You don't have to. Move to Venezuela. No rich people going to mess with you there. Of course, no jobs, no food, no electricity, but hey, no one is screwing you over.
By all means, if you hate our system so much, go live under another system, and tell us how much better it is.
That's a Rush Limbaugh answer.
Hyperbole is a poor smokescreen with which to conceal chicanery.
People made lots of money before Reagan.
Yeah, and I know I'm right, and you can't deny it. That's why all you can do is "Well that is a Rush Limbaugh answer".
Hyperbole is a smoke screen, and so is deflection.
The only difference is, I'm confronting the claim head on, and I do mean it. Go to Venezuela. There are no rich people there anymore (unless in government), and all the major corporations have left. By the claims here, that should mean Venezuela is a Utopia.
There is no country, around this world, and throughout history, which has been hostile to the rich, the wealth, the job makers, and wealth producers, that has had a positive and prosperous result, by driving out the wealthy.
If you think the rich are screwing over the lower and middle class.... then show me an example of any country where they drove out the rich, and had a good result. Where is it? Where is the workers paradise?
Yes, people made tons of money before Reagan, and there were tons and tons of wealthy people before Reagan.
And quiet frankly, there is absolutely no evidence from anywhere, that show people are worse off today, than before Reagan. Haven't met a person yet who lived through the 1970s, that suggest we should go back there. Nor have I met anyone that suggested the 1980s were worse.... unless they didn't live through it. Pretty easy to claim the 80s were bad, when you grew up in the 1990s.
Who us hostile towards rich people.
Most of my friends are quite wealthy.
I'm talking about sheer greed and excess and the legalized gambling casino called the Stock Market.
There is nothing about the stock market that is 'gambling'. It's not comparable in any way.
Stop being ridiculous. Gambling by it's nature, is a net loser. Your odds of coming out ahead are always far negative. If it wasn't, then no one would ever open a casino.
Your chances of losing playing the lottery, are 258,890,850 to 258,890,851.
If you think buying stocks, has the same inherently negative chances, then you are crazy.
View attachment 89296
Does that look like a consistent losing streak to you?
If you buy stocks, and just hold them.... and just keep them.... over the past 100 years, the value of that stock would have increased 1,000 fold. And that's buying the stock, before the Great Depression.
Heck I wish I had been smart enough to invest when I was in high school, working at McDonalds. When I was working there, I could have purchased McDonald's stock at $20 a share. Today, it's up near $130 a share. I could have $100,000 in stock by now. Unfortunately I as stupid left-tard in High school, and still believed "the big evil companies hold us down"... so now I'm just getting my investments up. Left-tardian thought, keeps people poor. I cite my own experiences as proof.
And by the way, this graph, is just the increase in the value of the stock you buy.
Even if that graph was completely flat, and McDonald's stock had remained at $20 a share for the last 30 years.....
It doesn't include dividends. You own part of the company, whose stock you buy. As a part owner, you are entitled to a sliver of the profits. McDonald's has paid out 50¢ to a dollar per share, since the 2000s. You own a couple hundred shares, that's hundreds of dollars in growth every year.
So even if the value of the individual shares never changed, you would still grow your investment over time.
How is this..... ANYTHING LIKE.... gambling? Name one single way, this is like gambling?