Actually, as a professional resume writer, I can tell you this article is bullshit.
Here’s how the researchers (and their research assistants) conducted their study. First, they identified 108 Fortune 500 companies, with 125 entry-level jobs at each, and sent 8 fictitious resumes out for each (more or less; this would total to 108,000 but they only sent 83,000 applications altogether because some identified jobs were filled during the process). For each job, they sent four “black” and four “white” resumes; they also randomly varied the age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and political leaning of the imaginary applicants. They then measured the frequency with which the hiring employers contacted them, which was, on average, 24 percent.
Okay, so we are already deep into bullshit here. There is no way you can tell from a resume what the sexual orientation, gender identity or political leaning of an applicant is. As for age, the only way they can really guess your age is by finding what year you graduated College, assume it's at 22 and add that many years. Most sharp resume writers don't include graduation year if it older than 15 years.
Technically, there's no place for race, either, but the studies measured how often people with traditionally black names got called (Like Jamal or Lakeisha) vs. people with white names, like Greg or Emily.
In all of the above descriptions, however, I’ve skipped over how “race” is indicated in the resumes. Their method is not the same as their approach towards signaling sexual orientation or politics, that is, involvement in a “Black Students Association” or an “Irish Heritage Society.”
Sounds to me like he didn't understand how the studies were conducted at all. VERY FEW people list clubs they belong to, and generally, unless your resume writer was drunk, you don't include ones with a political, gender or racial/ethnic component.
Here's the thing, and you have to kind of understand how resumes are read. After the Applicant Tracking Software gets done sorting them, (And don't get me started on ATS Software), they are read by a real human in the HR department.
The HR Person looks at your name. He looks at your last job and title. He looks at the immediate pervious job and title. Then he skips down to check to see if your education is a match to the requirement.
If you put a club or an organization on the resume, it plain old didn't get read.
He concludes that people with typical black names like "Jamal" are rejected, but then wonders if redneck names would also be excluded...
What are those names? The “black” first names include: Aisha, Ebony, Keisha, Kenya, Lakeisha, Lashonda, Lawanda, Tamika, and Tomeka for women, and Antwan, Darnell, Jamal, Kareem, Marquis, Rasheed, Tremayne, and Tyrone for men.
The “white” first names included Allison, Amanda, Amy, Emily, Erin, Jennifer, Meredith, and Susan for women, and Adam, Brad, Geoffrey, Jason, Jeremy, Joshua, Nathan, Scott, and Todd for men.
Could researchers test stereotypically “redneck” or “white trash” names and see whether Brandy, Crystal, Daisy, Billy, Clyde, Earle, or Travis
Okay, that's an easy one. In my career, I've worked with a Brandi, a Clyde and a Travis. I have not worked with anyone with the above mentioned black names. In fact, the black people I've worked with - the few- have had white sounding names like Tracey and Cory.
So this is more of the same "Let's pretend obvious racism isn't there."