The Trump Shooting: Unraveling The Actions Of The Two Local Snipers

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
24,710
Reaction score
49,122
Points
2,290
This guy has put a lot of effort into this.

And the Feds are foot dragging, big time. So, we have a right to believe this guy is more correct than many want to believe.


The Trump Shooting: Unraveling The Actions Of The Two Local Snipers

This investigation has been hamstrung by missing evidence and data that should have been available from the get-go.

Among the most crucial of possible story elements is the precise location and actions (or lack thereof) of the two local snipers who had responsibility for the overwatch position above the roof where Crooks took position.

Where were they? Did they abandon their posts? Why is the story so wildly different between their direct higher-ups and the PA State Police? Why hadn’t the Secret Service interviewed them as late as August 9th? Why do we still not know the name of the second sniper?

It’s frankly implausible to believe that any investigation could be so sloppily run by accident or even gross negligence or incompetence.

In this episode we resolve several important details such as establishing the fact that ESU sniper Greg Nicol was indeed not at his post between and , and we need to know why.

We also note that the four open windows in the overwatch building demand answers all on their own. Who opened them, and why? Were they manned? How can it be even remotely plausible to suggest, as Richard Goldinger did, that there was not way to view Crooks from any of those windows when that’s obviously not the case?

This is the heart of the case. Everything now rests on unraveling the means by which Crooks somehow managed to escape detection after he left the picnic table at (or depending on which source we are to believe), haul himself up on the roof at , and then remain completely undetected by the only LEO team that had the best post to detect and intercept him.


 
I take issue with the premise of the OP. That local snipers had responsibility for that roof.

The Go-Pro video worn by one of the local snipers showed that SS had responsibility for that roof, he recommended that someone should be posted there. If local snipers had that responsibility, it would have been covered.

The better questions are:
1. Who from the SS denied the offer of a drone from the local police? I want a name.
2. Who from the SS denied the offer of radios for the local and state police to stay in constant communication? I want a name
3. SS sniper team #1 could see Crooks moving around the roof as seen in the Copenhaver video, so why didn't they do something?
4. People in the stand behind Trump saw Crooks, and were yelling at the SS, but no one did anything.
5. Where are the results of the acoustic analysis to show if there was more than one shooter.
6. Is the FBI or NSA following up on the cell phone data showing Crooks' movements and contacts in the days before the shooting?
 
kyzr has some good questins.

Send them to the congressional committee staffer that will be putting the hearings together.
 
This guy has put a lot of effort into this.

And the Feds are foot dragging, big time. So, we have a right to believe this guy is more correct than many want to believe.


The Trump Shooting: Unraveling The Actions Of The Two Local Snipers
This investigation has been hamstrung by missing evidence and data that should have been available from the get-go.
Among the most crucial of possible story elements is the precise location and actions (or lack thereof) of the two local snipers who had responsibility for the overwatch position above the roof where Crooks took position.
Where were they? Did they abandon their posts? Why is the story so wildly different between their direct higher-ups and the PA State Police? Why hadn’t the Secret Service interviewed them as late as August 9th? Why do we still not know the name of the second sniper?
It’s frankly implausible to believe that any investigation could be so sloppily run by accident or even gross negligence or incompetence.
In this episode we resolve several important details such as establishing the fact that ESU sniper Greg Nicol was indeed not at his post between and , and we need to know why.
We also note that the four open windows in the overwatch building demand answers all on their own. Who opened them, and why? Were they manned? How can it be even remotely plausible to suggest, as Richard Goldinger did, that there was not way to view Crooks from any of those windows when that’s obviously not the case?
This is the heart of the case. Everything now rests on unraveling the means by which Crooks somehow managed to escape detection after he left the picnic table at (or depending on which source we are to believe), haul himself up on the roof at , and then remain completely undetected by the only LEO team that had the best post to detect and intercept him.



The important thing for all of us as voters, is not so much the actions of the local snipers. Suppose they were the world's biggest fuckups. What can we do about it, or what could we have done about it in advance?

What is important to all of us, is why they were not properly supervised, instructed and led, by the Secret Service Agent in charge at the scene? Why were they given sole responsibility to monitor a high-ground shooting position, well within range of even a gun without optics for a shooter with the most rudimentary skills?

The acting director of the Secret Service, bizarrely promoted after this collosal failure, has refused to even tell us the name of that Agent in Charge, becuase he is still running protection operations at presidential events. Plus he's "a friend of mine."

That's the scandal. If the police officers thought it was OK to come inside if it got hot on the roof, or avoid it due to it being "slanted," then the leadership on the ground did not impress upon them the importance of protecting Donald Trump.

Or maybe he did let them know exactly how important he thought protecting Donald Trump was.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom