I did note it. I am also an expert witness when it comes to firearms issues and have testified in Court many times across this nation of ours. He was pointing it at the dirt in front of the spray can user. It's obvious. Your claim is BS.
They Found Footage of A Deranged Racist ANTIFA Bastard Shooting Into The Crowd in Charlottesville
- Thread starter MarcATL
- Start date
I did note it. I am also an expert witness when it comes to firearms issues and have testified in Court many times across this nation of ours. He was pointing it at the dirt in front of the spray can user. It's obvious. Your claim is BS.
Shooting at the ground in front of a group of people seems pretty dangerous. If the bullet ricochets it might hit an innocent person. I don't know if it could be convincingly argued that the guy with the makeshift flame-thrower was seriously threatening anyone at the time the man shot; perhaps that will be the shooter's defense? Whatever the case, from what I read he's being charged with discharging a firearm within 1000 feet of a school.
It certainly "could", but it most likely can't. Based on the plants growing in that area the dirt is a loamy type which sucks bullets deep. That being said the asshat that pulled the trigger needs to be arrested for discharge of a firearm in public. That is a crime. He was not in fear for his life, so the shot was not justified.
EverCurious
Gold Member
~shrug~ "near a school" sounds like a misdemeanor, rather than a felony charge, a reasonable judge would probably just slap him on the wrist with some probation or a fine. A gun hater judge will probably ignore the fact that he was facing a flamethrower in hostile hands and throw the book at him - though if "near a school" is all they came up with, I'd say they don't have anything else that'll stick. We'll see what happens.
EverCurious
Gold Member
Shooting at the ground in front of a group of people seems pretty dangerous. If the bullet ricochets it might hit an innocent person. I don't know if it could be convincingly argued that the guy with the makeshift flame-thrower was seriously threatening anyone at the time the man shot; perhaps that will be the shooter's defense? Whatever the case, from what I read he's being charged with discharging a firearm within 1000 feet of a school.
It certainly "could", but it most likely can't. Based on the plants growing in that area the dirt is a loamy type which sucks bullets deep. That being said the asshat that pulled the trigger needs to be arrested for discharge of a firearm in public. That is a crime. He was not in fear for his life, so the shot was not justified.
~shrug~ I don't know the state/muni laws there. Up here you can shoot someone for threatening you (and no the discharge of weapons within city limits law does /not/ apply when you're defending yourself, your family, your friends, your property, your families property, or even your friends property when you're a guest, etc. Up here a typical judge would consider that situation as self defense and they'd probably be more likely to praise the guy for not shooting him than to admonish him for shooting the ground. Different country up here I suppose.
The only situation I can think of where the warning shot would be considered "in the wrong" is like... well up here you can shoot someone if they're like running from the cops (we're kind of vigilante in a way, but then not because we're heavy military and frankly chronically low on officers so it's kind of "expected" that you'll assist an officer, but it's not required or anything.) Anyway so it can get a bit fuzzy if you miss in the course of assisting the officers to take down a shooting or fleeing criminal. If your aims good then you get accolades from the public for helping out, but if you miss then there might be a "risk" fine or penalty for "discharge in city limits" or "reckless discharge" kind of laws. Generally speaking, the only reason we even have those laws up here is because it lets us tack more years on to criminal's sentences and thus keep them off the street longer, it's not something that would typically be applied to "everyone" - I suppose you could almost call it a "discriminatory" law in that it typically only applies to criminals vs folks who go out in the woods to practice shooting their guns or something. Then again, we have a crap ton more space and wild areas than most cities and we're a crap ton more used to guns than most urban yahoos. (We're at 70-75% carry in the city, 90% outside it...)
Political Junky
Gold Member
- May 27, 2009
- 25,793
- 3,996
- 280
Will he break down in tears like that other Nazi?
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,420
- 2,180
You mean he fired at the guy with a flamethrower? That would have been a justified killing.
Life sucks for ANTIFA douche bags.
Shooting at the ground in front of a group of people seems pretty dangerous. If the bullet ricochets it might hit an innocent person. I don't know if it could be convincingly argued that the guy with the makeshift flame-thrower was seriously threatening anyone at the time the man shot; perhaps that will be the shooter's defense? Whatever the case, from what I read he's being charged with discharging a firearm within 1000 feet of a school.
It certainly "could", but it most likely can't. Based on the plants growing in that area the dirt is a loamy type which sucks bullets deep. That being said the asshat that pulled the trigger needs to be arrested for discharge of a firearm in public. That is a crime. He was not in fear for his life, so the shot was not justified.
~shrug~ I don't know the state/muni laws there. Up here you can shoot someone for threatening you (and no the discharge of weapons within city limits law does /not/ apply when you're defending yourself, your family, your friends, your property, your families property, or even your friends property when you're a guest, etc. Up here a typical judge would consider that situation as self defense and they'd probably be more likely to praise the guy for not shooting him than to admonish him for shooting the ground. Different country up here I suppose.
The only situation I can think of where the warning shot would be considered "in the wrong" is like... well up here you can shoot someone if they're like running from the cops (we're kind of vigilante in a way, but then not because we're heavy military and frankly chronically low on officers so it's kind of "expected" that you'll assist an officer, but it's not required or anything.) Anyway so it can get a bit fuzzy if you miss in the course of assisting the officers to take down a shooting or fleeing criminal. If your aims good then you get accolades from the public for helping out, but if you miss then there might be a "risk" fine or penalty for "discharge in city limits" or "reckless discharge" kind of laws. Generally speaking, the only reason we even have those laws up here is because it lets us tack more years on to criminal's sentences and thus keep them off the street longer, it's not something that would typically be applied to "everyone" - I suppose you could almost call it a "discriminatory" law in that it typically only applies to criminals vs folks who go out in the woods to practice shooting their guns or something. Then again, we have a crap ton more space and wild areas than most cities and we're a crap ton more used to guns than most urban yahoos. (We're at 70-75% carry in the city, 90% outside it...)
I understand that the discharge laws don't apply in a self defense scenario. I also can see that no reasonable person would conclude that he was in any kind of fear for his person, or another. He was pissed at the asshat with the hairspray and wanted to scare him. That is an irresponsible discharge of a weapon. Period end of story.
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
One by one, these crazy alt right traitors are getting caught and charged.
If this really had anything to do with history, why were they yelling insults and threats to Jews and Blacks?
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #70
So can that be rectified er wut?
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Did you not watch Sassy's video?
The guy is clearly using a spray can as an improvised flame thrower.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Are you really this stupid? The video shows the guy using his n!gger rigged flame thrower.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
I'm comparing the VIDEO to the PICTURE
Two different old, angry, white supremacists.
WTF difference does it make?
The guy was trying to burn people.
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #74
Here's one of your friends, soon the aim will not be to the groin, it'll be to the head and it won't be rubber bullets it will be live rounds
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Here's one of your friends, soon the aim will not be to the groin, it'll be to the head
One of my all time favorite vids!!!
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #76
They don't watch videos or read articles, unless the videos and articles are approved from The Huffington Post, the Clown News Network, Daily Kos, Pink News, random Twitter losers who live with their parents etc.
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #77
Here's one of your friends, soon the aim will not be to the groin, it'll be to the head
One of my all time favorite vids!!!
Here's more of the human filth, this from when the Antifa vermin were violently attempting to stop Milo - who's a Homosexual and is Jewish - from speaking at the Berkeley thing.
^^^^ Look at the Antifa ****** holding TWO Communist Hammer and Sickle flags, you can see both insignias beginning at 44 seconds in the below video, later in the video the Antifa faggots get fired upon by the police from the balcony.
The ONLY good Commie is a dead Commie.
So many of the Antifa wear spectacles and look like they couldn't get fucked in a brothel, pathetic losers, it would be easy to round them up and put them in Special Camps and dispatch them.
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #78
Is this you with the improvised flame thrower? No, your type are Internet Keyboard Warriors posting from the basement, your type don't have the balls.
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #79
I'm comparing the VIDEO to the PICTURE
Two different old, angry, white supremacists.
Do you need to visit the optician or are you just a typical Black Racist moron?
This is what we refer to in the picture, I have highlighted it for you in Homo pink:
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #80
"Yes....antifa marxists needs to be militant.....marxists of the past murdered 100 million innocent men, women and children...so antifa has a lot of murdering to do to catch up with that number......"
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
If you are going to be the leader of a women's rights commission; you have to a real woman.- Started by TroglocratsRdumb
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Interesting column from a former NYPD officer
- Started by eagle7-31
- Replies: 1
-
The Democratic Party salaries should be redirected to pay TSA and all other government employees.- Started by MarathonMike
- Replies: 6
