The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event.

[JackOfNoTrades]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

2) Bullshit. He whipped em up and set em loose. Promising to join them..until he pussied out and went back to the Oval Office to watch, smile and gloat.
"We're going to walk down to the Capitol. And we're gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. And we're probably not going to be cheering, so much for some of them, because you'll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong,"
3) Ugh. You are perfect example of a true believer. This one isn't worth a response.
4) Pretty much. It probably also ended the political career aspirations of Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and if there was any justice in the world, that steaming pile of shit Mo Books would be shamed into resigning.

You're totally full of shit.

The Dims have ended the career prospects of all Republicans, moron. There will never be another fair election in this country.

Who are you trying to fool?

Then don't vote if you feel that way. Either way, sit down and shut up. You've done enough damage. The adults are back in charge.

"Don't vote" is your solution to the one party state? Is that the advice you have for Jews being dragged off to the gas ovens?

Thanks for proving you're an irredemial idiot.

Well, we have a two party system....and WTF?? You really need a nap.
As far as Republicans being relevant, that's all on them. They were the ones who enabled the abortion called Trump for five years.
If they're wondering why it went so horribly wrong, I don't care. They were warned. He should have never seen the bottom of the
escalator at Trump Tower. Now that he's metastasized in the party, there may be no getting him out as he enjoys a 90%+
popularity rating.

 

[jknowgood]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

 

[Crepitus]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

Crazy conspiracy theories are not facts.

Stop this crazy shit.

 

[bripat9643]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

2) Bullshit. He whipped em up and set em loose. Promising to join them..until he pussied out and went back to the Oval Office to watch, smile and gloat.
"We're going to walk down to the Capitol. And we're gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. And we're probably not going to be cheering, so much for some of them, because you'll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong,"
3) Ugh. You are perfect example of a true believer. This one isn't worth a response.
4) Pretty much. It probably also ended the political career aspirations of Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and if there was any justice in the world, that steaming pile of shit Mo Books would be shamed into resigning.

You're totally full of shit.

The Dims have ended the career prospects of all Republicans, moron. There will never be another fair election in this country.

Who are you trying to fool?

Then don't vote if you feel that way. Either way, sit down and shut up. You've done enough damage. The adults are back in charge.

"Don't vote" is your solution to the one party state? Is that the advice you have for Jews being dragged off to the gas ovens?

Thanks for proving you're an irredemial idiot.

Well, we have a two party system....and WTF?? You really need a nap.
As far as Republicans being relevant, that's all on them. They were the ones who enabled the abortion called Trump for five years.
If they're wondering why it went so horribly wrong, I don't care. They were warned. He should have never seen the bottom of the
escalator at Trump Tower. Now that he's metastasized in the party, there may be no getting him out as he enjoys a 90%+
popularity rating.

Do you actually believe I give a damn about the sleazy pointless drivel you're spewing?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

The only thing more reprehensible than Trump thugs and criminals attacking American democracy are Trump supporters lying about and trying to ‘justify’ the right’s attack on American democracy.

 

[bripat9643]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

I don't recall the prog morons calling that an "insurrection." thanks for posting that. I thought there was a leftwing protest in DC where the progas went wild and made Jan 7 look like a bunch of cubscouts.

 

[BluesLegend]

A small fraction of dipshits got carried away, that's all that happened. These snowflake politicians are blowing it all out of proportion.

 

[bripat9643]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

The only thing more reprehensible than Trump thugs and criminals attacking American democracy are Trump supporters lying about and trying to ‘justify’ the right’s attack on American democracy.

Who are these thugs attacking American democracy?

 

[bripat9643]

A small fraction of dipshits got carried away, that's all that happened. These snowflake politicians are blowing it all out of proportion.

They know exactly what they are doing. They're praying on the ignorant who don't inform themselves about Dim's totalitarian treachery.

 

[bripat9643]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

Crazy conspiracy theories are not facts.

Stop this crazy shit.

Everything in the article is a fact, shit for brains.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy and a red herring fallacy.

That you’re a rightwing coward trying to deflect from conservative lawlessness, violence, and treason is understandable, however craven.

 

[bripat9643]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

No one was trying to overthrow the US government, you fucking moron. A few of the dumber protestors got carried away after the capitol police allowed them into the building.

Mere words can't describe what a douchebag you are.

 

[bripat9643]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy and a red herring fallacy.

That you’re a rightwing coward trying to deflect from conservative lawlessness, violence, and treason is understandable, however craven.

How is it a false comparison or red herring?

Conservative lawlessness? Were these people conservatives?

Every time you defend your filthy agenda all you do is reveal yourself to be an idiot.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

No one was trying to overthrow the US government, you fucking moron. A few of the dumber protestors got carried away after the capitol police allowed them into the building.

Mere words can't describe what a douchebag you are.

Stop excusing treason. Those assholes should have been hit with the same kind of force that the BLM protesters were hit with. Slight double standard here.
Yes, they were insurrectionists. Nothing you can put up for justification can change that. I have no problem with criminal charges and personal repercussions for ANYONE who
was videoed in or around the Capitol on Wednesday. No matter how long it takes.

 

[bripat9643]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

No one was trying to overthrow the US government, you fucking moron. A few of the dumber protestors got carried away after the capitol police allowed them into the building.

Mere words can't describe what a douchebag you are.

Stop excusing treason. Those assholes should have been hit with the same kind of force that the BLM protesters were hit with. Slight double standard here.
Yes, they were insurrectionists. Nothing you can put up for justification can change that. I have no problem with criminal charges and personal repercussions for ANYONE who
was videoed in or around the Capitol on Wednesday. No matter how long it takes.

Stop posting to me, asshole. I have no interest in anything you have to say.

Normally I don't put people on ignore, but I'm considering it in your case.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

No one was trying to overthrow the US government, you fucking moron. A few of the dumber protestors got carried away after the capitol police allowed them into the building.

Mere words can't describe what a douchebag you are.

Stop excusing treason. Those assholes should have been hit with the same kind of force that the BLM protesters were hit with. Slight double standard here.
Yes, they were insurrectionists. Nothing you can put up for justification can change that. I have no problem with criminal charges and personal repercussions for ANYONE who
was videoed in or around the Capitol on Wednesday. No matter how long it takes.

Stop posting to me, asshole. I have no interest in anything you have to say.

Normally I don't put people on ignore, but I'm considering it in your case.

Means nothing to me. I'll continue to call you out on your bullshit. If you don't like it..tough. It's a message board. Anyone who puts anyone on Ignore on an Internet message board is a coward.

 

[bripat9643]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

No one was trying to overthrow the US government, you fucking moron. A few of the dumber protestors got carried away after the capitol police allowed them into the building.

Mere words can't describe what a douchebag you are.

Stop excusing treason. Those assholes should have been hit with the same kind of force that the BLM protesters were hit with. Slight double standard here.
Yes, they were insurrectionists. Nothing you can put up for justification can change that. I have no problem with criminal charges and personal repercussions for ANYONE who
was videoed in or around the Capitol on Wednesday. No matter how long it takes.

Stop posting to me, asshole. I have no interest in anything you have to say.

Normally I don't put people on ignore, but I'm considering it in your case.

Means nothing to me. I'll continue to call you out on your bullshit. If you don't like it..tough. It's a message board. Anyone who puts anyone on Ignore on an Internet message board is a coward.

Welcome to ignore.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

1) Yes it was stormed. Yes it looks like some police let them in, but there were other police who recognized that they were outnumbered..greatly. Then, there were the ones that beat their way in. Here's a small snippet.
View attachment 440155

You really need to stop with this bullshit. It was an insurrection. Period.

"They beat their way in there" with a couple of flag poles? No one broke though those doors. It would take an armored car to break through them.

There was no "insurrection." turds like you are claiming there was so you can impose the police state. It's time for traitors like you to be put in prison.

Who are you trying to kid?

I wont' stop until the last SJW is put in a reeducation camp.

View attachment 440164
Libtards actually preforming terrorist acts when they tried to breach the Whitehouse last summer.

Again, were any of these people attempting to storm the Capitol with the intention of overthrowing the United States government?
Were they attempting to interrupt a Constitutional process with the intent of overturning a free and fair election?
No?...anything? None of those protesters had a prayer of getting anywhere near Trump. I don't think any of them even made it over
the fence. People don't realize how far it is from that fence to actual door to the West Wing. It's a long way. Lots of ground
to be taken down over. No comparison here. I don't care if Trump retreated to his bunker. That's up to the Secret Service. It did seem
like a bit over the top of drama given the fact that he was never in any danger...unlike those Representatives and Senators. They had an
angry mob barely a dozen yards away from them. Tell me, why do people carry zip ties at a peaceful protest....erm...riot.

No one was trying to overthrow the US government, you fucking moron. A few of the dumber protestors got carried away after the capitol police allowed them into the building.

Mere words can't describe what a douchebag you are.

Stop excusing treason. Those assholes should have been hit with the same kind of force that the BLM protesters were hit with. Slight double standard here.
Yes, they were insurrectionists. Nothing you can put up for justification can change that. I have no problem with criminal charges and personal repercussions for ANYONE who
was videoed in or around the Capitol on Wednesday. No matter how long it takes.

Stop posting to me, asshole. I have no interest in anything you have to say.

Normally I don't put people on ignore, but I'm considering it in your case.

Means nothing to me. I'll continue to call you out on your bullshit. If you don't like it..tough. It's a message board. Anyone who puts anyone on Ignore on an Internet message board is a coward.

Welcome to ignore.

I just want to see how it works.

 

[Crepitus]

If you imagine the left had nothing to with the events that occurred in DC, think again.

“The Storming of the Capitol”: The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event​

Not one single part of this story is true. …​

1. There was no “storming”. Rather videos show police opening barriers to let the “rioters” in.​

In the entrance hall, the “violent thugs” respected the velvet ropes and kept in orderly lines, took a few selfies with the cops, posed for the press and — when the main events were over — they were quietly allowed to leave.​

Compare and contrast the police’s treatment of those people inside the capitol, with their later treatment of protesters breaking curfew on the streets.​

2. There was no “incitement”. All of Trump’s social media posts on the subject instructed people to “go home” “with peace and love”.​

​

​

​

​

Is that inciting violence?​

Twitter and Facebook took the totally unprecedented step of completely removing those posts, and blocked him posting any further. They claimed to be preventing further violence, but it looks more like they concealed Trump’s denunciations of violence.​

3. There was no violence. Indeed whether or not Trump “incited” anything is moot, because there was no violence. Disregard the reports of chemical weapons, pipe bombs or IEDs — none of which ever appeared. None of the “rioters” are as yet shown to have hurt anyone.​

The only person reportedly killed or injured was a protester allegedly shot by the police. Compare and contrast the attitude of the media to this “violence”, vs the “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests all last summer.​

4. The riot ended Trump’s presidency. Although the Congressional session was widely described in the press as the “confirmation vote” for Joe Biden’s election victory, it was actually rather more than that.​

VP Mike Pence was chairing a joint-session which intended to allow full speeches from those opposing the election and maintaining there had been fraud.​

The violence brought this session to an end prematurely, totally undermined Trump’s legal and procedural challenges and killed any chance he had of overturning the electoral college vote. No sooner was the “attack” over, than many of the Republicans in both houses who were planning to oppose Biden’s election backed-down.​

More than that, it seems Trump’s “incitement” of the rioters means he may well be removed from office by enforcement of the 25th amendment, which would end not just this term, but make it illegal for him to run again in the future.​

Facebook and Twitter have outright banned him from posting. The press and television pundits are openly accusing him of treason and sedition.​

So, who has really benefitted from the “chaos at the Capitol”? Because it surely isn’t Donald Trump.​

One should always be wary of any event which “accidentally” achieves the exact opposite of its stated or apparent intent. …​

Some prominent voices are calling for all lawmakers backing Trump to be expelled from office. The Washington Post claimed “seditious Republicans must be held accountable”.​

The anti-social media campaign has begun again in earnest too, with Parler and GAB already being blamed for allowing “violent language” on their platforms.​

As Twitter and Facebook limit discussion, alternative platforms will be shutdown. Enforcing a corporate monopoly that cooperates with the state…the very definition of fascism.​

All this in the name of protecting the nation from “neo-nazi thugs” or “white supremacists” or other phantom threats. In the name of “protecting the constitution”, they are tearing it to pieces. In the name of “preventing a coup”, they are carrying one out in front of our eyes.​

Crazy conspiracy theories are not facts.

Stop this crazy shit.

Everything in the article is a fact, shit for brains.

Nope.

You wouldn't recognize a fact if I wrapped one around a wet fish and slapped you with it.