Exactly.
There is no "turning back" at this point, it's a matter of degree on how much this political separation is going to suck and who might win.
If the bed wetters do win, humanity is going to become an ant colony. Tightly confined, controlled and collectivized. Vacuous robotic shells of humanity terrified by the concept of individualism if the word is even spoken decades from now.
Otherwise we "win" only to face a continuous struggle against marxist dogma because we will not exterminate them all nor can we if we decided to be evil enough to try. No matter how large society is, or how small a group of people you can find. Even in just a room with two people, you can assume one will try and dominate the other. The other may acquiesce, subtly resist or fight back but there will always be an asshole to come in and replace the aggressor.
.
I am on board with you 100 percent in your sentiments on the outcome for us of a radical leftist totalitarian state
and I firmly stand with you on the shrinking island of those who would rather die on their feet than on their knees.
All of that being said, we should ask ourselves who
'We' really is. In the event of a nationwide outbreak of hostilities who would you choose to follow? From what I've seen these past two years there are many, many, many very popular personalities on the political right who identify as traditional, Christian, patriotic Americans, from elected politicians vocal on Twitter to You Tube gun rights personalities and many more. Who from this crowd would
you personally choose to follow or sign and fight with? Many of these types of so-called rightwing internet and political personalities are in it for the money, the power, the popularity—whatever. None of them are trained military leaders, at least none of them are trained to lead entire armies.
That is the question which shouts out loudest in my mind, at present. So many conservative patriots talk about
us and
them, but I suspect few ever give much thought to who exactly they would follow, who would lead them, and what they'd do if the celebrity personality they chose to follow turned out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing or simply incompetent.
Our founding documents are very fragile and sensitive and speak to highly specific parameters. Not just any old You Tube video star or former president could honor them or hold to their principals while trying to lead some kind of rebellion or insurrection.
THIS is a key and very serious problem I see with all the talk about civil war going on around the internet. People on both sides claim they're itching for a fight and yet no one can really say who they would follow or choose to lead them into battle. Further, what if hostilities broke out and there were
several conservative, patriot groups fighting for very different objectives?
What I see at the heart of all the civil war 2.0 rhetoric is the potential for certain, widespread, out of control chaos with dozens or scores or hundreds of small armed groups running around the countryside killing each other and lots of innocent Americans.
There is no George Washington equivalent waiting in the wings to lead in 2022.