The Three Stooges on the Supreme Court Vote for Unlimited Judicial Authority

Cassandro

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
23,336
Reaction score
12,523
Points
1,405
By a 6-3 vote SCOTUS has come to the obvious conclusion that Federal District Judges have jurisdiction over their own districts, but not others. Of course the Three Stooges (Kagen, Sotomayor and Jackson) voted against this decision. Do they also think that the governor of one state should be able to veto the actions of another state? Do these people have any judicial integrity?
 
By a 6-3 vote SCOTUS has come to the obvious conclusion that Federal District Judges have jurisdiction over their own districts, but not others. Of course the Three Stooges (Kagen, Sotomayor and Jackson) voted against this decision. Do they also think that the governor of one state should be able to veto the actions of another state? Do these people have any judicial integrity?
When have you ever observed a Democrat have integrity over the past 12 years?
 
When have you ever observed a Democrat have integrity over the past 12 years?

There have been fleeting moments, all rejected by the DNC.
  • Fetterman called for common sense in his party.
  • Tulsi Gabbard ran for office. Thrown out of party.
  • RFK Jr. ran for office. Thrown out of party.
 
By a 6-3 vote SCOTUS has come to the obvious conclusion that Federal District Judges have jurisdiction over their own districts, but not others. Of course the Three Stooges (Kagen, Sotomayor and Jackson) voted against this decision. Do they also think that the governor of one state should be able to veto the actions of another state? Do these people have any judicial integrity?
No matter that it's been decided the other way countless times, amiright?
 
No matter that it's been decided the other way countless times, amiright?
When these national injunctions were ordered sparingly in cases of major Constitutional issues, our judicial system could deal with them on a case-by-case Basis. When they were corrupted into a conspiracy to oppose Federal policy decisions, the Court needed to step in to stop this abuse of judicial authority.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom