The Senate Receives (of course) more allegations against Pete Hegseth. BREAKING NEWS!

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Nov 25, 2021
17,884
14,967
2,288
Texas


It's from his ex-wife's sister. Not exactly a man bites dog story.

This past weekend, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee sent the ex-wife's sister a letter asking for an allegation exactly like this.

The former sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth, submitted the affidavit in response to a Jan. 18 letter from Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., seeking “a statement attesting to your personal knowledge about Mr. Hegseth’s fitness to occupy this important position.”

Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, asked Danielle Hegseth to detail what she knew of “instances of abuse, or threats of abuse, perpetrated against any other person” and “mistreatment of a spouse, former spouse, or other members of his family,” among other requests.

She said in her affidavit that she had been assured that this would sway enough Senators to deny Hegseth confirmation.

Buried at the end of the video, the ex-wife herself denied this allegation: NBC's response was to question "why Samantha Hegseth (the ex-wife) signed that document."

Also buried at the bottom of the NBC website story.

In an email response Monday, Samantha Hegseth said: “First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.”

She added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer.”

Asked what information was not accurate and for comment on the affidavit, she replied on Tuesday: “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.”


Looks like she made it pretty clear why she signed the document in the document itself. I guess telejournalists lose their reading comprehension skills from blindly reciting whatever is on the TelePrompter.

The Democrats, including their operatives in the media, have no shame or common decency.
 


It's from his ex-wife's sister. Not exactly a man bites dog story.

This past weekend, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee sent the ex-wife's sister a letter asking for an allegation exactly like this.

The former sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth, submitted the affidavit in response to a Jan. 18 letter from Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., seeking “a statement attesting to your personal knowledge about Mr. Hegseth’s fitness to occupy this important position.”

Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, asked Danielle Hegseth to detail what she knew of “instances of abuse, or threats of abuse, perpetrated against any other person” and “mistreatment of a spouse, former spouse, or other members of his family,” among other requests.

She said in her affidavit that she had been assured that this would sway enough Senators to deny Hegseth confirmation.

Buried at the end of the video, the ex-wife herself denied this allegation: NBC's questioning "why Samantha Hegseth signed that document."

Also buried at the bottom of the NBC website story.

In an email response Monday, Samantha Hegseth said: “First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.”

She added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer.”

Asked what information was not accurate and for comment on the affidavit, she replied on Tuesday: “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.”


The Democrats, including their operatives in the media, have no shame or common decency.

The person presenting this shit should be indicted for lying to Congress.
 


It's from his ex-wife's sister. Not exactly a man bites dog story.

This past weekend, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee sent the ex-wife's sister a letter asking for an allegation exactly like this.

The former sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth, submitted the affidavit in response to a Jan. 18 letter from Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., seeking “a statement attesting to your personal knowledge about Mr. Hegseth’s fitness to occupy this important position.”

Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, asked Danielle Hegseth to detail what she knew of “instances of abuse, or threats of abuse, perpetrated against any other person” and “mistreatment of a spouse, former spouse, or other members of his family,” among other requests.

She said in her affidavit that she had been assured that this would sway enough Senators to deny Hegseth confirmation.

Buried at the end of the video, the ex-wife herself denied this allegation: NBC's response was to question "why Samantha Hegseth (the ex-wife) signed that document."

Also buried at the bottom of the NBC website story.

In an email response Monday, Samantha Hegseth said: “First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.”

She added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer.”

Asked what information was not accurate and for comment on the affidavit, she replied on Tuesday: “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.”


Looks like she made it pretty clear why she signed the document in the document itself. I guess telejournalists lose their reading comprehension skills from blindly reciting whatever is on the TelePrompter.

The Democrats, including their operatives in the media, have no shame or common decency.

It's amazing how Democrats have not learned their lessons and keep making the same mistakes over and over expecting different results. Which is the definition of insanity. TDS for sure!
 
It's amazing how Democrats have not learned their lessons and keep making the same mistakes over and over expecting different results. Which is the definition of insanity. TDS for sure!
chadyes.png
 


It's from his ex-wife's sister. Not exactly a man bites dog story.

This past weekend, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee sent the ex-wife's sister a letter asking for an allegation exactly like this.

The former sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth, submitted the affidavit in response to a Jan. 18 letter from Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., seeking “a statement attesting to your personal knowledge about Mr. Hegseth’s fitness to occupy this important position.”

Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, asked Danielle Hegseth to detail what she knew of “instances of abuse, or threats of abuse, perpetrated against any other person” and “mistreatment of a spouse, former spouse, or other members of his family,” among other requests.

She said in her affidavit that she had been assured that this would sway enough Senators to deny Hegseth confirmation.

Buried at the end of the video, the ex-wife herself denied this allegation: NBC's response was to question "why Samantha Hegseth (the ex-wife) signed that document."

Also buried at the bottom of the NBC website story.

In an email response Monday, Samantha Hegseth said: “First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.”

She added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer.”

Asked what information was not accurate and for comment on the affidavit, she replied on Tuesday: “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.”


Looks like she made it pretty clear why she signed the document in the document itself. I guess telejournalists lose their reading comprehension skills from blindly reciting whatever is on the TelePrompter.

The Democrats, including their operatives in the media, have no shame or common decency.

NBC is the worst. They don't even identify who this woman making these allegations is.
 
I got it on a good source that Pete doesn't properly separate his recyclables. Furthermore, sometimes he leaves the toilet seat up and forgets to flush.
 

Forum List

Back
Top