NewsVine_Mariyam
Diamond Member
Every time I read one of Ms. Dunn’s publications, I immediately think, “This is her best piece yet.” And every time, she proves me wrong. I love the way she hits upon so many critical elements within the subject matter and ties them all together with clarity and force.
It wasn’t until I first contemplated undergoing firearms training and getting licensed to carry myself that I learned gun control in America was originally implemented specifically to prevent Black people from taking up arms—particularly against the Klan—shortly after the Civil War. I was introduced to this history by those who supported my efforts to become armed as a means of protecting myself. One of the first resources shared with me was The Racist Roots of Gun Control by Clayton Cramer.
Only more recently did I begin to grasp the deeper implications of that history—not just how control over certain groups was enacted, but why. The motive behind the restriction of rights becomes crystal clear when viewed through the lens of fear. The fear of what full citizenship for Black Americans would mean—particularly the right to bear arms—was so profound that the Supreme Court gave it voice in one of the most infamously racist rulings in U.S. history: Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857).
The Court ruled that Black people were not citizens and therefore not entitled to constitutional protections. Chief Justice Roger Taney laid bare the real concern. If Black people were to be considered citizens, then:
Need more be said?
The Second Amendment for Thee, Not for Me – by Shari Dunn
It wasn’t until I first contemplated undergoing firearms training and getting licensed to carry myself that I learned gun control in America was originally implemented specifically to prevent Black people from taking up arms—particularly against the Klan—shortly after the Civil War. I was introduced to this history by those who supported my efforts to become armed as a means of protecting myself. One of the first resources shared with me was The Racist Roots of Gun Control by Clayton Cramer.
Only more recently did I begin to grasp the deeper implications of that history—not just how control over certain groups was enacted, but why. The motive behind the restriction of rights becomes crystal clear when viewed through the lens of fear. The fear of what full citizenship for Black Americans would mean—particularly the right to bear arms—was so profound that the Supreme Court gave it voice in one of the most infamously racist rulings in U.S. history: Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857).
The Court ruled that Black people were not citizens and therefore not entitled to constitutional protections. Chief Justice Roger Taney laid bare the real concern. If Black people were to be considered citizens, then:
“It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased…
…to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished;
…it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”
— Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
Need more be said?

