The Science Fraud

[zaangalewa]

Darwin and science didn't invent racism. The US had slavery long before his theory.

But not so Germany and Japan. And the US-American form of slavery is a very special form of "industrialized" or "capitalized" racism. The background for this racism had been the strength and endurance of the negroes. The "racism" = to see animals in human beings and to trade them like animals - had been psychologically useful for the purpose "harvesting cotton wool". The negroes had been seen as harvesting machines. The religion behind such a dehumanisation is per se an inhuman atheism.

 

[zaangalewa]

The US, long before Darwin, was a land that was not the US. America was a new land being exploited and colonialized by England and the Europeans, who brought slaves to the new world.

But they had no slaves on their own. Example: Slavery was forbidden in England - but not so in the colonies of England.

By the way: What you do in Guantanamo (and what you perhaps also [let] do in other torture prison in the world) hurts the laws of the USA in the USA - but not so in institutions of the USA which are not on the territory of the USA. This difference in justice is the main reason for me to call Guantanamo a concentration camp which has to be closed yesterday.

 

[zaangalewa]

Darwin and science didn't invent racism. The US had slavery long before his theory.

But science did also not prevent racism and helped nothing against the Nazis in Germany. A good example is Werner von Braun who was so fascinated from his physics that he did ignore everything else. I heard when he was old he was regretful for the crimes he did do when he had been a young scientist under the Nazis. God have mercy on his poor soul. On the other side he was perhaps the only one who really had been able with the technology of the 1960ies to send someone to the moon.

 

[zaangalewa]

I missed the part in your tedious cutting and pasting about the brutality and suffering that the religious institutions imposed on humanity with their wars of conquest and aggression.

The Catholic church never excommunicated Hitler.

In the time of Hitler it was always for everyone totally clear that the Catholic church never had been in the side of Hitler. The worst results in the last free elections in Germany in November 1932 teh NSDAP got in Berlin and the Catholic areas of Germany.

The Catholic church grudgingly paid millions in compensation to the thousands of boys abused by the sex trafficking syndicate run by the church leadership but there was hardly any acknowledgement of the damage they caused.

Please - if you do not know what you speak about - why do you try to do so? Do you know in only one case of child abuse in the Catholic church the very concrete story? Close your eyes. Do really try to find out what you really know - now! Without googling.
So why do you not know a concrete case of child absue in the Catholic church? Just simple because you never really was interested in this problems and what really very concrete did happen. If you would know such a concrete true story in details then you would be in very most cases a little perplexed and helpless.

As usual in your cutting and pasting, you try to connect a few sociopaths of the 20th Century socialist / Communist regimes with atheism and then try to connect atheism with the killing performed by those sociopaths. That theme appears in most of your cutting and pasting.

But it is true. He said for example the Chinese killed 40 millions. Indeed it had been up to 100 million Chinese of all religions who had been murdered under the fake-flag of "science" and the real flag atheism.

What you fail to understand is that the abuses by Mao, Lenin, etc were in furtherance of their political ideology

Exactly. And this ideology contained atheism and spoke about to be scientific.

and a function of their mental disorder.

What a nonsense. As well the Nazis and the Commies had no mental disorder. Even Hitler had been a totally normal human being in 1913 - and when Stalin suffered paranoia then he had suffered perhaps a totally "normal" paranoia after he had murdered millions.

On the other hand, the wars of conquest and aggression by Christianity were in furtherance of spreading the religion. South American Indian babies, heathens, were baptized by the Conquistadors and then had their heads smashed in.

Where from is this weird story? It had bene for example specuialy monks and priests who practically continously attacked the conquistadores because of their crimes in front of the king of Spain. The Franscxiscin üartelöyl baptized the Red Indians with water syringes because it gave them a little better chance not to have the rights of anijkals but to havwe tehn v ery little better rights of Christian beings. I guess in this time was the first time in history born the awareness of unalienable god given human rights.

Lovely!

The Crusades were about conquest and capture of territory.

The first crusade was as fight of the Seljuks who had conquered Jerusalem and Mekka and the Normans from France (Frankonians) who had conquered England.

Neither Lenin, Mao, Stalin, etc., used atheism as a rallying call.

They tried to wipe out all "primitive" religions that's why they murdered civilized and supported only the belief in atheism.

You priests and their conquest of young boys, however....

The what? --- Yea - you call all Catholic priests "gay" but you ignore on the other side your own hyper-tolerant gender ideology. Result: weirdness.

 

[zaangalewa]

"A man who is convinced of the truth of his religion is indeed never tolerant. At the least, he is to feel pity for the adherent of another religion but usually it does not stop there. The faithful adherent of a religion will try first of all to convince those that believe in another religion and usually he goes on to hatred if he is not successful. However, hatred then leads to persecution when the might of the majority is behind it. In the case of a Christian clergyman, the tragic-comical is found in this..." - Albert Einstein, Letter to Rabbi Solomon Goldman of Chicago's Anshe Emet Congregation, quoted in: "Einstein's God - Albert Einstein's Quest as a Scientist and as a Jew to Replace a Forsaken God" (1997)

It's interesting that you believe in Hitler - although he never said so as far as I know - what' on the other side also totally unimportant like anything else what Hitler said or not said. Joachim Fest had been the first who had been able to write a biography of Hitler. His father said about Hitler once during the time when Hitler still lived: "Hitler is such a good liar that even the opposite of his lies are lies again."

 

[zaangalewa]

As fas as I know did send Thomas Jefferson Christian missionaries to Red Indian tribes because he thought it is the only way to save them from their extinction.

 

[zaangalewa]

"A man who is convinced of the truth of his religion is indeed never tolerant. At the least, he is to feel pity for the adherent of another religion but usually it does not stop there. The faithful adherent of a religion will try first of all to convince those that believe in another religion and usually he goes on to hatred if he is not successful. However, hatred then leads to persecution when the might of the majority is behind it. In the case of a Christian clergyman, the tragic-comical is found in this..." - Albert Einstein, Letter to Rabbi Solomon Goldman of Chicago's Anshe Emet Congregation, quoted in: "Einstein's God - Albert Einstein's Quest as a Scientist and as a Jew to Replace a Forsaken God" (1997)

Albert! God is truth. And no one knows god because god is always new. So why do you say such an intolerant bullshit like "A man who is convinced of the truth of his religion is indeed never tolerant." Where had been your normal philosophical quality when you said so? ... if you said so ...

By the way: Best greetings - to Elsa and god. Hope you are happy.