The Problem With The American Professional Political Class is That They Are All Liars

[Syriusly]

As to libtards of today that love Stalin, well we still have the New York Times that still showcases its Pulitzer prize for Walter Duranty who got that prize by defending and lying to cover up Stalins purges and mass starvation.l

Where does the New York Times- say in the last 50 years- praise Stalin?

Since you are exercising your usual lack of regard for the truth- I will cite the same Wikipedia article you have cited in the past- which shows exactly how much the Times has gone to defend Duranty

Calls for revocation of Pulitzer Prize, 1990–2003


The concern over Duranty's reporting on the famine in Soviet Ukraine led to a move to posthumously and symbolically strip him of the Pulitzer prize he received in 1932, although the Pulitzer was awarded for articles written the year before the famine started.


In response to Stalin's Apologist (1990), the critical biography by Sally J. Taylor, the New York Times assigned a member of its editorial board, Karl Meyer, to write a signed editorial about Duranty's work for the Times. In a scathing piece, Meyer said (24 June 1990) that Duranty's articles were "some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper." Duranty, Meyer said, had bet his career on Stalin's rise and "strove to preserve it by ignoring or excusing Stalin's crimes."[11] Four years earlier, in a review of Robert Conquest's The Harvest of Sorrow (1986), former Moscow bureau reporter Craig Whitney wrote that Duranty effectively ignored the famine until it was almost over.


In 2003, following an international campaign by the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Pulitzer Board began a renewed inquiry and the New York Times hired Mark von Hagen, professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review Duranty's work as a whole. Von Hagen found Duranty's reports to be unbalanced and uncritical, and that they far too often gave voice to Stalinist propaganda. In comments to the press he stated, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."[26] The Times sent von Hagen's report to the Pulitzer Board and left it to the Board to take whatever action they considered appropriate.[27] In a letter accompanying the report, New York Times publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. called Duranty's work "slovenly" and said it "should have been recognized for what it was by his editors and by his Pulitzer judges seven decades ago."

 

[Syriusly]

We have the 'Stalin Society' which is popular among socialists in the UK. Stalin Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Stalin Society is a British discussion group for individuals who see Joseph Stalin as a great Marxist-Leninist and wish to preserve his legacy, which they believe to be positive. The society originated as a consequence of the dissolution of the Soviet Union and what the members perceived as a subsequent increase in the criticism of Stalin.[1] According to the Stalin Society's website, "[t]he Stalin Society was formed in 1991 to defend Stalin and his work on the basis of fact and to refute capitalist, revisionist, opportunist and Trotskyist propaganda directed against him."[2] Kamal Majid, a founding member of the Stalin Society, is the vice-chair of the Stop the War Coalition.[3][4]"

Wow you are really reaching to find someone- ANYONE- anywhere- who has praised Stalin- from your own article

British journalist Johann Hari described a meeting of the society in a highly critical fashion in New Statesman of 10 June 2002. Hari wrote that a meeting of the society at which he attended consisted only "of around 30 people is primarily - as you might expect - elderly to the point of decrepitude" and that "for these people, Stalinism has become a habit they can't shake off" (although he noted there were a few young people). Hari compared the Stalin Society to the "Flat Earth Society, or Elvis fans who insist that The King is still alive." Finally, Hari criticized what he views as the society's complete dismissal of any criticism of Stalin.[14]

Clearly an influential group.......of elderly Marxists.....LOL......

The left wing equivalent of the Hitler admiring conservatives of Stormfront- but without the same kind of numbers.

 

[JimBowie1958]

As to libtards of today that love Stalin, well we still have the New York Times that still showcases its Pulitzer prize for Walter Duranty who got that prize by defending and lying to cover up Stalins purges and mass starvation.l

Where does the New York Times- say in the last 50 years- praise Stalin?

Since you are exercising your usual lack of regard for the truth- I will cite the same Wikipedia article you have cited in the past- which shows exactly how much the Times has gone to defend Duranty

Calls for revocation of Pulitzer Prize, 1990–2003


The concern over Duranty's reporting on the famine in Soviet Ukraine led to a move to posthumously and symbolically strip him of the Pulitzer prize he received in 1932, although the Pulitzer was awarded for articles written the year before the famine started.


In response to Stalin's Apologist (1990), the critical biography by Sally J. Taylor, the New York Times assigned a member of its editorial board, Karl Meyer, to write a signed editorial about Duranty's work for the Times. In a scathing piece, Meyer said (24 June 1990) that Duranty's articles were "some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper." Duranty, Meyer said, had bet his career on Stalin's rise and "strove to preserve it by ignoring or excusing Stalin's crimes."[11] Four years earlier, in a review of Robert Conquest's The Harvest of Sorrow (1986), former Moscow bureau reporter Craig Whitney wrote that Duranty effectively ignored the famine until it was almost over.


In 2003, following an international campaign by the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Pulitzer Board began a renewed inquiry and the New York Times hired Mark von Hagen, professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review Duranty's work as a whole. Von Hagen found Duranty's reports to be unbalanced and uncritical, and that they far too often gave voice to Stalinist propaganda. In comments to the press he stated, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."[26] The Times sent von Hagen's report to the Pulitzer Board and left it to the Board to take whatever action they considered appropriate.[27] In a letter accompanying the report, New York Times publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. called Duranty's work "slovenly" and said it "should have been recognized for what it was by his editors and by his Pulitzer judges seven decades ago."

All well and good for the 'Gray Lady' to do some CYA on the matter but she still showcases those reprehensible prizes won by Duranties lies.

They should ditch them in the basement and never speak of him again except in shame.

And regardless of that, it is still quite common for libtards to swoon over Castro and other tin horn dictators.

That shows where their heart truly is; the Dictatorship of the Proletariate and its derived fantasies of power.

Every Jacobin that defends the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution holds a special place in their hearts for Stalin whether they reveal it or not.

 

[Syriusly]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

 

[JimBowie1958]

We have the 'Stalin Society' which is popular among socialists in the UK. Stalin Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Stalin Society is a British discussion group for individuals who see Joseph Stalin as a great Marxist-Leninist and wish to preserve his legacy, which they believe to be positive. The society originated as a consequence of the dissolution of the Soviet Union and what the members perceived as a subsequent increase in the criticism of Stalin.[1] According to the Stalin Society's website, "[t]he Stalin Society was formed in 1991 to defend Stalin and his work on the basis of fact and to refute capitalist, revisionist, opportunist and Trotskyist propaganda directed against him."[2] Kamal Majid, a founding member of the Stalin Society, is the vice-chair of the Stop the War Coalition.[3][4]"

Wow you are really reaching to find someone- ANYONE- anywhere- who has praised Stalin- from your own article

British journalist Johann Hari described a meeting of the society in a highly critical fashion in New Statesman of 10 June 2002. Hari wrote that a meeting of the society at which he attended consisted only "of around 30 people is primarily - as you might expect - elderly to the point of decrepitude" and that "for these people, Stalinism has become a habit they can't shake off" (although he noted there were a few young people). Hari compared the Stalin Society to the "Flat Earth Society, or Elvis fans who insist that The King is still alive." Finally, Hari criticized what he views as the society's complete dismissal of any criticism of Stalin.[14]

Clearly an influential group.......of elderly Marxists.....LOL......

The left wing equivalent of the Hitler admiring conservatives of Stormfront- but without the same kind of numbers.

Libtards have never been the most numerous of liberals, but they always seem to end up running the show for liberals and speaking on their behalf.

 

[Syriusly]

Marxism has been dead for decades- that you are trying to keep it alive is pretty hilarious- as silly as your lies.

Lol, what bullshit you spew to hide what is today in plain sight; the Marxist dominance of our media and entertainment industries.

Feel free to show us how- since 'private ownership' is the exact opposite of Marxism.

 

[Syriusly]

We have the 'Stalin Society' which is popular among socialists in the UK. Stalin Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Stalin Society is a British discussion group for individuals who see Joseph Stalin as a great Marxist-Leninist and wish to preserve his legacy, which they believe to be positive. The society originated as a consequence of the dissolution of the Soviet Union and what the members perceived as a subsequent increase in the criticism of Stalin.[1] According to the Stalin Society's website, "[t]he Stalin Society was formed in 1991 to defend Stalin and his work on the basis of fact and to refute capitalist, revisionist, opportunist and Trotskyist propaganda directed against him."[2] Kamal Majid, a founding member of the Stalin Society, is the vice-chair of the Stop the War Coalition.[3][4]"

Wow you are really reaching to find someone- ANYONE- anywhere- who has praised Stalin- from your own article

British journalist Johann Hari described a meeting of the society in a highly critical fashion in New Statesman of 10 June 2002. Hari wrote that a meeting of the society at which he attended consisted only "of around 30 people is primarily - as you might expect - elderly to the point of decrepitude" and that "for these people, Stalinism has become a habit they can't shake off" (although he noted there were a few young people). Hari compared the Stalin Society to the "Flat Earth Society, or Elvis fans who insist that The King is still alive." Finally, Hari criticized what he views as the society's complete dismissal of any criticism of Stalin.[14]

Clearly an influential group.......of elderly Marxists.....LOL......

The left wing equivalent of the Hitler admiring conservatives of Stormfront- but without the same kind of numbers.

Libtards have never been the most numerous of liberals, but they always seem to end up running the show for liberals and speaking on their behalf.

Well we all know that your definition of 'libtard' is anyone who you disagree with.

 

[JimBowie1958]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

I have already shown you two groups that defend Stalin and Mahers repudiation of liberal admiration for Stalin.

I need do no more.

I do know that if a GOP candidate has a Kluxer or neoNazi working for him, he would purge that shit immediately, and yet Democrats seem to acclimate quite well to communists in their party and Mao Christmas ornaments in the White House.

 

[Syriusly]

Oh and lets not skip the most famous Marxist of all, our dear POTUS himself.

Obama Apologizes to Castro

Obama: Talks With Castro 'Candid and Fruitful'

Were Stalin also still alive OBama would be bowing and kissing his ass just like he did Castro

Poor Jimmie- still upset that Obama has opened relations with Communist Cuba.....and still suffering the heartbreak of Nixon opening relations with Communist China......

 

[JimBowie1958]

Marxism has been dead for decades- that you are trying to keep it alive is pretty hilarious- as silly as your lies.

Lol, what bullshit you spew to hide what is today in plain sight; the Marxist dominance of our media and entertainment industries.

Feel free to show us how- since 'private ownership' is the exact opposite of Marxism.

Private ownership under Marxism only comes completely gone after the success of the Dictatorship and the destruction of Capitalism everywhere.

In effect all communism makes a little room for property ownership.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Poor Jimmie- still upset that Obama has opened relations with Communist Cuba.....and still suffering the heartbreak of Nixon opening relations with Communist China......

lol, I am not upset.

Is that the only way you can support your claims by pretending I have said what I have not?

 

[Syriusly]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

I have already shown you two groups that defend Stalin and Mahers repudiation of liberal admiration for Stalin..

You have shown a single British organization that defends Stalin. And quoted an unsubstantiated claim by a political pundit.

So much for the 'defense of Stalin'- it is as widespread as the 'defense of the Flat Earth Theory'

 

[Syriusly]

Marxism has been dead for decades- that you are trying to keep it alive is pretty hilarious- as silly as your lies.

Lol, what bullshit you spew to hide what is today in plain sight; the Marxist dominance of our media and entertainment industries.

Feel free to show us how- since 'private ownership' is the exact opposite of Marxism.

Private ownership under Marxism only comes completely gone after the success of the Dictatorship and the destruction of Capitalism everywhere.

In effect all communism makes a little room for property ownership.

And meanwhile- media is still owned privately- and not by the government- still not Marxism.

 

[Syriusly]

Poor Jimmie- still upset that Obama has opened relations with Communist Cuba.....and still suffering the heartbreak of Nixon opening relations with Communist China......

lol, I am not upset.

Is that the only way you can support your claims by pretending I have said what I have not?

That is how you support your claims against me.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I'd do the opposite of loserterianism that wants to gut, slash and burn everything. It isn't wise or logical.

To many insane people wanting something that is very bad.

 

[daws101]

As to libtards of today that love Stalin, well we still have the New York Times that still showcases its Pulitzer prize for Walter Duranty who got that prize by defending and lying to cover up Stalins purges and mass starvation.l

Where does the New York Times- say in the last 50 years- praise Stalin?

Since you are exercising your usual lack of regard for the truth- I will cite the same Wikipedia article you have cited in the past- which shows exactly how much the Times has gone to defend Duranty

Calls for revocation of Pulitzer Prize, 1990–2003


The concern over Duranty's reporting on the famine in Soviet Ukraine led to a move to posthumously and symbolically strip him of the Pulitzer prize he received in 1932, although the Pulitzer was awarded for articles written the year before the famine started.


In response to Stalin's Apologist (1990), the critical biography by Sally J. Taylor, the New York Times assigned a member of its editorial board, Karl Meyer, to write a signed editorial about Duranty's work for the Times. In a scathing piece, Meyer said (24 June 1990) that Duranty's articles were "some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper." Duranty, Meyer said, had bet his career on Stalin's rise and "strove to preserve it by ignoring or excusing Stalin's crimes."[11] Four years earlier, in a review of Robert Conquest's The Harvest of Sorrow (1986), former Moscow bureau reporter Craig Whitney wrote that Duranty effectively ignored the famine until it was almost over.


In 2003, following an international campaign by the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Pulitzer Board began a renewed inquiry and the New York Times hired Mark von Hagen, professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review Duranty's work as a whole. Von Hagen found Duranty's reports to be unbalanced and uncritical, and that they far too often gave voice to Stalinist propaganda. In comments to the press he stated, "For the sake of The New York Times' honor, they should take the prize away."[26] The Times sent von Hagen's report to the Pulitzer Board and left it to the Board to take whatever action they considered appropriate.[27] In a letter accompanying the report, New York Times publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. called Duranty's work "slovenly" and said it "should have been recognized for what it was by his editors and by his Pulitzer judges seven decades ago."

All well and good for the 'Gray Lady' to do some CYA on the matter but she still showcases those reprehensible prizes won by Duranties lies.

They should ditch them in the basement and never speak of him again except in shame.

And regardless of that, it is still quite common for libtards to swoon over Castro and other tin horn dictators.

That shows where their heart truly is; the Dictatorship of the Proletariate and its derived fantasies of power.

Every Jacobin that defends the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution holds a special place in their hearts for Stalin whether they reveal it or not.

damn that's reaching . jimblowme is distraught his pants should spontaneously combust very soon.

 

[JimBowie1958]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

I have already shown you two groups that defend Stalin and Mahers repudiation of liberal admiration for Stalin..

You have shown a single British organization that defends Stalin. And quoted an unsubstantiated claim by a political pundit.

So much for the 'defense of Stalin'- it is as widespread as the 'defense of the Flat Earth Theory'

Lol, so think whatever you want, dear. I leave it to any lurkers here to decide for themselves what the truth of the matter is.

Stalin no better than Hitler? The debate goes on

Blair and his A-grade liars would shame Stalin

Average Joe: The Return of Stalin Apologists

Stalin Apologists Lingered on at the New York Times Long After Duranty

 

[daws101]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

I have already shown you two groups that defend Stalin and Mahers repudiation of liberal admiration for Stalin..

You have shown a single British organization that defends Stalin. And quoted an unsubstantiated claim by a political pundit.

So much for the 'defense of Stalin'- it is as widespread as the 'defense of the Flat Earth Theory'

Lol, so think whatever you want, dear. I leave it to any lurkers here to decide for themselves what the truth of the matter is.

Stalin no better than Hitler? The debate goes on

Blair and his A-grade liars would shame Stalin

Average Joe: The Return of Stalin Apologists

Stalin Apologists Lingered on at the New York Times Long After Duranty

does the term extreme bias mean anything to you?.
obsession ,zealotry, fixation, mania, compulsion ?

 

[Syriusly]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

I have already shown you two groups that defend Stalin and Mahers repudiation of liberal admiration for Stalin..

You have shown a single British organization that defends Stalin. And quoted an unsubstantiated claim by a political pundit.

So much for the 'defense of Stalin'- it is as widespread as the 'defense of the Flat Earth Theory'

Lol, so think whatever you want, dear. I leave it to any lurkers here to decide for themselves what the truth of the matter is.

Stalin no better than Hitler? The debate goes on

Blair and his A-grade liars would shame Stalin

Average Joe: The Return of Stalin Apologists

Stalin Apologists Lingered on at the New York Times Long After Duranty

Wow- you sure do want to talk up Stalin.....why exactly do you obsess about Stalin so much?

 

[daws101]

And look at how many libtards have sung the praises of Cstro, who admires Stalin and emulates the man.l

And so you have so failed to find anyone who actually praises Stalin- you have to no say that anyone who has praised Castro- is praising Stalin......

Why are the Right Wing Nut Jobs always so dishonest?

Is it just because they have so little honest material to work with?

I have already shown you two groups that defend Stalin and Mahers repudiation of liberal admiration for Stalin..

You have shown a single British organization that defends Stalin. And quoted an unsubstantiated claim by a political pundit.

So much for the 'defense of Stalin'- it is as widespread as the 'defense of the Flat Earth Theory'

Lol, so think whatever you want, dear. I leave it to any lurkers here to decide for themselves what the truth of the matter is.

Stalin no better than Hitler? The debate goes on

Blair and his A-grade liars would shame Stalin

Average Joe: The Return of Stalin Apologists

Stalin Apologists Lingered on at the New York Times Long After Duranty

Wow- you sure do want to talk up Stalin.....why exactly do you obsess about Stalin so much?

Gotta be the mustache!