"Every municipal and state Anti-Corruption Act creates common-sense ethics, conflict-of-interest, transparency, and campaign finance laws. State Acts create the opportunity for federal candidates from that state to campaign on the anti-corruption platform – accountable to their constituents, not special interests."
Here's how we fix corruption in America.
We Can Criminalize Corruption by Passing This Law.
It won't happen unless you have more political parties with more oversight and actual choice at the ballot box. FPTP just won't do that.
Proportional representation isn't practical in a nation as large as ours, there aren't enough seats to accommodate such a system. Each region is allotted a seat for representation. The only type of electoral reform that would be feasible to include smaller parties would be instant run off voting.
You can't pool seats, and give a reserved seat for a rural district to an urban district just so you can make a proportional rep. system scheme work, it would be unfair to the interests of both urban and rural voters.
On top of that, if you cared to watch the video, it clearly stated that the mechanism through which they have intended to accomplish this is through ballot initiative, they intend to by pass all parties. They recognize that all politicians, no matter the party, have no incentive to introduce these reforms. The law to end corruption needs to be passed directly by the people.
The only problem?
It still needs to be enforced by politicians and courts.
As we are seeing right now in the battle between the Deep State and the Public State, there has never been any guarantee that the politicians, the bureaucracy will ever enforce the laws or follow them. Or indeed that the fourth estate will honestly report truthfully about what is going on.
I totally disagree.
1) There aren't enough seats for a nation the size of the US.
Huh? That's like saying you can't use string to tie a parcel because string isn't long enough. How long is a piece of string? It's as long as you want it.
You can make PR have as many or as few Congressmen as you wish.
You could have one Congressman per 10 people, or per 1 million people. The reality is the US could keep the same number of Congressmen it has right now, with PR.
As for it wouldn't allow for smaller parties. I disagree again.
Germany is a large-ish country of about 80 million people. It has 6 parties in the Bundestag. They have a 5% cut off point. You don't make 5%, you don't get in parliament (unless you get a FPTP seat).
Personally I think it should be a little lower, 4% or 3%, but it works. You have a choice between traditional right, traditional left, center right, further right, further left and environmental left.
This is far, far more than the US has which is just two political parties.
In the US it might happen that coalitions happen between different groups to form one block of voting.
I'm not sure what you mean about pooling of seats.
Individuals get a vote. If a rural person in California votes for a party and a rural person in Wyoming votes for the same party, then their votes count.
Right now if you want to vote for a party in California but your district, or your state (in presidential) doesn't vote that way, your vote is wasted.
Yes, if I had bothered to watch the video. But I didn't. So....
Yes, they intend to bypass political parties. It won't work. The system is so controlling, it just won't work.