www.gvpedia.org
Lately? its been 50 years and the court that folks have been "thoroughly disgusted with" has been flipped.
got a meaningless chart you don't understand to show us how and why?
uh, the entire purpose of the constitution is to prevent tyranny by majority...our majority is limited by our constitution so the majority cannot impose its will on the minority...You are not even constitutionally allowed to vote on constitutional law [ e.g. see porp.8 in Ca.] which is why white liberals are always trying to skirt the constitution...time you started respecting the constitution instead of pretending you understand it.
It seems that those who commit mass murders using AR 15's purchased legally, have no prior arrests and conviction of crimes. Thus, those "Criminals are the problem" are not the issue.
Of course. And most of them have never been a criminal - if a criminal is defined as someone who was arrested and convicted in any crime.
Indeed, even shameless bigots like you get to have your moments in the Sun. Thank goodness an adequately informed majority generally rules in the long run.
So much for your marriage only being between a man and a woman BS.
MYTH: A concealed handgun permit holder has never shot the wrong person during an attack - GVPedia
FACT: GVPedia lists instances in which a concealed permit holder shot the wrong person.
www.gvpedia.org
www.newsweek.com
Arrests and/or conviction for crimes are not the only dis qualifier. Certain mental health issues can also apply to being bared purchase of a weapon. The most recent mass shooter withheld information on their mental health problem and acquired their firearm illegally.
Yeah....the source is bullshit....
Lott never said permit holders have never shot the wrong person....he stated during mass public shootings they haven't....you idiot....
Your source lied to you...
Your source and claim...
- In his 2020 book, Gun Control Myths, researcher John Lott claims a concealed handgun permit holder has never shot the wrong person, such as a bystander.
- Lott repeats this claim in a January 2021 opinion piece in Newsweek.
- ======
MYTH: A concealed handgun permit holder has never shot the wrong person during an attack - GVPedia
FACT: GVPedia lists instances in which a concealed permit holder shot the wrong person.
What Lott actually stated...
Advocates of gun-free zones claim that permit holders will accidentally shoot bystanders, or that arriving police will shoot permit holders.
But in recent years, concealed carry permit holders have stopped dozens of what otherwise would have been mass public shootings in malls, churches, schools, universities and busy downtown areas. These cases virtually never get national news coverage. Not once have these permit holders ever shot a bystander. And police virtually always arrive well after the attack has ended, so there isn't confusion about who the target ought to be.
Don't Let Anti-Gun Activists Weaponize the Capitol Hill Riot
Criminals have an incentive to disobey the law precisely because the law-abiding obey it.
So......your source lied to you........does that matter to you?
And the Gifford's shooting.....
You had two concealed carry permit holders who responded to the shooting......one of them had their gun out, while the others disarmed the shooter.
The other permit holder came on the scene.......and did not shoot the first permit holder, but they did calmly disarm them to make sure they weren't part of the attack.....
Showing that on the Gifford's shooting, your source was also wrong.......2 concealed permit holders, neither one shot an innocent bystander and neither one was shot by police....
the FDA is trying to reduce that problem, but big profits say otherwise.
Again that sounds really really bad in a LOT of ways.
That didn't take long.
except where the constitution is enforced [as with prop. 8 in California]...btw, "adequate" is subjective and in this case quite generous...
...hmmm, you have know idea what you just said and admitted to do you?
No literacy test will suffice to protect from psychopathologies that can change their minds at any moment. Armed guards at schools should be educated about this fact, and should think of themselves as part of the wall @ the U.S.-Mexican border, the Reaper's Line.
I happen to agree about these stupid "Gun Free" zones.
Temporary minority rule. Whoop-de-do.
Yes, and people said you were dumb. Go figure.
you would have to disregard the constitution for that to be true.
Ah, ya always treat me feel like family nuts.
Firearms are now the number one cause of death for children in the United States, but rank no higher than fifth in 11 other large and wealthy countries, a new KFF analysis finds.
Guns – including accidental deaths, suicides, and homicides – killed 4,357 children (ages 1-19 years old) in the United States in 2020, or roughly 5.6 per 100,000 children. The U.S. is the only country among its peers that has seen a substantial increase in the rate of child firearm deaths in the last two decades (42%).
Firearms are the Leading Cause of Death for Children in the United States But Rank No Higher Than Fifth in Other Industrialized Nations | KFF
Firearms are now the number one cause of death for children in the United States, but rank no higher than fifth in 11 other large and wealthy countries, a new KFF analysis finds. Guns – including accidental deaths, suicides, and homicides – killed 4,357 children (ages 1-19 years old) in the...www.kff.org
Firearms are the leading cause of death for children and teens in the US.
everytownresearch.org
Preventing Gun Violence, the Leading Cause of Childhood Death
In 2020, firearm-related injuries surpassed motor vehicle crashes to become the leading cause of death among children and adolescents in the United States. Dr. Bianchi highlights NICHD-supported research to prevent firearm violence and reduce the related deaths, injuries, and trauma.www.nichd.nih.gov
The problem is guns, and the easy access to guns
