The Official Trump/Harris Debate Thread....With Live Feed

It's "weird" to mention something you believe happened as a way to highlight the problem of illegal immigration?
When that something is a single instance of an insane woman eating a dog, yes. Yes I do
 
...

C) seizing on random sensationalist stories like this only when people of color are involved is very clearly a dog whistle tactic

Did Trump mention what color the person in question was?
 
Post 4 pages ago posted this. I don't see anyone talking about it. You should. View attachment 1009736
First a magnification from the Harris debate earrings (which you claim are radios) Followed by a stock photo of Harris wearing those same earrings for a white house photo shoot.

Harris1.webp
Harris0.webp
 
Did Trump mention what color the person in question was?
We all knew it was a black woman. No one thought it was an illegal immigrant from Sweden or something

Is this really the hill you want to die on?
 
Why do you keep calling her "insane"? Wouldn't "hungry" be more accurate?
The story as I heard was she was sitting in the people’s driveway eating their dog. That’s insane.

There has been like a million immigrants who’ve come to the us over the years. This is the first story about one kidnapping and eating someone’s pet dog.

It’s ludicrous to imply this is a legitimate concern people should be worried about
 
The story as I heard was she was sitting in the people’s driveway eating their dog. That’s insane.

There has been like a million immigrants who’ve come to the us over the years. This is the first story about one kidnapping and eating someone’s pet dog.

It’s ludicrous to imply this is a legitimate concern people should be worried about

You really think this woman was the only person to ever eat dog in the US?
 
No restrictions on the number of weeks does not mean that a woman can abort a healthy , viable fetus at 9 months. Even if she wanted to medical ethics would not allow it.
I guess you don't understand what no restrictions mean. And ethics are in the eye of the beholder and an abortionist is in the business of abortion.

You find me the laws that say that its medically unethical to abort a healthy almost full term baby when their laws state that there are no restrictions. I think you're dead ass wrong.

I've read numerous sources and found no mention of restrictions based on health of the fetus or viability when the law states that there are no restrictions.

No restrictions mean no restrictions.
 
Last edited:
You really think this woman was the only person to ever eat dog in the US?
Wow. You just won’t admit that it was a bizarre and stupid thing for Trump to say. Amazing. I truly misjudged you
 
It's a permission slip, not a temporary grant of guardianship.

They can't use that permission slip to change the sex of my child.

Think for once.

What do you think the slip is for? So they can get medical service for the child, as well as other things only a guardian or parent is allowed to do.

Your second statement just shows how crazy the trans thing is. That should have to be said you fucking dunderhead.
 
Wow. You just won’t admit that it was a bizarre and stupid thing for Trump to say. ...

And you keep saying you believe it did happen. A lot of people are now claiming it didn't.
 
You really think this woman was the only person to ever eat dog in the US?
When I first moved to Clarksville TN, there was a Vietnamese family a couple houses down the street who kept cats and dogs in pens in their back yard that they were killing to eat.

They would somehow find them and put them in cages to eat them later.

We used to go back there at night and open the cages. Some of them found permanent homes instead of becoming food for those sick mofos.
 
I guess you don't understand what no restrictions mean. And ethics are in the eye of the beholder and an abortionist is in the business of abortion.
An abortionist is also a board certified physician. Overseen by a state medical review board that grants them their license.
If they performed abortions in the third trimester, for no reason apparent reason, other than the mother wanting one, they would have lost their license with the first complaint.
 
What do you think the slip is for? So they can get medical service for the child, as well as other things only a guardian or parent is allowed to do.

Your second statement just shows how crazy the trans thing is. That should have to be said you fucking dunderhead.
This is a permission slip.

Permission-Slip-01-790x1022.jpg


Not a transfer of guardianship.
 
If they performed abortions in the third trimester, for no reason apparent reason, other than the mother wanting one, they would have lost their license with the first complaint.

When I want to speak to an ignorant troll partisan hack like you, rattie, I'll let you know.
 
Back
Top Bottom