saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #21
No doubt. When you hear some of these accusations, it isn't even "he raped me!" One just claimed that he kissed her without her consent. This reeks of desperation and fame seeking.
Theories on Bill Cosby's New Found Infamy
- Thread starter saintmichaeldefendthem
- Start date
No doubt. When you hear some of these accusations, it isn't even "he raped me!" One just claimed that he kissed her without her consent. This reeks of desperation and fame seeking.
Yes, because the Hulk's wife really wants to slam the Coz. How about the Hulk slamming the Coz. You woman hating right wing loons are so frigin clueless....it is beyond sad.
How about Coz take these women to court? Nah....then the entire world wills see what a pervert he is. He will just be mum....
How about Coz take these women to court? Nah....then the entire world wills see what a pervert he is. He will just be mum....
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #23
Oh you mean because he's been known to vote Democrat? He's conservative because he tells black youth to reject the lies of liberalism that they're not responsible for their own failures.
Go ahead and prosecute them. I think they would all love to have their day in court. Then the Coz will have to say something other than, "please con't use that tape about me..."
SmarterThanTheAverageBear
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 29,410
- 4,281
- 280
- Banned
- #25
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #26
I have some questions for you, half-wit:
1. How do you sue women who remain anonymous?
2. Why are we forced to believe women or be labeled a "woman hater?" They never lie? Ever hear of Duke La Cross?
3. How is the decision not to sue an admission of guilt?
4. Since when are people guilty just based on an accusation?
5. When are you going to move out of your Mom's house?
The last question might be seized upon as irrelevant, but I'm sure I'm not the only one to wonder.
blackhawk
Diamond Member
Do you even realize what an idiot you sound like? Here is an idea for all you moronic left wing loons if a crime has been committed how about pressing charges and getting facts looking at evidence and following a little thing called innocent till proven guilty. As we have seen following the rule of law is difficult for some of you on the left but give it shot.
Oh they are no anonymous. They have been all over the TV. The COZ wants nothing to do with them. He even asked the NPR reporter to do away with his "silence" tape. I do expect there will be less women who are willing to follow him backstage now. I guess he can cancel his prescription to his knock out pills.
It will just continue to get worse for the poor man. Of course there are always the weak minded who never believe he could have hurt a fly.
I wll wait for the COZ to sue one of them. JUST ONE OF THEM! Go ahead COZ!
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #30
I found this rather interesting about the 2 BILL C's!
The Politics of Cosby, or Why the Liberal Protection Racket Failed to Protect THIS Bill C
Victor J. Massad
Why is it that people who have become symbols of decency in our culture are being systematically destroyed in their golden years? Perhaps they are living too long. A few years ago, Joe Paterno -- a man who was golden in the eyes of the American public -- died a disgraced man based on allegations having to do with his covering up the sexual peccadilloes of a subordinate. Today we are witnessing the systematic destruction of another formerly-golden icon, Bill Cosby, who by all accounts led a life that was far removed from his public image.
There is much voyeuristic pleasure to be gained from the personal testimonies of the many women Cosby either hooked-up with or raped, as the media is well-aware. For me, the lurid stories only serve to illuminate a bigger phenomenon that exposes the new "puritan left" and its use of sex as a tool to destroy reputations and advance its political agenda.
Whether Cosby actually drugged and then raped numerous women in the distant past is somewhat murky. Most of these women were drinkers and drug users, and all of them were parasites who attached themselves to the fame and glamour of Hollywood celebrities in the hope that some of it would spill over to them. In the 1970's and 80's it was pretty common to party with booze and 'Ludes then go fornicate like rabbits. And it is not unusual for women to have regrets afterwards.
The bottom line is that Cosby was a serial adulterer who took advantage of a lot of women and used booze and drugs to improve his chances. So what differentiates him from any frat boy on any college campus in this country? The fact that he is famous? No. The fact that he is black? Maybe. The fact that his name has come to be associated with all that is good and wholesome in the United States of America, and that he has been courageous enough to stand up to the "leaders" in the black community who do everything they can to retard upward mobility? That would be it.
Bill Cosby is a male Democrat serial adulterer. He is far from the first. Take Bill Clinton. Bill Cosby is accused of forcing himself on women. So was Bill Clinton. In both cases, the testaments from the women were compelling, cogent and credible. In Bill Clinton's case, the mainstream media went into overdrive to protect the man. They participated in a corrupt conspiracy with the Clinton political machine to trash his public accusers and silence those who had not yet gone public. Today, Clinton openly campaigns for candidates -- including women -- and is treated like a rock star in liberal circles.
One might conclude that what differentiates Cosby from Clinton is that Cosby is black. It is an easy accusation to make, and given the predilection of the American culture, easily salable. However, there are many cases of liberal black leaders getting a pass in the media for marital indiscretion. Martin Luther King's indiscretions are well-documented. Are we to believe that none of the women associated with King ended up in compromising positions after a night of boozing or pill popping? And what about the case of Cosby's foil in the black community: Jesse Jackson? His fathering a daughter out of wedlock is well-documented. There have been whispers among reporters for many years that there are numerous indiscretions in Jackson's past, and yet none of these reporters sought out Jackson's women for a story, even after the revelation of Jackson's daughter.
So why must Bill Cosby's reputation be trashed, even as Bill Clinton and Jesse Jackson are rehabilitated?
The answer seems obvious to this political observer. Although Cosby was a card-carrying, money-donating Democrat, his views were simply too socially conservative for the extreme left in that party to accept. He preached self-reliance and personal responsibility in a place where hopelessness and victimization are accepted as gospel truth. In the minds of his adversaries, Cosby was selling a myth, and the particular myth that Cosby was preaching -- that it is possible for an African-American to succeed on his own -- needs to be discredited at all costs. An entire political industrial complex has been built on the alternative hypothesis, and its survival in the face of a nation now tired of ethnically-driven excuses and complaints depends on Cosby's vision being discredited.
What better way to discredit the philosophy than to expose the hypocrisy of the man behind it? And so, Cosby's head was cut off and it is now being held out for the American public to gaze upon. And it is being done with so much skill that ISIS terrorists are no doubt looking on in admiration.
The question of what happens between men and women in private is psychologically complex and subject to differing interpretation based on perception. What a man might recall as a "fun night of getting high and getting it on" a woman might easily remember as a night she was taken advantage of, particularly if the night in question turned out to be a one night stand. By today's sensibilities, we defer to the woman's judgment. If she thinks it was rape, it was. Even if he thought she agreed beforehand. This has been taken to such a ludicrous extreme that there are actually pre-sex contracts that people can download and sign before they engage in short-term mutual bliss. Any sensible young man today should carry one folded-up in his pocket, right next to his condom. Either that, or stick with Skype sex, which is infinitely safer.
The only class of people exempt from these rules is powerful, liberal men. What better incentive to become one?
The Politics of Cosby, or Why the Liberal Protection Racket Failed to Protect THIS Bill C
Victor J. Massad
Why is it that people who have become symbols of decency in our culture are being systematically destroyed in their golden years? Perhaps they are living too long. A few years ago, Joe Paterno -- a man who was golden in the eyes of the American public -- died a disgraced man based on allegations having to do with his covering up the sexual peccadilloes of a subordinate. Today we are witnessing the systematic destruction of another formerly-golden icon, Bill Cosby, who by all accounts led a life that was far removed from his public image.
There is much voyeuristic pleasure to be gained from the personal testimonies of the many women Cosby either hooked-up with or raped, as the media is well-aware. For me, the lurid stories only serve to illuminate a bigger phenomenon that exposes the new "puritan left" and its use of sex as a tool to destroy reputations and advance its political agenda.
Whether Cosby actually drugged and then raped numerous women in the distant past is somewhat murky. Most of these women were drinkers and drug users, and all of them were parasites who attached themselves to the fame and glamour of Hollywood celebrities in the hope that some of it would spill over to them. In the 1970's and 80's it was pretty common to party with booze and 'Ludes then go fornicate like rabbits. And it is not unusual for women to have regrets afterwards.
The bottom line is that Cosby was a serial adulterer who took advantage of a lot of women and used booze and drugs to improve his chances. So what differentiates him from any frat boy on any college campus in this country? The fact that he is famous? No. The fact that he is black? Maybe. The fact that his name has come to be associated with all that is good and wholesome in the United States of America, and that he has been courageous enough to stand up to the "leaders" in the black community who do everything they can to retard upward mobility? That would be it.
Bill Cosby is a male Democrat serial adulterer. He is far from the first. Take Bill Clinton. Bill Cosby is accused of forcing himself on women. So was Bill Clinton. In both cases, the testaments from the women were compelling, cogent and credible. In Bill Clinton's case, the mainstream media went into overdrive to protect the man. They participated in a corrupt conspiracy with the Clinton political machine to trash his public accusers and silence those who had not yet gone public. Today, Clinton openly campaigns for candidates -- including women -- and is treated like a rock star in liberal circles.
One might conclude that what differentiates Cosby from Clinton is that Cosby is black. It is an easy accusation to make, and given the predilection of the American culture, easily salable. However, there are many cases of liberal black leaders getting a pass in the media for marital indiscretion. Martin Luther King's indiscretions are well-documented. Are we to believe that none of the women associated with King ended up in compromising positions after a night of boozing or pill popping? And what about the case of Cosby's foil in the black community: Jesse Jackson? His fathering a daughter out of wedlock is well-documented. There have been whispers among reporters for many years that there are numerous indiscretions in Jackson's past, and yet none of these reporters sought out Jackson's women for a story, even after the revelation of Jackson's daughter.
So why must Bill Cosby's reputation be trashed, even as Bill Clinton and Jesse Jackson are rehabilitated?
The answer seems obvious to this political observer. Although Cosby was a card-carrying, money-donating Democrat, his views were simply too socially conservative for the extreme left in that party to accept. He preached self-reliance and personal responsibility in a place where hopelessness and victimization are accepted as gospel truth. In the minds of his adversaries, Cosby was selling a myth, and the particular myth that Cosby was preaching -- that it is possible for an African-American to succeed on his own -- needs to be discredited at all costs. An entire political industrial complex has been built on the alternative hypothesis, and its survival in the face of a nation now tired of ethnically-driven excuses and complaints depends on Cosby's vision being discredited.
What better way to discredit the philosophy than to expose the hypocrisy of the man behind it? And so, Cosby's head was cut off and it is now being held out for the American public to gaze upon. And it is being done with so much skill that ISIS terrorists are no doubt looking on in admiration.
The question of what happens between men and women in private is psychologically complex and subject to differing interpretation based on perception. What a man might recall as a "fun night of getting high and getting it on" a woman might easily remember as a night she was taken advantage of, particularly if the night in question turned out to be a one night stand. By today's sensibilities, we defer to the woman's judgment. If she thinks it was rape, it was. Even if he thought she agreed beforehand. This has been taken to such a ludicrous extreme that there are actually pre-sex contracts that people can download and sign before they engage in short-term mutual bliss. Any sensible young man today should carry one folded-up in his pocket, right next to his condom. Either that, or stick with Skype sex, which is infinitely safer.
The only class of people exempt from these rules is powerful, liberal men. What better incentive to become one?
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #31
Some of them are still anonymous. Thanks for keeping up with the story...or not. Why don't you catch up so we can have a discussion on the facts?
blackhawk
Diamond Member
Why would he sue? What would he gain by doing so? Allegations are made against him involving rape and or sexual misconduct and in your mind the burden is on him to prove his innocence by suing you are one wacky far leftie.
blackhawk
Diamond Member
Since some here think the burden of proof is on the accused to prove their innocence should this man also be forced to prove his innocence instead of being considered innocent till proven guilty?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...7mbw21aKoRb38zzlg&sig2=a4w9-yNLmyrZDl47xMsvFA
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...7mbw21aKoRb38zzlg&sig2=a4w9-yNLmyrZDl47xMsvFA
Pop23
Gold Member
Standing ovations = toast these days?
Bill Cosby Gets Standing Ovation at Florida Theater - NBC News
Maybe if he was gay he'd get a picture on a postage stamp?
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
Pheonixops
Proud Liberal
Well, if they actually make a statement to the police regarding this situation and it's false, it's a crime. Bill Cosby does have a chance to go after them in a Civil case (Libel, slander, etc.) if their statements and accusations are proven false.
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #37
That's where we need to draw the distinction between criminal law and tort. In most ordinary cases, slander is a civil issue pursued by litigators. Besides, I truly believe what I said, that Bill Cosby is too old to really care. Righteous people care less about the court of public opinion than the impious and that becomes progressively even more true as they get older. Think about how George W. Bush weathered the most vicious lies and slander and slept like a baby and woke up every morning with a cheerful disposition. Even today it's clear he is travelling light. I think Bill Cosby travels light too.
SmarterThanTheAverageBear
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 29,410
- 4,281
- 280
- Banned
- #38
True, but I'm saying making such public statements without proof should be a crime.
I'm not saying that it would be a crime if Cosby weren't found guilty because of the vaguries of our jury system of law; but rather that it should be a crime to make such statements if they can't produce credible evidence that supports their claims.
Free speech shouldn't mean being able to willy nilly suggest someone is a criminal.
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #39
I don't think anyone has brought up the point that the statute of limitations has expired on all these alleged crimes.
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
Was the new Aytollah (The son) killed? Any political fallout- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 7
-
-
-
-
Lights goimg out on Starner as the Epstein affair engulfs him.- Started by Tommy Tainant
- Replies: 1
