The Democrat talking point is that Walz retired in May 2005 before his unit got orders to mobilize in July 2005.
Some of us are aware NG units find out several months before that they are going to deploy so people can get their life together. Walz knew in February 2005. How do we know? His own congressional campaign website.
The Democrat talking point is that Walz retired in May 2005 before his unit got orders to mobilize in July 2005.
All or part of Walz' battalion COULD BE deployed within the next TWO years?
The prog arrow is in reverse for Walz.
The Democrat talking point is that Walz retired in May 2005 before his unit got orders to mobilize in July 2005.
Some of us are aware NG units find out several months before that they are going to deploy so people can get their life together. Walz knew in February 2005. How do we know? His own congressional campaign website.
You're a very sick person. Weirder than the others.
He heard the word "deployed" and bailed on his men. His men are not happy that he bailed on them. His "stolen valor" is regarding his retirement rank. "Command Sergeant Major" was busted to "Master Sergeant" because he bailed.
Even when you put in 24 years and being in your 40's?
Weird you think betraying troops is a good thing
They were notified of the actual deployment specific orders in July, and they deployed/mobilized in OCTOBER...
The Democrat talking point is that Walz retired in May 2005 before his unit got orders to mobilize in July 2005.
Some of us are aware NG units find out several months before that they are going to deploy so people can get their life together. Walz knew in February 2005. How do we know? His own congressional campaign website.
Weird that you don't.
How is not going to ceremony due weather the same as tampon timmy betraying his troops and quiting?
Do you have any evidence to actually refute the linked article?
Such bs. LOL
The other leaders made it just fine.
FAKE 'news".
