The White House is giving inside information to Wall Street

For the dem simpletons and their shills.

If Trump informed certain people on Wall Street that a trade deal was going to happen prior to the opening today then that would be insider trading.

Informing Wall Street that a deal is in the works (no timeline) is just an effort to keep things calm.
How dare you spoil the NARRATIVE du jour??? :aargh:
 
Oooooo, I'd bet Nancy Pelosi is big-mad over this!!!!
:auiqs.jpg:
Poor SeaSwab.
I know cave woman is.............

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bought stocks hit hard by ...​

1745581950656.webp
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Apr 10, 2025 — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bought some high profile stocks last week as President Trump's tariffs caused traders to bail out.
 
Poor SeaSwab.
I know cave woman is.............

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bought stocks hit hard by ...

View attachment 1104164
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Apr 10, 2025 — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bought some high profile stocks last week as President Trump's tariffs caused traders to bail out.
Buying on the dip is what smart people do.....Hell, you don't even to be that smart.

Again, you are coming up zeros.....Which pretty much sums-up your existence.
 
The template is being followed to the letter. FOX reports that the White House is giving inside, proprietary information on the progress of trade talks with Wall Street executives.

This is not capitalism. This is corporatism.

I'm looking forward to the defense of this.

Fox Reporter Says the Trump White House Is Giving Wall Street Executives Inside Info on Tariff Negotiations

mrFNM3f.jpg

I see it as more of the white house trying to keep the watere calm by assuring these companies that a deal is imminent, however, let's say what you are alluding to is true. Then go ahead and investigate, but for goodness sake, investigate ALL OF THEM.

See, this is why I keep coming back to you being a lefty. You keep saying you're not, but then you keep throwing up threads like this, but I never see you put up threads like this about people on the left, who allegedly follow the same practice. Where is your thread calling for an investigation into pelosi?

I support there being accountability in the government, but good grief, it needs to be for everyone, not just those on the right.
 
See, this is why I keep coming back to you being a lefty.
I am a very proud and comfortable capitalist, and I want to preserve capitalism. I don't want our markets messed with, any more than they already are. And I saw it, from the inside, for 23+ years. What I'm seeing right now is unacceptable, and I will defend capitalism from both socialism and fascism.

I guess that makes me a lefty to MAGA nowadays.

Definitions are a funny thing.
 
Buying on the dip is what smart people do.....Hell, you don't even to be that smart.

Again, you are coming up zeros.....Which pretty much sums-up your existence.
That's insider trading you dumb-ass.
Martha Stewart went to prison for such shit.
 
Poor SeaSwab.
I know cave woman is.............

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bought stocks hit hard by ...

View attachment 1104164
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Apr 10, 2025 — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene bought some high profile stocks last week as President Trump's tariffs caused traders to bail out.

Yep...and then there is this:

 
I am a very proud and comfortable capitalist, and I want to preserve capitalism. I don't want our markets messed with, any more than they already are. And I saw it, from the inside, for 23+ years. What I'm seeing right now is unacceptable, and I will defend capitalism from both socialism and fascism.

I guess that makes me a lefty to MAGA nowadays.

Defintions are a funny thing.

Then why don't we ever see you making threads like this about the left?

And if I'm maga, then you're a lefty...
 
Then why don't we ever see you making threads like this about the left?

And if I'm maga, then you're a lefty...
Whatever you say. I'm done trying to explain the obvious.

And somehow you "missed" the zillion squabbles I've had with the Left here over the years, on the topics in the second link down in my sig.

Whatever you want.
 
15th post
Whatever you say. I'm done trying to explain the obvious.

And somehow you "missed" the zillion squabbles I've had with the Left here over the years, on the topics in the second link down in my sig.

Whatever you want.

I post from a phone so I'm not seeing anyone's signature. I can only go by the posts from you that I see and I can't recall seeing one, from you, critical of the left like this. I understand you don't like trump, and that's fine, Post all the threads about him you like, but when I see you ONLY post threads about one side, what else am I to think?
 
Whatever you say. I'm done trying to explain the obvious.

And somehow you "missed" the zillion squabbles I've had with the Left here over the years, on the topics in the second link down in my sig.

Whatever you want.

So I went and read through your second thread (you can see signatures if you put your phone in landscape mode). That was a very nice thread, you had some polite discussions, but the thread was really just about how to help the democrats become better...and lead to them winning more elections. Even in that thread, you were critical of the right, using names like "GQP". So in your thread of squabbles with the left, you were squabbling with the right.

What im talking about are threads like this, where you specifically attack people on the right for things you never attack people on the left. Hell, even I push back against my own party, that doesn't mean I'm on the left. I tend push back more against the left for their policies and practices. I typically see you spend more time pushing back against the right.

Again, you are "critical" of the left, but you frequently attack the right. That's why it's confusing when you say you are not a lefty, it nearly everything we see is an attack on the right.

I'll admit you typically are more even handed than most here, but your actions speak to something different than your words do.

Sorry if I misunderstand that, I can only go by what I can see. 🫤
 
The SEC can dole out a pretty serious fine if it finds violations of Reg FD. Not to mention what the board may do to you.
And yet - you keep ignoring the fact that this very information was/is available from a variety of news/trace organizations that pre-dates this article.
So how is this "secret" information if it is available for everyone to see??

You - AGAIN - are falling for Mac1958 parroting an article that he -ALSO - fell for.

And, even after you go and Google what I am saying, and see for yourself that Forbes and other sources published this info - BEFORE - the date of this article - will you stop believing it?
No - you won't. And neither will Mac.
 
The template is being followed to the letter. FOX reports that the White House is giving inside, proprietary information on the progress of trade talks with Wall Street executives.

This is not capitalism. This is corporatism.

I'm looking forward to the defense of this.

Fox Reporter Says the Trump White House Is Giving Wall Street Executives Inside Info on Tariff Negotiations

mrFNM3f.jpg
You say a FNC reporter reported this, but couldn't post the reporter saying this? You sir are a hack.
 
Back
Top Bottom