The numbers tell a story

To a normal person, that would be proof positive of how corrupt Republicans are.

To corrupt Stalinist hacks, it would indicate some sort of conspiracy. But nobody cares about them, given that they're corrupt Stalinist hacks.

Stalinist losers, your heroes are all heading to prison, as they deserve, and you can't do anything about it. You've spent years whining and lying in a lame attempt to excuse corruption, and failed completely. What makes you think more whining and lying will do the trick?
ironic
 
I've only laid out the possibilities on Trump beating all the charges.

That may or may not be likely. It's about as risky as having Biden fall flat on his face on the eve of the election!

It's as risky as Trump being stopped by the state on the eve of the election.

The attempted coup should have been dealt with on Jan.6th.
There was no attempted coup.
 
Maybe, and to be decided?
No. Simply no insurrection. Period. Words have meaning outside the sordid petty minds of our liberals.
There was something that brought the calls to hang Pence.
Yep. Some irrational dopes acting like scum. Still no insurrection or attempted insurrection.
 
No. Simply no insurrection. Period. Words have meaning outside the sordid petty minds of our liberals.

Yep. Some irrational dopes acting like scum. Still no insurrection or attempted insurrection.
You don't get it, so listen and I'll get it for you.

If Biden and the D's win then they will declare that it was a failed coup.

And if Trump and the R's win, they will declare that their coup attempt was justified and successful.
 
You don't get it,

I’m the one who does get it. You’re just a compulsively dishonest hackneyed Commie troll.
so listen and I'll get it for you.
That ^ :itsok: made no sense.
If Biden and the D's win then they will declare that it was a failed coup.
Wrong. They have no authority and power to do any such thing
And if Trump and the R's win, they will declare that their coup attempt was justified and successful.
Also false. If Trump wins he will continue to deny any coup or attempted coup, you brainless lump of shit.
 
Thread summary:

Every Republican on this thread suckles greedily at the anus of corruption, and they want everyone to know it. The cult demands it of them, after all.

And boy howdy, do they get triggered when you point out that. Despite their best efforts at whining and pushing deranged conspiracy theories, members of DerParteiRepublikkan are still not above the law. The leaders are becoming Bubba's cellmates, and no amount of crying will change that.
 

Here is what a DNC apologist had to say about how corrupt the GOP is compared to the DNC over the last 50 years.

When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, it's so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly "corrupt" the Democrats are. So why don't we break it down by president and the numbers?

In the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That's one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership.

In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That's more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren't really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn't found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford (and a pardon carries with it a legal admission of guilt on the part of the pardoned). So those only serve to make Republicans look even worse.

To sum up, Democrats had 3 indictments, one conviction, and one prison sentence.

Republicans have had 120 indictments, 89 convictions, and 34 prison sentences.


Of course, this was meant to show just how much better the DNC is on a legal and moral level, that is, unless you follow closely just how corrupt the DNC continues to be with nothing done about it.

For the conservative, this is the best evidence we have of a two tiered legal system, and Trump is not even in the mix here.
So, what you’re saying is, repubs need to learn to cover their butts as well as dems do?

Look, I say both sides are corrupt, but you’re really saying there isn’t much corruption on the dem side??

Also, I’m not going to trust the “research” from one person who nobody knows, who has stated his goal was to prove that repubs had more corruption.
 
To a normal person, that would be proof positive of how corrupt Republicans are.

To corrupt Stalinist hacks, it would indicate some sort of conspiracy. But nobody cares about them, given that they're corrupt Stalinist hacks.

Stalinist losers, your heroes are all heading to prison, as they deserve, and you can't do anything about it. You've spent years whining and lying in a lame attempt to excuse corruption, and failed completely. What makes you think more whining and lying will do the trick?

RICO charges
HAHAAHHAAHHAAHHHHHHHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAAHAAAAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…….

AAAAAAAAAA……..HAAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAVVAVAVVAAVAVVAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAAAAA!
 

Here is what a DNC apologist had to say about how corrupt the GOP is compared to the DNC over the last 50 years.

When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, it's so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly "corrupt" the Democrats are. So why don't we break it down by president and the numbers?

In the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That's one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership.

In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That's more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren't really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn't found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford (and a pardon carries with it a legal admission of guilt on the part of the pardoned). So those only serve to make Republicans look even worse.

To sum up, Democrats had 3 indictments, one conviction, and one prison sentence.

Republicans have had 120 indictments, 89 convictions, and 34 prison sentences.


Of course, this was meant to show just how much better the DNC is on a legal and moral level, that is, unless you follow closely just how corrupt the DNC continues to be with nothing done about it.

For the conservative, this is the best evidence we have of a two tiered legal system, and Trump is not even in the mix here.
It means that the GOP is far more lawless.
 
So why did no one go after them?

Keep in mind, turning down Trump for anything would be deemed a good thing to do by the political elite.

This just goes to drive home my point.
Was the point......trump only hires the best people.

:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
 
So you have a two tiered judicial system that was weaponized decades ago, what else is new?
 

Forum List

Back
Top