There is no way congress would not have approved Matt Gaetz as AG.

[ElmerMudd]

There is no way congress would not have approved Matt Gaetz as AG.
The general public and most of congress did not have the information Trump had through the house ethics committee.
With the information released today, Gaetz paid thousands for sex including with a minor,spent thousands on drugs. He did drugs in his congressional office.

Trump knows the kind of person who should be AG.

Sessions and Barr didn't do everything Trump demanded so he fired him. Gaetz would have done everything Trump asked him. Maybe get Trump some young girls to party with.

Inside the Gaetz ethics report, a trove of new details alleging payments for sex and drug use

The House Ethics Committee’s long-awaited report into Rep. Matt Gaetz documents a trove of salacious allegations of misconduct, including sex with an underage girl, that tanked the Florida Republican’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.

apnews.com

 

[DGS49]

And yet, even though he did all this stuff...not a single indictment.

At least we have learned what the Democrats are good at: Slander.

 

[MarathonMike]

Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are going to be a dynamic duo. There will be some serious and much needed house cleaning in the DOJ and FBI.

 

[Oddball]

Not even the hacks at Mediaite buy the OP's chickenshit accusations....

Matt Gaetz Live-Tweets Response to Devastating Ethics Report: ‘This Is Clearly Not Prostitution’

Matt Gaetz issued his response to a House Ethics Committee report on his alleged sexual misconduct in the form of a series of tweets on Monday morning.

www.mediaite.com

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

And yet, even though he did all this stuff...not a single indictment.

At least we have learned what the Democrats are good at: Slander.

Slander? So in your opinion the only thing that matters is whether or not a conviction can be obtained, not the requirement for practicing law that requires you to adhere to certain ethical & moral standards?

Do you still practice?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Trump knows the kind of person who should be AG.

Someone who is a criminal and sex offender like Trump; someone as corrupt and dishonest as Trump; someone as unfit and as unqualified as Trump.

 

[Rambunctious]

There is no way congress would not have approved Matt Gaetz as AG.​

Right... because its the senate that approves presidential appointees for his cabinet or judges...

 

[WelfareQueen]

Someone who is a criminal and sex offender like Trump; someone as corrupt and dishonest as Trump; someone as unfit and as unqualified as Trump.

He's your President again Dim boi. Enjoy!

 

[ElmerMudd]

And yet, even though he did all this stuff...not a single indictment.

At least we have learned what the Democrats are good at: Slander.Do you know what Slander is?

Do you know the definition of slander?
If what is asserted is true it is not slander. The claims were found to be true by an investigation of the house ethics committee that is chaired by a Republican.
You are a pathetic excuse maker for some of the lowest slime involved in government.

noun​

1
: the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation

 

[ElmerMudd]

Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are going to be a dynamic duo. There will be some serious and much needed house cleaning in the DOJ and FBI.

I am anxious to see the results. Two unbiast people who will do a great job.
Their greatest qualification is they are some of the biggest Trump ass kissers around.
You are a pathetic Trump ass kisser, just like them. No spine, no morals, unable or scared to think for yourself.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Someone who is a criminal and sex offender like Trump; someone as corrupt and dishonest as Trump; someone as unfit and as unqualified as Trump.

So I have a close friend, may she rest in peace, who explained to me what the government looks for when doing a background check to determine if a top secret clearance can be granted. Among other things I remember her saying that they look for people who aren't in a situation where they might be persuaded or exploited more easily to reveal government secrets, sell information, commit crimes against the government or misuse the classified information they have access to. One thing that is a red flag to the government is a person who seems to be deeply in debt or has/had a drug habit that could be used to manipulate them.

So a person like Trump, who has been found liable for some type of sexual assault offense against another person, as well as an assortment of other offense AND a person like Gaetz who has been found to have committed certain offense but never had charges brought against him, is this a good thing in Trump's eyes or a bad thing?

I know I'm not asking this very well but what I'm wondering is if Trump sees other men who have been accused of these types of offenses of a sexual nature, as "one of the boys" or does he likely see him as someone he can influence or exploit?

 

[ElmerMudd]

There is no way congress would not have approved Matt Gaetz as AG.​

Right... because its the senate that approves presidential appointees for his cabinet or judges...

You are one smart dude. The Senate is part of congress.

So I have a close friend, may she rest in peace, who explained to me what the government looks for when doing a background check to determine if a top secret clearance can be granted. Among other things I remember her saying that they look for people who aren't in a situation where they might be persuaded or exploited more easily to reveal government secrets, sell information, commit crimes against the government or misuse the classified information they have access to. One thing that is a red flag to the government is a person who seems to be deeply in debt or has/had a drug habit that could be used to manipulate them.

So a person like Trump, who has been found liable for some type of sexual assault offense against another person, as well as an assortment of other offense AND a person like Gaetz who has been found to have committed certain offense but never had charges brought against him, is this a good thing in Trump's eyes or a bad thing?

I know I'm not asking this very well but what I'm wondering is if Trump sees other men who have been accused of these types of offenses of a sexual nature, as "one of the boys" or does he likely see him as someone he can influence or exploit?

I think, both. good post.

 

[frigidweirdo]

And yet, even though he did all this stuff...not a single indictment.

At least we have learned what the Democrats are good at: Slander.

Is it slander though?
Or are you just willing to support criminals?

 

[Auld Phart]

Someone who is a criminal and sex offender like Trump; someone as corrupt and dishonest as Trump; someone as unfit and as unqualified as Trump.

you're suggesting one of the clintons?

 

[jbrownson0831]

Someone who is a criminal and sex offender like Trump; someone as corrupt and dishonest as Trump; someone as unfit and as unqualified as Trump.

Facediaper, take off the mask and breathe some O2.....you get everything backwards.

 

[jbrownson0831]

So I have a close friend, may she rest in peace, who explained to me what the government looks for when doing a background check to determine if a top secret clearance can be granted. Among other things I remember her saying that they look for people who aren't in a situation where they might be persuaded or exploited more easily to reveal government secrets, sell information, commit crimes against the government or misuse the classified information they have access to. One thing that is a red flag to the government is a person who seems to be deeply in debt or has/had a drug habit that could be used to manipulate them.

So a person like Trump, who has been found liable for some type of sexual assault offense against another person, as well as an assortment of other offense AND a person like Gaetz who has been found to have committed certain offense but never had charges brought against him, is this a good thing in Trump's eyes or a bad thing?

I know I'm not asking this very well but what I'm wondering is if Trump sees other men who have been accused of these types of offenses of a sexual nature, as "one of the boys" or does he likely see him as someone he can influence or exploit?

Another TDS kookbot....

 

[Rambunctious]

You are one smart dude. The Senate is part of congress

When speaking of the function of the senate they are referred to as the senate not the house wise guy....

 

[ElmerMudd]

When speaking of the function of the senate they are referred to as the senate not the house wise guy....

The Seanate and the house are both part of congress, dumb guy.

 

[Rambunctious]

The Seanate and the house are both part of congress, dumb guy.

Not when speaking of presidential appointments... you are reaching too far...

 

[Oddball]

Someone who is a criminal and sex offender like Trump; someone as corrupt and dishonest as Trump; someone as unfit and as unqualified as Trump.