the history book as actually having been added.

 

[jc456]

so do you have bummers 10 year average? I mean, he can only cover eight years, but damn, let's see what obummer boys' is. ready set go!!!

His starting point was a one trillion dollar deficit.

what is it now?

Gee I don't know, read my posts. Like the ones you responded to.

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

The deficit is an annual number.

$7,060,259,674,497.51--Federal Debt Up $7 Trillion Under Obama
"(CNSNews.com) - The total federal debt of the U.S. government has now increased more than $7 trillion during the slightly more than five and a half years Barack Obama has been president.

That is more than the debt increased under all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined, and it is more debt than was accumulated in the first 227 years of this nation's existence--from 1776 through 2003."

I was more worried about obummer.

 

[jc456]

Notice how the scumbag liberals destroy every ******* thing they touch... look at Democrat ran SHITHOLES, some ran by liberal ***** for over 100 yrs... THEY'RE LITERAL TRASH but it's Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooshs fault.. LMAO YOU ******* neanderthals are your own worst enemies.

Speaking of trash, who left you rotting on the stove? You're not even saying anything here, but you never do. This thread is about the potential effects of the plans Trump says he will implement. You don't even bother to address the subject. You're just ranting and raving like a lunatic. Beyond that, all you're doing is wasting electrons and oxygen isotopes.

it is? hmmmm,

 

[Al Azar]

It's time to move on, but out of the frying pan in to the fire is NOT the way to go!!!!

Agreed - the last Liberal President added nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. This Think Tank thinks Trump ($5 Trillion in 10 years) will even do better than Bush ($4 trillion in 8 years). No sense in letting another debt-exploding Lib have the reins. Vote Trump.

The Johnson administration was a long time ago.

 

[jc456]

It's time to move on, but out of the frying pan in to the fire is NOT the way to go!!!!

Agreed - the last Liberal President added nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. This Think Tank thinks Trump ($5 Trillion in 10 years) will even do better than Bush ($4 trillion in 8 years). No sense in letting another debt-exploding Lib have the reins. Vote Trump.

The Johnson administration was a long time ago.

it was wasn't it.

 

[easyt65]

The Johnson administration was a long time ago.

AND?

 

[jc456]

The Johnson administration was a long time ago.

AND?

exactly button.

 

[Al Azar]

His starting point was a one trillion dollar deficit.

what is it now?

Gee I don't know, read my posts. Like the ones you responded to.

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

The deficit is an annual number.

$7,060,259,674,497.51--Federal Debt Up $7 Trillion Under Obama
"(CNSNews.com) - The total federal debt of the U.S. government has now increased more than $7 trillion during the slightly more than five and a half years Barack Obama has been president.

That is more than the debt increased under all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined, and it is more debt than was accumulated in the first 227 years of this nation's existence--from 1776 through 2003."

I was more worried about obummer.

Notice how they quit counting at 2003. Talk about presenting only part of the story...

 

[jc456]

what is it now?

Gee I don't know, read my posts. Like the ones you responded to.

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

The deficit is an annual number.

$7,060,259,674,497.51--Federal Debt Up $7 Trillion Under Obama
"(CNSNews.com) - The total federal debt of the U.S. government has now increased more than $7 trillion during the slightly more than five and a half years Barack Obama has been president.

That is more than the debt increased under all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined, and it is more debt than was accumulated in the first 227 years of this nation's existence--from 1776 through 2003."

I was more worried about obummer.

Notice how they quit counting at 2003. Talk about presenting only part of the story...

well that was the cutoff year for the total. why is that so difficult for you? holy crap batman stupid is flying freely in here by you for sure.

 

[Al Azar]

It's time to move on, but out of the frying pan in to the fire is NOT the way to go!!!!

Agreed - the last Liberal President added nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. This Think Tank thinks Trump ($5 Trillion in 10 years) will even do better than Bush ($4 trillion in 8 years). No sense in letting another debt-exploding Lib have the reins. Vote Trump.

The Johnson administration was a long time ago.

it was wasn't it.

I'm not sure how relevant that last liberal president is to today's issues.

 

[Al Azar]

Gee I don't know, read my posts. Like the ones you responded to.

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

The deficit is an annual number.

$7,060,259,674,497.51--Federal Debt Up $7 Trillion Under Obama
"(CNSNews.com) - The total federal debt of the U.S. government has now increased more than $7 trillion during the slightly more than five and a half years Barack Obama has been president.

That is more than the debt increased under all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined, and it is more debt than was accumulated in the first 227 years of this nation's existence--from 1776 through 2003."

I was more worried about obummer.

Notice how they quit counting at 2003. Talk about presenting only part of the story...

well that was the cutoff year for the total. why is that so difficult for you? holy crap batman stupid is flying freely in here by you for sure.

Because cutting it off at the end of the Bush debacle would have negated the load of crap the writer was spoonfeeding the uncritical reader.

 

[jc456]

you didn't post what his total is. want me to post it?

The deficit is an annual number.

$7,060,259,674,497.51--Federal Debt Up $7 Trillion Under Obama
"(CNSNews.com) - The total federal debt of the U.S. government has now increased more than $7 trillion during the slightly more than five and a half years Barack Obama has been president.

That is more than the debt increased under all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined, and it is more debt than was accumulated in the first 227 years of this nation's existence--from 1776 through 2003."

I was more worried about obummer.

Notice how they quit counting at 2003. Talk about presenting only part of the story...

well that was the cutoff year for the total. why is that so difficult for you? holy crap batman stupid is flying freely in here by you for sure.

Because cutting it off at the end of the Bush debacle would have negated the load of crap the writer was spoonfeeding the uncritical reader.

it's obvious your stupid clouded up the meaning of the article. let me take a moment and have a .......................

 

[easyt65]

I'm not sure how relevant that last liberal president is to today's issues.

He is the architect of Liberal 'Economic Slavery' blacks are trapped in today.

'These uppity negores have something they have never had before - power behind their movement...we have to give them something, but not enough to make a difference...I will have those NI@@ERS voting 'Democrat' for the next 200 years!'
-- LBJ


...and so it continues.

 

[jc456]

It's time to move on, but out of the frying pan in to the fire is NOT the way to go!!!!

Agreed - the last Liberal President added nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. This Think Tank thinks Trump ($5 Trillion in 10 years) will even do better than Bush ($4 trillion in 8 years). No sense in letting another debt-exploding Lib have the reins. Vote Trump.

The Johnson administration was a long time ago.

it was wasn't it.

I'm not sure how relevant that last liberal president is to today's issues.

me either, I have no idea why you're talking about. Johnson is relevant how? excuse me while i.......................