The Ukrainian crisis and the Munich Security Conference

Dissident

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
358
Reaction score
136
Points
178

The Ukrainian crisis and the Munich Security Conference

Last week, the annual Security Conference was held in the German city of Munich, with the participation of many of the world's leading politicians.

Of course, the Ukrainian crisis was discussed at this conference, as before, but I would first like to draw your attention to the fact that, at the very beginning of his speech at the conference, Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, reminded those present of another crisis, the crisis associated with the deployment of Soviet missiles in Cuba in 1962; see below the quote from the official website of the US State Department:​
… the Cuban Missile Crisis had brought the world to the brink of nuclear destruction. Even as World War II still burned fresh in the memory of Americans and Europeans alike, we found ourselves staring down the barrel of a new global catastrophe – one with the potential for a new kind of destruction, more apocalyptic and final than anything before in the history of mankind.​

In this article, I want to draw analogies between the aforementioned 1962 crisis and the present Ukrainian crisis. To do so, I will remind readers of the key moments of the 1962 situation.

In 1962, the Soviet Union - a sovereign state - deployed its missiles on the territory of the Republic of Cuba - also a sovereign state - with the consent of the Cuban government, and it was fully in accordance with international law.

However, the US government of the time believed that these missiles were too close to US territory and demanded that the USSR remove them from Cuba. To prevent the delivery of new missiles to Cuba, the Americans imposed a naval blockade of Cuba although this act violated international law, as a blockade can only be imposed on states at war with each other.

The situation quickly escalated, as the Soviet government, among other things, declared that the USSR could deploy its navy to ensure the passage of Soviet ships to Cuba. And the world indeed found itself, as Marco Rubio put it, "on the brink of nuclear destruction", averted only because the USSR ultimately agreed to remove its missiles from Cuba.

The situation that led to the Cuban Missile Crisis is very reminiscent of the state of affairs that developed in Ukraine before the start of the Russian military operation.

The Ukrainian government then, as before, stated that one of its main goals was joining NATO.

In the West, they are trying to connect this with entrance of the Crimea into Russia and the start of fighting in Donbass in the spring of 2014. However, back in January 2008, the then President, Prime Minister, and Speaker of the Parliament of Ukraine sent a joint appeal to NATO with a request to include Ukraine in the NATO Membership Action Program.

But as US President D. Trump said about this at the beginning of last year​
A big part of the problem is, Russia - for many, many years, long before Putin - said, 'You could never have NATO involved with Ukraine.' Now, they've said that. That's been, like, written in stone… Well, then Russia has somebody right on their doorstep, and I could understand their feelings about that.​

D. Trump said the same thing at the end of last year too:​
Uh, it was always, … long before Putin, uh, it was an understanding that Ukraine would not be going into NATO. This was long before Putin, in all fairness.​
 

The Munich Security Conference and the Ukrainian Crisis (Part 2)

The first part of this article examined the issue of the Ukrainian government's aspirations to join NATO as one of the main reasons for the Ukrainian crisis.
In the second part, I want to analyze some of the arguments Ukrainian President V. Zelenskyy made about these reasons in Munich.
Among other things, V. Zelensky stated there:​
Україна не обирала цю війну.​
Ukraine did not choose this war.

In my opinion, with this statement, V. Zelenskyy was trying to mislead foreign politicians who do not very well remember the events that took place in Ukraine exactly 12 years ago, that is, in February 2014.

Then, in Ukraine, as a result of the protest movement known as "Euromaidan," Viktor Yanukovych, the legally elected President of Ukraine, was removed from office; see my post dedicated to the 12th anniversary of the aforementioned events.

It should be noted that Ukrainian neo-Nazis took the most active part in the Euromaidan,
And after V. Yanukovych was removed from power, the new Ukrainian authorities released those neo-Nazis who were then in prison.
In particular, A. Biletsky was released. He had previously called on Ukrainians in one of his articles to wage a "crusade against subhumans led by Semites." It is important to note that A. Biletsky currently holds the position of commander of an army corps in Ukraine.

Due to the surge of nationalism and Nazism in Ukraine, residents of a number of territories (primarily Crimea and Donbass), which were then parts of Ukraine, decided to secede from that country on the basis of the right of nations to self-determination, guaranteed by the UN Charter.

However, in March 2021, the Ukrainian government began threatening with ”military measures aimed at the reintegration of Crimea” into Ukraine.
These threats were accompanied by large-scale deliveries of Western weapons to Ukraine, and therefore the Russian government decided to launch a military operation in Ukraine in February 2022.

I would also like to touch upon the constant attempts by Ukrainian and Western politicians to present this operation as something connected with personally Russian President Vladimir Putin.

For example, in his speech in Munich, V. Zelensky mentioned the Russian president’s name 16 times .

But in the first part of this article I cited statements by D. Trump, who repeatedly stated that, for example, the Russian government’s rejection of the Ukrainian leadership’s plans to join NATO had existed “long before Putin”. D. Trump also noted that he understands Russians' fears that NATO could appear right on their doorstep.

Therefore, attempts by Ukrainian and Western politicians to link the Ukrainian crisis with personally Vladimir Putin are unfounded.​
 
Last edited:
Ukraine is pretty much all back of the bus now.
you are wrong as usual

the reality :


 
Back
Top Bottom